The Burn Center, Department of Surgery, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Firefighters' Burn and Surgical Research Laboratory, MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
J Burn Care Res. 2024 Jan 5;45(1):70-79. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irad152.
Although use of thromboelastography (TEG) to diagnose coagulopathy and guide clinical decision-making is increasing, relative performance of different TEG methods has not been well-defined. Rapid-TEG (rTEG), kaolin-TEG (kTEG), and native-TEG (nTEG) were performed on blood samples from burn patients presenting to a regional center from admission to 21 days. Patients were categorized by burn severity, mortality, and fibrinolytic phenotypes (Shutdown [SD], Physiologic [PHYS], and Hyperfibrinolytic [HF]). Manufacturer ranges and published TEG cutoffs were examined. Concordance correlations (Rc) of TEG parameters (R, α-angle, maximum amplitude [MA], LY30) measured agreement and Cohen's Kappa (κ) determined interclass reliability. Patients (n = 121) were mostly male (n = 84; 69.4%), with median age 40 years, median TBSA burn 13%, and mortality 17% (n = 21). Severe burns (≥40% TBSA) were associated with lower admission α-angle for rTEG (P = .03) and lower MA for rTEG (P = .02) and kTEG (P = .01). MA was lower in patients who died (nTEG, P = .04; kTEG, P = .02; rTEG, P = .003). Admission HF was associated with increased mortality (OR, 10.45; 95% CI, 2.54-43.31, P = .001) on rTEG only. Delayed SD was associated with mortality using rTEG and nTEG (OR 9.46; 95% CI, 1.96-45.73; P = .005 and OR, 6.91; 95% CI, 1.35-35.48; P = .02). Admission TEGs showed poor agreement on R-time (Rc, 0.00-0.56) and α-angle (0.40 to 0.55), and moderate agreement on MA (0.67-0.81) and LY30 (0.72-0.93). Interclass reliability was lowest for R-time (κ, -0.07 to 0.01) and α-angle (-0.06 to 0.17) and highest for MA (0.22-0.51) and LY30 (0.29-0.49). Choice of TEG method may impact clinical decision-making. rTEG appeared most sensitive in parameter-specific associations with injury severity, abnormal fibrinolysis, and mortality.
尽管使用血栓弹性描记术(TEG)来诊断凝血功能障碍和指导临床决策的做法越来越多,但不同 TEG 方法的相对性能尚未得到明确界定。对来自区域性中心的烧伤患者的血液样本进行了快速 TEG(rTEG)、高岭土 TEG(kTEG)和天然 TEG(nTEG)检测。根据烧伤严重程度、死亡率和纤维蛋白溶解表型(关闭[SD]、生理[PHYS]和高纤维蛋白溶解[HF])对患者进行分类。检查了制造商范围和已发表的 TEG 截止值。TEG 参数(R、α角、最大振幅[MA]、LY30)的一致性相关系数(Rc)测量了一致性,Cohen's Kappa(κ)确定了组内可靠性。患者(n=121)主要为男性(n=84;69.4%),中位年龄为 40 岁,中位 TBSA 烧伤为 13%,死亡率为 17%(n=21)。严重烧伤(≥40%TBSA)与 rTEG 入院时较低的α角(P=0.03)和 rTEG 和 kTEG 较低的 MA(P=0.02)有关。死亡患者的 MA 较低(nTEG,P=0.04;kTEG,P=0.02;rTEG,P=0.003)。仅在 rTEG 上,入院时 HF 与较高的死亡率(比值比,10.45;95%置信区间,2.54-43.31,P=0.001)相关。rTEG 和 nTEG 上延迟 SD 与死亡率相关(比值比,9.46;95%置信区间,1.96-45.73;P=0.005 和比值比,6.91;95%置信区间,1.35-35.48;P=0.02)。入院 TEG 在 R 时间(Rc,0.00-0.56)和α角(0.40 至 0.55)上的一致性较差,而在 MA(0.67-0.81)和 LY30(0.72-0.93)上的一致性较好。R 时间(κ,-0.07 至 0.01)和α角(-0.06 至 0.17)的组内可靠性最低,MA(0.22-0.51)和 LY30(0.29-0.49)的组内可靠性最高。TEG 方法的选择可能会影响临床决策。rTEG 在与损伤严重程度、异常纤维蛋白溶解和死亡率相关的特定参数方面似乎最敏感。