• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性冠状动脉综合征合并非瓣膜性心房颤动且接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的三联抗栓治疗两种方法:哪种更有效且更安全?

Two Approaches to Triple Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Which Is More Efficient and Safer?

作者信息

Bachorski Witold, Bychowski Jakub, Gruchała Marcin, Jaguszewski Miłosz

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Gdansk, M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Sep 26;13(19):3055. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13193055.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics13193055
PMID:37835798
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10572308/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are at high risk of bleeding and thromboembolic events. Thus, optimal treatment strategies in this challenging subset have been controversial. Herein, we aim to investigate different triple antithrombotic treatment (TAT) strategies in patients with ACS and AF after PCI.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center study based on all consecutive patients with the diagnosis of ACS and AF treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) plus dual antiplatelet therapy using a P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel) and aspirin (for 1 to 3 months) and observed for 12 months for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding incidents.

RESULTS

MACE occurred in 26.6% of patients treated with the VKA and 30.9% with NOAC ( = 0.659). Bleeding occurred in 7.8% of patients treated with VKA and 7.4% with NOAC (ns).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with ACS and AF who had undergone PCI, there was no significant difference in the risk of bleeding and ischemic events among those who received TAT with NOAC and VKA.

摘要

引言

接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)和心房颤动(AF)患者发生出血和血栓栓塞事件的风险很高。因此,针对这一具有挑战性的亚组患者的最佳治疗策略一直存在争议。在此,我们旨在研究PCI术后ACS和AF患者不同的三联抗栓治疗(TAT)策略。

方法

这是一项回顾性单中心研究,纳入所有连续诊断为ACS和AF且接受维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)或非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂(NOAC)加使用P2Y12抑制剂(氯吡格雷)和阿司匹林的双联抗血小板治疗(持续1至3个月)的患者,并观察12个月,记录主要不良心脏事件(MACE)和主要或临床相关的非主要出血事件。

结果

接受VKA治疗的患者中26.6%发生MACE,接受NOAC治疗的患者中30.9%发生MACE(P = 0.659)。接受VKA治疗的患者中7.8%发生出血,接受NOAC治疗的患者中7.4%发生出血(无显著性差异)。

结论

在接受PCI的ACS和AF患者中,接受NOAC和VKA进行TAT的患者在出血和缺血事件风险方面无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffd6/10572308/6460d7c6a20e/diagnostics-13-03055-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffd6/10572308/63559f1d43f4/diagnostics-13-03055-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffd6/10572308/6460d7c6a20e/diagnostics-13-03055-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffd6/10572308/63559f1d43f4/diagnostics-13-03055-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffd6/10572308/6460d7c6a20e/diagnostics-13-03055-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Two Approaches to Triple Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Which Is More Efficient and Safer?急性冠状动脉综合征合并非瓣膜性心房颤动且接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的三联抗栓治疗两种方法:哪种更有效且更安全?
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Sep 26;13(19):3055. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13193055.
2
Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants (NOAC) Versus Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) for Atrial Fibrillation with Elective or Urgent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis with a Particular Focus on Combination Type.非维生素K口服抗凝剂(NOAC)与维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)用于伴有择期或紧急经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心房颤动:一项特别关注联合类型的荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 14;9(4):1120. doi: 10.3390/jcm9041120.
3
Revisiting the effects of omitting aspirin in combined antithrombotic therapies for atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndromes or percutaneous coronary interventions: meta-analysis of pooled data from the PIONEER AF-PCI, RE-DUAL PCI, and AUGUSTUS trials.重新探讨在心房颤动和急性冠状动脉综合征或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中联合抗血栓治疗中省略阿司匹林的影响:来自 PIONEER AF-PCI、RE-DUAL PCI 和 AUGUSTUS 试验的汇总数据的荟萃分析。
Europace. 2020 Jan 1;22(1):33-46. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz259.
4
Safety and Efficacy of Antithrombotic Strategies in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心房颤动患者抗栓策略的安全性和疗效:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Aug 1;4(8):747-755. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.1880.
5
Apixaban versus PhenpRocoumon: Oral AntiCoagulation plus antiplatelet tHerapy in patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Atrial Fibrillation (APPROACH-ACS-AF): Rationale and design of the prospective randomized parallel-group, open-label, blinded-endpoint, superiority, multicenter-trial of a triple therapy versus a dual therapy in patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome undergoing coronary stenting.阿哌沙班与苯丙香豆素对比:急性冠状动脉综合征合并心房颤动患者的口服抗凝加抗血小板治疗(APPROACH-ACS-AF):在接受冠状动脉支架置入术的心房颤动合并急性冠状动脉综合征患者中,三联疗法与双联疗法比较的前瞻性随机平行组、开放标签、盲终点、优效性、多中心试验的原理与设计。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2021 Jul 1;35:100810. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100810. eCollection 2021 Aug.
6
Risk of Stroke vs. Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Dual vs. Triple Antithrombotic Therapy.非瓣膜性心房颤动患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后发生卒中和脑出血的风险:比较双联与三联抗栓治疗的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Apr;30(4):105654. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105654. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
7
Antithrombotic strategies in patients needing oral anticoagulation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis.需要口服抗凝治疗的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的抗血栓策略:一项网状荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Mar;97(4):581-588. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29192. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
8
Dabigatran versus vitamin k antagonist: an observational across-cohort comparison in acute coronary syndrome patients with atrial fibrillation.达比加群与维生素 K 拮抗剂:急性冠状动脉综合征合并心房颤动患者的跨队列观察性比较。
J Thromb Haemost. 2018 Mar;16(3):465-473. doi: 10.1111/jth.13931. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
9
Clinical Outcomes of Antithrombotic Strategies for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后房颤患者抗栓策略的临床结局
Int Heart J. 2019 May 30;60(3):546-553. doi: 10.1536/ihj.18-464. Epub 2019 May 17.
10
Optimal Antithrombotic Regimens for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Updated Network Meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心房颤动患者的最佳抗栓治疗方案:一项更新的网络荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 May 1;5(5):582-589. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.6175.

本文引用的文献

1
Current status of antithrombotic therapy and in-hospital outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in Germany.德国接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的房颤患者的抗栓治疗现状及院内结局
Herz. 2023 Mar;48(2):134-140. doi: 10.1007/s00059-022-05099-6. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
2
Edoxaban in atrial fibrillation patients with percutaneous coronary intervention by acute or chronic coronary syndrome presentation: a pre-specified analysis of the ENTRUST-AF PCI trial.依度沙班用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性或慢性冠状动脉综合征表现的房颤患者:ENTRUST-AF PCI试验的预先指定分析
Eur Heart J. 2020 Dec 14;41(47):4497-4504. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa617.
3
Novel Oral Anticoagulants Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的新型口服抗凝药
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul;13(7):e008465. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008465. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
4
Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants (NOAC) Versus Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) for Atrial Fibrillation with Elective or Urgent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis with a Particular Focus on Combination Type.非维生素K口服抗凝剂(NOAC)与维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)用于伴有择期或紧急经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心房颤动:一项特别关注联合类型的荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 14;9(4):1120. doi: 10.3390/jcm9041120.
5
Risk/Benefit Tradeoff of Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Early and Late After an Acute Coronary Syndrome or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From AUGUSTUS.急性冠状动脉综合征或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后早期和晚期心房颤动患者抗栓治疗的风险/获益权衡:来自 AUGUSTUS 的见解。
Circulation. 2020 May 19;141(20):1618-1627. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046534. Epub 2020 Mar 29.
6
Meta-analysis of Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心房颤动患者抗栓治疗的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Feb 15;125(4):521-527. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.11.022. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
7
Edoxaban-based versus vitamin K antagonist-based antithrombotic regimen after successful coronary stenting in patients with atrial fibrillation (ENTRUST-AF PCI): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial.依度沙班与维生素 K 拮抗剂在房颤患者成功经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后抗栓治疗方案的比较(ENTRUST-AF PCI):一项随机、开放标签、3b 期临床试验。
Lancet. 2019 Oct 12;394(10206):1335-1343. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31872-0. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
8
Safety and Efficacy of Antithrombotic Strategies in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心房颤动患者抗栓策略的安全性和疗效:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Aug 1;4(8):747-755. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.1880.
9
2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society in Collaboration With the Society of Thoracic Surgeons.2019年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/心律学会对2014年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/心律学会心房颤动患者管理指南的聚焦更新:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组和心律学会与胸外科医师协会合作报告
Circulation. 2019 Jul 9;140(2):e125-e151. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000665. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
10
Outcomes of anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation treated with or without antiplatelet therapy - A pooled analysis from the PREFER in AF and PREFER in AF PROLONGATON registries.伴有或不伴有抗血小板治疗的房颤抗凝患者的结局 - PREFER in AF 和 PREFER in AF PROLONGATON 注册研究的汇总分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Nov 1;270:160-166. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.06.098. Epub 2018 Jun 28.