Suppr超能文献

两种人皮肤细胞分离方案的比较及其对角质形成细胞和成纤维细胞培养的影响。

Comparison of Two Human Skin Cell Isolation Protocols and Their Influence on Keratinocyte and Fibroblast Culture.

作者信息

Sierra-Sánchez Álvaro, Barbier Martin A, Magne Brice, Larouche Danielle, Arias-Santiago Salvador, Germain Lucie

机构信息

LOEX Tissue Engineering Laboratory, Université Laval Research Center and Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, QC G1J 1Z4, Canada.

Division of Regenerative Medicine, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, QC G1J 1Z4, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Sep 28;24(19):14712. doi: 10.3390/ijms241914712.

Abstract

For the development of advanced therapies, the use of primary cells instead of cell lines is preferred. The manufacture of human tissue-engineered skin substitutes requires efficient isolation and culture protocols allowing a massive expansion of the cells in culture from an initial specimen of a minimal size. This study compared two skin cell isolation protocols, routinely applied in two clinical laboratories. Epithelial (keratinocytes) and dermal (fibroblasts) cells were isolated and cultured from three human skin biopsies (N = 3). The two-step digestion protocol (LOEX-Protocol) firstly used thermolysin to enzymatically disrupt the dermal-epidermal junction while, for the one-step digestion protocol (UPCIT-Protocol), mechanical detachment with scissors was applied. Then, the epidermal and dermal layers were digested, respectively, to achieve cell isolation. The cell size, viability, yield and growth were analyzed over five passages (P). The colony-forming efficiency (CFE) and Keratin 19 (K19) expression of epithelial cells were also assessed after P0 and P1. Regarding the dermal cells, no significant differences were observed in the tested parameters of isolation and culture. However, for the epithelial cells, viability was higher (93% vs. 85%) and the number of cells extracted per cm of skin was 3.4 times higher using the LOEX-Protocol compared to the UPCIT-Protocol. No significant difference was observed for any parameter once the keratinocytes were cultured from P1 to P4. The CFE and K19 expression decreased from P0 to P1 in both protocols, probably due to the culture process. This study shows that both protocols enable the efficient isolation of skin dermal and epithelial cells and subsequent culture to produce grafts destined for the treatment of patients.

摘要

对于先进疗法的开发,优先使用原代细胞而非细胞系。制造人体组织工程皮肤替代品需要高效的分离和培养方案,以便从最小尺寸的初始样本中大量扩增培养细胞。本研究比较了两个临床实验室常规应用的两种皮肤细胞分离方案。从三块人类皮肤活检样本(N = 3)中分离并培养上皮细胞(角质形成细胞)和真皮细胞(成纤维细胞)。两步消化方案(LOEX方案)首先使用嗜热菌蛋白酶酶解破坏真皮 - 表皮连接,而对于一步消化方案(UPCIT方案),则采用剪刀进行机械分离。然后,分别消化表皮层和真皮层以实现细胞分离。在五个传代(P)过程中分析细胞大小、活力、产量和生长情况。在P0和P1之后还评估了上皮细胞的集落形成效率(CFE)和角蛋白19(K19)表达。对于真皮细胞,在分离和培养的测试参数中未观察到显著差异。然而,对于上皮细胞,使用LOEX方案时活力更高(93%对85%)且每平方厘米皮肤提取的细胞数量比UPCIT方案高3.4倍。从P1培养至P4的角质形成细胞,在任何参数上均未观察到显著差异。两种方案中,CFE和K19表达从P0到P1均下降,这可能是由于培养过程所致。本研究表明,两种方案都能有效地分离皮肤真皮和上皮细胞,并随后进行培养以生产用于治疗患者的移植物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c47/10572435/ef92e066b9a6/ijms-24-14712-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验