Suppr超能文献

逆方法和棘波相位对发作间期高密度脑电图源重建的影响。

Effects of inverse methods and spike phases on interictal high-density EEG source reconstruction.

作者信息

van de Velden Daniel, Heide Ev-Christin, Bouter Caroline, Bucerius Jan, Riedel Christian H, Focke Niels K

机构信息

University Medical Center Göttingen, Clinic for Neurology, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.

University Medical Center Göttingen, Clinic for Neurology, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Neurophysiol. 2023 Dec;156:4-13. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.08.020. Epub 2023 Sep 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of inverse methods and timepoints of interictal epileptic discharges (IEDs) used for high-density electric source imaging (hd-ESI) in pharmacoresistant focal epilepsies.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the hd-ESI and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) of 21 operated patients with pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy (Engel I). Volumetric hd-ESI was performed with three different inverse methods such as the inverse solution linearly constrained minimum variance (LCMV, a beamformer method), standardized low resolution electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA) and weighted minimum-norm estimation (wMNE) and at different IED phases. Hd-ESI accuracy was determined by volumetric overlap and distance between hd-ESI source maximum, as well as FDG-PET hypometabolic region relative to the resection zone (RZ).

RESULTS

In our cohort, the shortest distances and greatest volumetric overlaps to the RZ were found in the half-rise and peak-phase for all inverse methods. The distance to the RZ was not different between the centroid of the clinical hypothesis-based cluster and the source maximum in peak-phase. However, the distance of the hypothesis-based cluster was significantly shorter compared to the cluster selected by the smallest p-value.

CONCLUSIONS

Hd-ESI provides the greatest accuracy in determining the RZ at the IED half-rise and peak-phase for all applied inverse methods, whereby sLORETA and LCMV were equally accurate.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our results offer guidance in selecting inverse methods and IED phases for hd-ESI, compare the performance of hd-ESI and FDG-PET and encourage future studies in investigating the relationship between interictal ESI and FDG-PET hypometabolism.

摘要

目的

确定用于药物难治性局灶性癫痫的高密度电源成像(hd-ESI)的逆方法和发作间期癫痫样放电(IED)时间点的影响。

方法

我们回顾性评估了21例接受手术的药物难治性局灶性癫痫患者(Engel I级)的hd-ESI和[18F]氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET)。采用三种不同的逆方法,即线性约束最小方差逆解(LCMV,一种波束形成器方法)、标准化低分辨率电磁断层扫描(sLORETA)和加权最小范数估计(wMNE),并在不同的IED阶段进行了体积hd-ESI。通过体积重叠以及hd-ESI源最大值之间的距离,以及相对于切除区(RZ)的FDG-PET低代谢区来确定hd-ESI的准确性。

结果

在我们的队列中,所有逆方法在半上升期和峰值期与RZ的距离最短且体积重叠最大。在峰值期,基于临床假设的簇的质心与源最大值到RZ的距离没有差异。然而,与通过最小p值选择的簇相比,基于假设的簇的距离明显更短。

结论

对于所有应用的逆方法,hd-ESI在发作间期癫痫样放电半上升期和峰值期确定RZ时提供了最高的准确性,其中sLORETA和LCMV同样准确。

意义

我们的结果为hd-ESI选择逆方法和发作间期癫痫样放电阶段提供了指导,比较了hd-ESI和FDG-PET的性能,并鼓励未来研究探讨发作间期电源成像与FDG-PET低代谢之间的关系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验