Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York.
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Dec 1;208:126-133. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.09.039. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
Ischemic postconditioning (IPoC) is a technique suggested to reduce reperfusion injury in patients suffering acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), although its use is highly controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of IPoC with percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute STEMI, as measured by follow-up left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. The investigators searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for all randomized controlled trials published during the last 2 decades. After the removal of duplicates, 2,021 articles from online databases had been identified using relevant search criteria. The included randomized controlled trials had studied patients with acute STEMI and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow 0 to 1 at presentation and had measured follow-up LVEF using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Overall, 11 studies (n = 1,339 patients) qualified for inclusion. In each study, the control group did not differ significantly from the experimental group. The pooled data from included studies were analyzed using standardized mean difference between IPoC and control groups, and the 95% confidence interval for LVEF; the results were visualized using a forest plot. Bivariate regression analyses and 1-way analyses of LVEF coefficient ratios were done to isolate for various clinical and procedural parameters. An analysis of pooled data of the IPoC (n = 674) and control (n = 665) groups showed that IPoC did not significantly impact follow-up LVEF (using standardized mean difference 0.10, 95% confidence interval 0.00 to 0.21). Further analysis showed that IPoC did not improve follow-up LVEF when isolating for relevant clinical and procedural parameters. In conclusion, the use of IPoC as an adjunctive therapy to percutaneous coronary intervention seemingly provides no benefit to left ventricular systolic function, as quantified with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, in patients with acute STEMI with Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow 0 to 1.
缺血后处理(IPoC)是一种被认为可以降低急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者再灌注损伤的技术,尽管其应用存在很大争议。本荟萃分析旨在评估 IPoC 联合经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对急性 STEMI 患者的影响,以心脏磁共振成像测量的随访左心室射血分数(LVEF)作为评估指标。研究人员检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Web of Science 数据库中过去 20 年发表的所有随机对照试验。通过相关检索策略,去除重复后,从在线数据库中识别出 2021 篇文章。纳入的随机对照试验研究了就诊时存在急性 STEMI 和血栓溶解心肌梗死血流 0 到 1 的患者,并使用心脏磁共振成像测量随访 LVEF。共有 11 项研究(n=1339 例患者)符合纳入标准。在每项研究中,对照组与实验组之间无显著差异。使用标准化均数差值比较 IPoC 组和对照组之间的差异,以及 LVEF 的 95%置信区间,并使用森林图进行可视化。对 LVEF 系数比值的二变量回归分析和单向分析用于分离各种临床和程序参数。对 IPoC 组(n=674)和对照组(n=665)的汇总数据进行分析,结果显示 IPoC 对随访 LVEF 无显著影响(使用标准化均数差值 0.10,95%置信区间 0.00 至 0.21)。进一步分析显示,当分离相关临床和程序参数时,IPoC 并不能改善随访 LVEF。综上所述,在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的基础上联合应用 IPoC 似乎不能改善急性 STEMI 患者(血栓溶解心肌梗死血流 0 到 1)的左心室收缩功能,这一结果可以通过心脏磁共振成像来量化。