Toulouse NeuroImaging Center (ToNIC), University of Toulouse, Inserm UMR1214, University Paul-Sabatier (UPS), Toulouse, France.
Toulouse NeuroImaging Center (ToNIC), University of Toulouse, Inserm UMR1214, University Paul-Sabatier (UPS), Toulouse, France.
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2024 Oct;180(8):715-735. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2023.04.010. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
Chronic pain is a non-motor symptom affecting from 60 to 80% of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). PD patients can suffer from different types of pain, either specific or not specific of the disease, and depending on various pathophysiological mechanisms (nociceptive, nociplastic or neuropathic), which can be present at any stage of the disease. Non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) are essential to complement routine care interventions in PD pain management. Moreover, in the literature, it has been shown that 42% of PD patients are already using complementary therapies. Hence, our aim was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of NPIs for pain management in PD. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Eighteen published randomized control trials (RCTs) were included between 2004 and 2021 leading to a total of 976 PD patients. From them, we reported fifteen different NPIs classified in seven categories: physical exercises, balneotherapy, manual therapy, acupuncture, botanical preparation, body-psychological practice and multiprotection care. Our results have shown that NPIs for PD pain management had a low-to-moderate level of evidence showing mainly favourable results, even if some NPIs presented inconclusive results. Moreover, our review highlighted the clinical relevance of some specific NPIs in PD pain management: NPIs consisting of active physical activities, opposed to passive activities. The safety of NPIs was also confirmed since only few minor transient adverse events were reported. Nevertheless, even if some interesting results were found, the methodology of future studies needs to be more robust and to include comprehensive descriptions in order to offer reliable and sound recommendations to clinicians.
慢性疼痛是一种非运动症状,影响 60%至 80%的帕金森病(PD)患者。PD 患者可能会遭受不同类型的疼痛,既有疾病特异性的也有非特异性的,并且取决于各种病理生理机制(伤害性、病理性或神经性),这些机制可能存在于疾病的任何阶段。非药物干预(NPIs)对于补充 PD 疼痛管理中的常规护理干预至关重要。此外,在文献中已经表明,42%的 PD 患者已经在使用补充疗法。因此,我们的目的是调查 NPIs 在 PD 疼痛管理中的有效性和安全性。我们按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明进行了系统评价。纳入了 2004 年至 2021 年期间发表的 18 项随机对照试验(RCTs),总共纳入了 976 名 PD 患者。从中,我们报告了 15 种不同的 NPIs,分为七类:体育锻炼、水疗、手法治疗、针灸、植物制剂、身心练习和多保护护理。我们的结果表明,NPIs 用于 PD 疼痛管理的证据水平为低至中度,主要显示出有利的结果,尽管一些 NPI 呈现出不确定的结果。此外,我们的综述强调了一些特定的 NPI 在 PD 疼痛管理中的临床相关性:NPIs 包括主动的身体活动,而不是被动的活动。NPIs 的安全性也得到了证实,因为只报告了少数轻微的短暂不良反应。然而,即使发现了一些有趣的结果,未来研究的方法学仍需要更加稳健,并包括全面的描述,以便为临床医生提供可靠和合理的建议。