• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在泰国,用利妥昔单抗治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症:一项经济评价和预算影响分析。

Rituximab for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Thailand: an economic evaluation and budget impact analysis.

机构信息

Mahidol University Health Technology Assessment (MUHTA) Graduate Program, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Neuroimmunology Unit, Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute of Thailand, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 13;23(1):1096. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10099-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-023-10099-1
PMID:37833729
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10571281/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis is an inflammatory demyelination process in the central nervous system (CNS) causing neurological disability and poor quality of life. Currently, Thai Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved disease-modifying therapy is costly, and most patients with multiple sclerosis are ineligible for treatment in Thailand as previous studies have challenged its cost-effectiveness. Off-label use of rituximab is inexpensive and highly effective in treating multiple sclerosis, but evidence of its cost-effectiveness in Thailand is yet to be collected.

METHODS

This study aimed to evaluate the cost-utility and budget impact of rituximab for multiple sclerosis treatment compared with best supportive care, the standard practice in Thailand to treat the disease. A Markov model with a one-month cycle length and lifetime horizon was applied to compare the costs and outcomes of rituximab and best supportive care based on a societal perspective. Accordingly, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated. Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to investigate parameter uncertainty. In addition, the Markov model was used to assess the 5-year budget impact from the government perspective.

RESULTS

A rituximab biosimilar demonstrated higher effectiveness and lower associated costs, compared to best supportive care, with the highest probability of being cost-effective (96%). The probability of relapse was the most sensitive parameter according to the one-way sensitivity analysis. The calculated budget impact of treating patients with multiple sclerosis in Thailand was 26,360,000 Thai baht (THB) or 844,255 United States dollars (USD) in the first fiscal year, and approximately 20,810,000-23,080,000 THB (666,608-739,388 USD) in the next four fiscal years.

CONCLUSION

In Thailand, a rituximab biosimilar would reduce the overall costs of multiple sclerosis treatment and should, therefore, be included in the National List of Essential Medicines.

摘要

背景

多发性硬化症是一种中枢神经系统(CNS)的炎症性脱髓鞘疾病,导致神经功能障碍和生活质量下降。目前,获得泰国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的疾病修正疗法费用昂贵,而且由于先前的研究对其成本效益提出了质疑,大多数多发性硬化症患者都不符合在泰国接受治疗的条件。利妥昔单抗的超说明书使用在治疗多发性硬化症方面既便宜又非常有效,但在泰国,其成本效益的证据尚未收集。

方法

本研究旨在评估与最佳支持性护理相比,利妥昔单抗治疗多发性硬化症的成本-效用和预算影响,后者是泰国治疗该疾病的标准做法。采用一个月为一个周期、终生为一个时间范围的马尔可夫模型,从社会角度比较利妥昔单抗和最佳支持性护理的成本和结果。相应地,估计了增量成本效益比。进行概率和单因素敏感性分析以调查参数不确定性。此外,还从政府角度使用马尔可夫模型评估了 5 年的预算影响。

结果

与最佳支持性护理相比,利妥昔单抗的生物类似物显示出更高的疗效和更低的相关成本,具有最高的成本效益可能性(96%)。根据单因素敏感性分析,复发概率是最敏感的参数。在泰国,治疗多发性硬化症患者的预计预算影响为 2636 万泰铢(THB)或 844255 美元(USD),在第一个财政年度,接下来的四个财政年度预计将达到 2081 万至 2308 万泰铢(666608 至 739388 美元)。

结论

在泰国,利妥昔单抗的生物类似物将降低多发性硬化症治疗的总体成本,因此应被纳入国家基本药物清单。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feb5/10571281/a62897132007/12913_2023_10099_Figd_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feb5/10571281/e92a6684dbb2/12913_2023_10099_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feb5/10571281/4a12965bec89/12913_2023_10099_Figb_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feb5/10571281/62bfcc8af5e2/12913_2023_10099_Figc_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feb5/10571281/a62897132007/12913_2023_10099_Figd_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feb5/10571281/e92a6684dbb2/12913_2023_10099_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feb5/10571281/4a12965bec89/12913_2023_10099_Figb_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feb5/10571281/62bfcc8af5e2/12913_2023_10099_Figc_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feb5/10571281/a62897132007/12913_2023_10099_Figd_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Rituximab for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Thailand: an economic evaluation and budget impact analysis.在泰国,用利妥昔单抗治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症:一项经济评价和预算影响分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 13;23(1):1096. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10099-1.
2
Cost effectiveness of rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder in Thailand: Economic evaluation and budget impact analysis.在泰国,利妥昔单抗和霉酚酸酯治疗视神经脊髓炎谱系疾病的成本效益:经济评价和预算影响分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 12;15(2):e0229028. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229028. eCollection 2020.
3
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of infliximab and its biosimilar in patients with refractory moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease using real world evidence in Thailand.使用泰国真实世界数据评估英夫利昔单抗及其生物类似药治疗难治性中重度克罗恩病的成本效果和预算影响分析。
J Med Econ. 2020 Nov;23(11):1302-1310. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1803889. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
4
Clinical and fringe benefits of rituximab in multiple sclerosis treatment in a poor resource setting: Case series and cost analysis.在资源匮乏环境下,利妥昔单抗治疗多发性硬化症的临床和边缘效益:病例系列和成本分析。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023 May;73:104673. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.104673. Epub 2023 Mar 26.
5
Cost-utility of First-line Disease-modifying Treatments for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.复发缓解型多发性硬化症一线疾病修正治疗的成本效益
Clin Ther. 2017 Mar;39(3):537-557.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.01.028. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
6
Cost-Utility Analysis Comparing Ocrelizumab Versus Rituximab in the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: The Colombian Perspective.Ocrelizumab 与利妥昔单抗治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的成本效用分析:哥伦比亚视角。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2023 Jul;36:83-91. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2023.02.008. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
7
Cost-utility analysis of dasatinib and nilotinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia refractory to first-line treatment with imatinib in Thailand.达沙替尼和尼罗替尼用于泰国对伊马替尼一线治疗耐药的慢性髓性白血病患者的成本-效用分析
Clin Ther. 2014 Apr 1;36(4):534-43. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of rituximab versus natalizumab in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.利妥昔单抗与那他珠单抗治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的成本效果分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 28;22(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07495-4.
9
COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS TREATMENT IN THAILAND.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018;34(6):584-592. doi: 10.1017/S0266462318003604. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
10
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of colorectal cancer screenings in a low- and middle-income country: example from Thailand.在中低收入国家进行结直肠癌筛查的成本效益和预算影响分析:来自泰国的例子。
J Med Econ. 2019 Dec;22(12):1351-1361. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1674065. Epub 2019 Oct 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety and efficacy of rituximab versus dimethyl fumarate in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis or clinically isolated syndrome in Sweden: a rater-blinded, phase 3, randomised controlled trial.利妥昔单抗与二甲基富马酸在瑞典复发缓解型多发性硬化或临床孤立综合征患者中的安全性和疗效:一项盲法、3 期、随机对照试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2022 Aug;21(8):693-703. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00209-5.
2
Multiple sclerosis incidence: A systematic review of change over time by geographical region.多发性硬化症发病率:按地理区域随时间变化的系统评价。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Jul;63:103932. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103932. Epub 2022 May 29.
3
Rituximab for people with multiple sclerosis.
利妥昔单抗治疗多发性硬化症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 8;11(11):CD013874. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013874.pub2.
4
Ethical use of off-label disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症的非适应证疾病修饰疗法的伦理使用。
Mult Scler. 2021 Aug;27(9):1403-1410. doi: 10.1177/13524585211030207. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
5
Rituximab in Multiple Sclerosis: Are We Ready for Regulatory Approval?利妥昔单抗治疗多发性硬化症:我们是否已准备好监管批准?
Front Immunol. 2021 Jul 6;12:661882. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.661882. eCollection 2021.
6
Pharmacokinetic Similarity and Comparative Pharmacodynamics, Safety, Efficacy, and Immunogenicity of DRL_RI Versus Reference Rituximab in Biologics-Naïve Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Three-Arm Study.DRL_RI 与参照利妥昔单抗在生物制剂初治的中重度类风湿关节炎患者中的药代动力学相似性和比较药效学、安全性、疗效和免疫原性:一项双盲、随机、三臂研究。
BioDrugs. 2020 Apr;34(2):183-196. doi: 10.1007/s40259-020-00406-1.
7
Randomized, Double-Blind, Pharmacokinetic Equivalence Trial Comparing DRL-Rituximab With MabThera in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.在弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者中比较DRL-利妥昔单抗与美罗华的随机、双盲、药代动力学等效性试验。
J Glob Oncol. 2019 Nov;5:1-13. doi: 10.1200/JGO.19.00248.
8
Economic burden of multiple sclerosis in a population with low physical disability.低身体残疾人群多发性硬化症的经济负担。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 20;19(1):609. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6907-x.
9
Efficacy and safety of rituximab for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.利妥昔单抗治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Autoimmun Rev. 2019 May;18(5):542-548. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2019.03.011. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
10
Global, regional, and national burden of multiple sclerosis 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.全球、区域和国家多发性硬化症负担 1990-2016 年:2016 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Mar;18(3):269-285. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30443-5. Epub 2019 Jan 21.