• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

推注剂量与持续输注肾上腺素和苯肾上腺素的准备/给药:模拟。

Preparation/administration of push-dose versus continuous infusion epinephrine and phenylephrine: A simulation.

机构信息

SUNY Upstate University Hospital, 750 E Adams St, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States of America.

SUNY Upstate University Hospital, 750 E Adams St, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States of America; SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States of America.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Dec;74:135-139. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.10.002. Epub 2023 Oct 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2023.10.002
PMID:37832396
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypotension is a common problem in the emergency department (ED) and intensive care unit (ICU) and can increase risk for poor outcomes. Many EDs/ICUs utilize epinephrine and phenylephrine to treat hypotension and these medications are most often administered as a continuous infusion (CI). Push-dose (PD) is the administration of small medication doses as intermittent intravenous pushes (IVPs). There is limited information comparing the time required to prepare and administer PD versus CI and errors have been reported when preparing and administering these medications at bedside. This simulation study sought to estimate preparation and administration times and preparation and errors with PD and CI epinephrine and phenylephrine when prepared by an ED/ICU pharmacist.

METHODS

This crossover simulation study took place in a simulation center at an academic medical center and utilized a multi-venous intravenous training arm kit equip with an 18-gauge intravenous line, an extension tubing set, and a luer-lock adapter. The primary outcome was total preparation and administration time in seconds. The secondary outcome was major preparation and administration errors, defined as errors causing a five-fold or greater overdose.

RESULTS

In total, 16 pharmacists participated, including nine ED and seven ICU pharmacists. PD had faster total preparation and administration time and administration time, but not preparation time; PD showed an approximate 70 s decrease in total preparation and administration time versus CI. PD had more major preparation and administration errors and six PD preparations (18.8%, 6/32) had at least one major preparation and administration error. CI, on the other hand, had no major preparation and administration errors.

DISCUSSION

This simulation found faster total preparation and administration time with PD versus CI epinephrine and phenylephrine, but also found that PD had more major preparation and administration errors. Dilutional errors during medication preparation were the cause of 83.3% (5/6) of our overdoses.

CONCLUSION

This simulation study showed that ED/ICU pharmacists had faster median total preparation and administration times for PD epinephrine and phenylephrine versus CI, but PD also had more preparation and administration errors.

摘要

背景

低血压是急诊科(ED)和重症监护病房(ICU)的常见问题,会增加不良预后的风险。许多 ED/ICU 利用肾上腺素和去甲肾上腺素来治疗低血压,这些药物通常作为连续输注(CI)给予。推注剂量(PD)是间歇性静脉推注(IVP)给予小剂量药物。比较 PD 和 CI 肾上腺素和去甲肾上腺素准备和给药所需时间的信息有限,并且在床边准备和给药时已经报告了错误。这项模拟研究旨在估计 ED/ICU 药剂师准备和给药时 PD 和 CI 肾上腺素和去甲肾上腺素的准备和给药时间以及准备和错误。

方法

这项交叉模拟研究在学术医疗中心的模拟中心进行,使用了带有 18 号静脉内管线、延长管套件和鲁尔锁适配器的多静脉静脉培训臂套件。主要结局是秒的总准备和给药时间。次要结局是主要的准备和给药错误,定义为导致五倍或更大过量的错误。

结果

共有 16 名药剂师参与,包括 9 名 ED 药剂师和 7 名 ICU 药剂师。PD 具有更快的总准备和给药时间以及给药时间,但不是准备时间;与 CI 相比,PD 总准备和给药时间减少了约 70 秒。PD 有更多的主要准备和给药错误,并且 6/32 个 PD 制剂(18.8%)有至少一个主要准备和给药错误。另一方面,CI 没有主要的准备和给药错误。

讨论

这项模拟研究发现,与 CI 肾上腺素和去甲肾上腺素相比,PD 具有更快的总准备和给药时间,但也发现 PD 有更多的准备和给药错误。药物准备过程中的稀释错误是我们 83.3%(5/6)的过量的原因。

结论

这项模拟研究表明,与 CI 相比,ED/ICU 药剂师对 PD 肾上腺素和去甲肾上腺素的中位总准备和给药时间更快,但 PD 也有更多的准备和给药错误。

相似文献

1
Preparation/administration of push-dose versus continuous infusion epinephrine and phenylephrine: A simulation.推注剂量与持续输注肾上腺素和苯肾上腺素的准备/给药:模拟。
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Dec;74:135-139. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.10.002. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
2
Human Errors and Adverse Hemodynamic Events Related to "Push Dose Pressors" in the Emergency Department.急诊中与“推注剂量升压药”相关的人为失误和不良血液动力学事件。
J Med Toxicol. 2019 Oct;15(4):276-286. doi: 10.1007/s13181-019-00716-z. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
3
Push dose pressors: Experience in critically ill patients outside of the operating room.推注型升压药:在手术室之外的危重症患者中的应用经验。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Mar;37(3):494-498. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
4
Scoping Review: Is Push-Dose Norepinephrine a Better Choice?范围综述:推注去甲肾上腺素是更好的选择吗?
West J Emerg Med. 2024 Sep;25(5):708-714. doi: 10.5811/westjem.18584.
5
A Mobile Device App to Reduce Time to Drug Delivery and Medication Errors During Simulated Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.一款用于减少模拟儿科心肺复苏期间药物送达时间和用药错误的移动设备应用程序:一项随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 1;19(2):e31. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7005.
6
Errors during the preparation of drug infusions: a randomized controlled trial.药物输注准备过程中的错误:一项随机对照试验。
Br J Anaesth. 2012 Nov;109(5):729-34. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes257. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
7
A Review of Push-Dose Vasopressors in the Peri-operative and Critical Care Setting.围手术期及重症监护环境中推注式血管升压药的综述
J Pharm Pract. 2023 Aug;36(4):925-932. doi: 10.1177/08971900221096967. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
8
Comparison of push-dose phenylephrine and epinephrine in the emergency department.急诊科中推注剂量去氧肾上腺素与肾上腺素的比较。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Feb;52:43-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.11.033. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
9
Safety of Phenylephrine Infusion Through Peripheral Intravenous Catheter in the Neurological Intensive Care Unit.外周静脉留置针输注苯肾上腺素在神经重症监护病房的安全性。
J Intensive Care Med. 2018 Oct;33(10):589-592. doi: 10.1177/0885066617712214. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
10
A Mobile Device App to Reduce Medication Errors and Time to Drug Delivery During Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Study Protocol of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial.一种用于减少儿科心肺复苏期间用药错误和药物送达时间的移动设备应用程序:一项多中心随机对照交叉试验的研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Aug 22;6(8):e167. doi: 10.2196/resprot.7901.