Suppr超能文献

比较快速法、高岭土法和常规法 TEG 参数在伴有急性烧伤诱导性凝血障碍和异常纤维蛋白溶解功能的烧伤患者中的应用。

Comparison of Rapid-, Kaolin-, and Native-TEG Parameters in Burn Patient Cohorts With Acute Burn-induced Coagulopathy and Abnormal Fibrinolytic Function.

机构信息

The Burn Center, Department of Surgery, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA.

Firefighters' Burn and Surgical Research Laboratory, MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, DC 20010, USA.

出版信息

J Burn Care Res. 2024 Jan 5;45(1):70-79. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irad152.

Abstract

Although use of thromboelastography (TEG) to diagnose coagulopathy and guide clinical decision-making is increasing, relative performance of different TEG methods has not been well-defined. Rapid-TEG (rTEG), kaolin-TEG (kTEG), and native-TEG (nTEG) were performed on blood samples from burn patients presenting to a regional center from admission to 21 days. Patients were categorized by burn severity, mortality, and fibrinolytic phenotypes (Shutdown [SD], Physiologic [PHYS], and Hyperfibrinolytic [HF]). Manufacturer ranges and published TEG cutoffs were examined. Concordance correlations (Rc) of TEG parameters (R, α-angle, maximum amplitude [MA], LY30) measured agreement and Cohen's Kappa (κ) determined interclass reliability. Patients (n = 121) were mostly male (n = 84; 69.4%), with median age 40 years, median TBSA burn 13%, and mortality 17% (n = 21). Severe burns (≥40% TBSA) were associated with lower admission α-angle for rTEG (P = .03) and lower MA for rTEG (P = .02) and kTEG (P = .01). MA was lower in patients who died (nTEG, P = .04; kTEG, P = .02; rTEG, P = .003). Admission HF was associated with increased mortality (OR, 10.45; 95% CI, 2.54-43.31, P = .001) on rTEG only. Delayed SD was associated with mortality using rTEG and nTEG (OR 9.46; 95% CI, 1.96-45.73; P = .005 and OR, 6.91; 95% CI, 1.35-35.48; P = .02). Admission TEGs showed poor agreement on R-time (Rc, 0.00-0.56) and α-angle (0.40 to 0.55), and moderate agreement on MA (0.67-0.81) and LY30 (0.72-0.93). Interclass reliability was lowest for R-time (κ, -0.07 to 0.01) and α-angle (-0.06 to 0.17) and highest for MA (0.22-0.51) and LY30 (0.29-0.49). Choice of TEG method may impact clinical decision-making. rTEG appeared most sensitive in parameter-specific associations with injury severity, abnormal fibrinolysis, and mortality.

摘要

尽管使用血栓弹性描记术(TEG)来诊断凝血功能障碍和指导临床决策的做法越来越多,但不同 TEG 方法的相对性能尚未得到明确界定。对来自区域性中心的烧伤患者的血液样本进行了快速 TEG(rTEG)、高岭土 TEG(kTEG)和天然 TEG(nTEG)检测。根据烧伤严重程度、死亡率和纤维蛋白溶解表型(关闭[SD]、生理[PHYS]和高纤维蛋白溶解[HF])对患者进行分类。检查了制造商范围和已发表的 TEG 截止值。TEG 参数(R、α角、最大振幅[MA]、LY30)的一致性相关系数(Rc)测量了一致性,Cohen's Kappa(κ)确定了组内可靠性。患者(n=121)主要为男性(n=84;69.4%),中位年龄为 40 岁,中位 TBSA 烧伤为 13%,死亡率为 17%(n=21)。严重烧伤(≥40%TBSA)与 rTEG 入院时较低的α角(P=0.03)和 rTEG 和 kTEG 较低的 MA(P=0.02)有关。死亡患者的 MA 较低(nTEG,P=0.04;kTEG,P=0.02;rTEG,P=0.003)。仅在 rTEG 上,入院时 HF 与较高的死亡率(比值比,10.45;95%置信区间,2.54-43.31,P=0.001)相关。rTEG 和 nTEG 上延迟 SD 与死亡率相关(比值比,9.46;95%置信区间,1.96-45.73;P=0.005 和比值比,6.91;95%置信区间,1.35-35.48;P=0.02)。入院 TEG 在 R 时间(Rc,0.00-0.56)和α角(0.40 至 0.55)上的一致性较差,而在 MA(0.67-0.81)和 LY30(0.72-0.93)上的一致性较好。R 时间(κ,-0.07 至 0.01)和α角(-0.06 至 0.17)的组内可靠性最低,MA(0.22-0.51)和 LY30(0.29-0.49)的组内可靠性最高。TEG 方法的选择可能会影响临床决策。rTEG 在与损伤严重程度、异常纤维蛋白溶解和死亡率相关的特定参数方面似乎最敏感。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2591/10768763/594e18e19ebf/irad152_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验