Hu Junshan, Li Chengyu, Fang Jinrong, Chen Shizhan, Xuan Shanyong, Tian Wei
College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China.
State-operated Wuhu Machinery Factory, Wuhu 241007, China.
Materials (Basel). 2023 Sep 22;16(19):6361. doi: 10.3390/ma16196361.
Composite patches are widely accepted as a useful practice for the repair of cracked aircraft components and the repair method is of vital importance to the final performance of the repaired structures. The present research experimentally studied the repair efficiency and processing stability of pre-cured, prepreg (including unidirectional and plain weave prepregs) and wet-layup methods for use on cracked Ti-alloy panels through the configuration of a butt joint bonded with a one-sided composite patch. The efficiency and stability of these repair methods were elaborately evaluated and compared via the load bearing behavior, the microstructure of the bonding interface, and the structural failure morphology through two batches of testing specimens. Typical patterns were found in load-displacement curves where the initial damage and ultimate bearing load points divided them into elastic-linear, damage propagation and complete fracture phases. Although the co-cure process of both unidirectional prepreg and wet-layup methods can form a jigsaw-like demarcation interface between the adhesive layer and the composite patch to achieve a good bonding force and a high recovery of loading performance, the latter presents porous patches with a high coefficient of variation in load-carrying capacity. Conversely, the pre-cured laminate and the plain weave prepreg patches failed to restore the mechanical properties owing to the weak bonding interface and the low axial patch strength, respectively. The unidirectional prepreg patch was proven to be the optimal repair method for the cracked metallic structures when balancing repair efficiency and processing stability.
复合补片作为修复飞机部件裂纹的一种有效方法已被广泛接受,且修复方法对修复后结构的最终性能至关重要。本研究通过单面复合补片对接接头的构型,对预固化、预浸料(包括单向和平面编织预浸料)和湿法铺层法修复裂纹钛合金面板的修复效率和加工稳定性进行了实验研究。通过两批测试试件,从承载行为、粘结界面微观结构和结构失效形态等方面对这些修复方法的效率和稳定性进行了详细评估和比较。在载荷-位移曲线中发现了典型模式,初始损伤点和极限承载载荷点将其分为弹性线性、损伤扩展和完全断裂阶段。尽管单向预浸料和湿法铺层法的共固化过程都能在胶粘剂层和复合补片之间形成类似拼图的分界界面,以实现良好的粘结力和较高的加载性能恢复,但后者呈现出多孔补片,其承载能力的变异系数较高。相反,预固化层压板和平面编织预浸料补片分别由于粘结界面薄弱和轴向补片强度低而未能恢复力学性能。在平衡修复效率和加工稳定性时,单向预浸料补片被证明是裂纹金属结构的最佳修复方法。