• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一次性与非一次性吸引引流装置的比较：一项对照试验报告。

A comparison between disposable and non-disposable suction drainage units: a report of a controlled trial.

作者信息

Britton B J, Gilmore O J, Lumley J S, Castleden W M

出版信息

Br J Surg. 1979 Apr;66(4):279-80. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800660420.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.1800660420
PMID:378315
Abstract

A randomized trial of high vacuum Redivac drains and low vacuum Portovac drains has been conducted in 46 female patients undergoing simple mastectomy through a transverse skin incision. The Redivac units drained less fluid, stayed in place for a day less than the Portovac units and were emptied once less often.

摘要

一项针对46名经横向皮肤切口行单纯乳房切除术的女性患者，开展了一项关于高负压Redivac引流管和低负压Portovac引流管的随机试验。Redivac引流装置引流出的液体较少，留置时间比Portovac引流装置少一天，且排空次数少一次。

相似文献

1
A comparison between disposable and non-disposable suction drainage units: a report of a controlled trial.一次性与非一次性吸引引流装置的比较：一项对照试验报告。
Br J Surg. 1979 Apr;66(4):279-80. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800660420.
2
High-vacuum drains rival conventional underwater-seal drains after pediatric heart surgery.小儿心脏手术后，高真空引流管与传统的水封引流管效果相当。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Mar;27(3):395-9; discussion 399-400. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.11.023. Epub 2004 Dec 25.
3
[Gravity drainage versus suction drainage: an experimental and clinical study].[重力引流与负压引流：一项实验与临床研究]
Unfallchirurg. 1989 Jan;92(1):37-42.
4
A comparison between suction and corrugated drainage after simple mastectomy: a report of a controlled trial.
Br J Surg. 1976 Jan;63(1):67-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800630115.
5
A comparison of two types of vacuum drainage after cholecystectomy.胆囊切除术后两种类型负压引流的比较。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1984 May;66(3):190-1.
6
Half versus full vacuum suction drainage after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer- a prospective randomized clinical trial[ISRCTN24484328].乳腺癌改良根治术后半真空与全真空吸引引流的前瞻性随机临床试验[ISRCTN24484328]
BMC Cancer. 2005 Jan 27;5:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-5-11.
7
Closed suction drainage versus closed simple drainage in the management of modified radical mastectomy wounds.改良根治性乳房切除术后伤口处理中闭式负压引流与闭式单纯引流的比较
S Afr Med J. 2008 Sep;98(9):712-5.
8
Reliavac evacuator: a new disposable suction drain: use after mastectomy and cholecystectomy.Reliavac引流器：一种新型一次性吸引引流装置：用于乳房切除术后和胆囊切除术后。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1984 Jul;66(4):289-90.
9
Inexpensive vacuum-assisted closure employing a conventional disposable closed-suction drainage system.采用传统一次性封闭吸引引流系统的廉价负压封闭引流术。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Jan;107(1):292-3. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200101000-00066.
10
[What suction drainage is optimal for drainage of wound secretion? A clinico-experimental study exemplified by the knee joint].
Chirurg. 1992 May;63(5):447-53.

引用本文的文献

1
Seroma formation after breast cancer surgery: what we have learned in the last two decades.乳腺癌手术后的血清肿形成：过去二十年的经验教训。
J Breast Cancer. 2012 Dec;15(4):373-80. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.4.373. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
2
[The value of wound drainage with or without suction].
Unfallchirurg. 2005 Nov;108(11):979-86. doi: 10.1007/s00113-005-1016-y.
3
[Pressure-volume analysis of wound suction drainage containers and suction capacity of drainage tubes].
Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1994;379(5):285-90. doi: 10.1007/BF00186394.
4
Contamination of underwater seal drainage systems in thoracic surgery.胸外科水下密封引流系统的污染
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1992 Jan;74(1):26-8.