Karaismailoglu Bedri, Altun Ayse Sena, Subasi Omer, Sharma Siddhartha, Peiffer Matthias, Ashkani-Esfahani Soheil, DiGiovanni Christopher W, Bejarano-Pineda Lorena
Foot & Ankle Research and Innovation Lab (FARIL), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey; CAST (Cerrahpasa Research, Simulation and Design Laboratory), Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bezmi Alem Vakif University, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Foot Ankle Surg. 2024 Feb;30(2):92-98. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2023.09.010. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
The debridement and Achilles tendon reinsertion (DATR) have been the most common surgical approach for the treatment of Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy (IAT), while dorsal closing wedge calcaneal osteotomy (DCWCO) has recently gained popularity as an alternative surgical option. This study aimed to systematically review the published literature on both surgical techniques and compare their clinical outcomes and complication rates.
A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines using Medline, Embase, and Scopus databases. The inclusion criteria encompassed clinical studies reporting functional outcomes and complications, with a minimum of 10 patients and at least 12 months of follow-up.
Seven studies (n = 169) were included for the analysis of DATR, and eight studies (n = 227) were included for the analysis of open DCWCO. Both groups showed a similar improvement in AOFAS score. The overall complication rates were 16.6% in the DATR group and 9.2% in the DCWCO group, but the difference was not statistically significant. However, there was a significantly higher incidence of wound complications in the DATR group (10.1%, 95% C.I.: 4.7-15.6) compared to the DCWCO group (2.5%, 95% C.I.: 0.6-4.4) as the confidence intervals did not overlap.
Clinical outcomes and overall complication rates of both techniques were comparable, although DCWCO had a lower incidence of wound complications. Further research should be focused on prospective studies comparing the two techniques to corroborate the current findings.
Level IV; meta-analysis.
清创及跟腱重新附着术(DATR)一直是治疗跟腱附着点病(IAT)最常用的手术方法,而背侧闭合楔形跟骨截骨术(DCWCO)作为一种替代性手术选择,近年来越来越受欢迎。本研究旨在系统回顾关于这两种手术技术的已发表文献,并比较它们的临床疗效和并发症发生率。
根据PRISMA指南,使用Medline、Embase和Scopus数据库进行系统回顾。纳入标准包括报告功能结局和并发症的临床研究,患者至少10例,随访至少12个月。
纳入7项研究(n = 169)用于DATR分析,纳入8项研究(n = 227)用于开放性DCWCO分析。两组在AOFAS评分上均有相似改善。DATR组的总体并发症发生率为16.6%,DCWCO组为9.2%,但差异无统计学意义。然而,DATR组伤口并发症的发生率(10.1%,95%可信区间:4.7 - 15.6)显著高于DCWCO组(2.5%,95%可信区间:0.6 - 4.4),因为可信区间不重叠。
尽管DCWCO伤口并发症发生率较低,但两种技术的临床疗效和总体并发症发生率相当。进一步的研究应聚焦于比较这两种技术的前瞻性研究,以证实当前的研究结果。
IV级;荟萃分析。