Ji Myeong-Hoon, Seoung Youl-Hun
Department of Radiological Science, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Cheongju University, Cheongju 28503, Republic of Korea.
The Korean Registry for Diagnostic Medical Sonography (KRDMS), Daejeon 35041, Republic of Korea.
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Sep 29;11(19):2655. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11192655.
Traditional diagnosis of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in the heart has involved the use of transcranial Doppler (TCD). However, TCD is essentially a blind test that cannot directly visualize the location of blood vessels. Since TCD relies on qualitative assessments by examiners, there is room for errors, such as misalignment of the ultrasound's angle of incidence with the actual blood vessels. This limitation affects the reproducibility and consistency of the examination. In this study, we presented an alternative approach for assessing right-to-left shunt (RLS) associated with PFO using contrast transcranial color-coded Doppler (C-TCCD) with bubble contrast. The patient under consideration had been diagnosed with an ischemic stroke through imaging, but the subsequent cardiac work-up failed to determine the cause. Employing C-TCCD for RLS screening revealed a confirmed RLS of Spencer's three grades. Subsequently, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was conducted to evaluate PFO risk factors, confirming an 8 mm PFO size, a 21 mm tunnel length, a hypermobile interatrial septum, and persistent RLS. The calculated high-risk PFO score was 4 points, categorizing it as a very high risk PFO. This case underscores the importance of C-TCCD screening in detecting RLS associated with PFO, especially in cryptogenic stroke patients, when identifying the underlying cause of ischemic stroke becomes challenging.
心脏卵圆孔未闭(PFO)的传统诊断方法涉及经颅多普勒(TCD)的使用。然而,TCD本质上是一种盲法检测,无法直接可视化血管的位置。由于TCD依赖于检查者的定性评估,存在误差空间,例如超声入射角与实际血管的对准偏差。这种局限性影响了检查的可重复性和一致性。在本研究中,我们提出了一种替代方法,即使用带有气泡造影剂的对比经颅彩色编码多普勒(C-TCCD)来评估与PFO相关的右向左分流(RLS)。所考虑的患者通过影像学诊断为缺血性卒中,但随后的心脏检查未能确定病因。采用C-TCCD进行RLS筛查显示,确诊为Spencer三级RLS。随后进行经食管超声心动图(TEE)以评估PFO危险因素,确认PFO大小为8mm,隧道长度为21mm,房间隔活动度高,且存在持续性RLS。计算得出的高危PFO评分为4分,将其归类为极高危PFO。该病例强调了C-TCCD筛查在检测与PFO相关的RLS中的重要性,尤其是在不明原因卒中患者中,当确定缺血性卒中的潜在病因具有挑战性时。