Department of Emergency Medicine, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Department of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Formos Med Assoc. 2024 May;123(5):561-570. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2023.10.008. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: This review aimed to investigate the effect of crew ratios of on-scene advanced life support (ALS)-trained personnel on patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).
We systematically searched PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from the inception date until September 30, 2022, for eligible studies. Two reviewers independently screened the studies for relevance, extracted data, and quality. We compared the effect of the ratio of on-scene ALS-trained personnel >50 % to those with a ratio ≤50 % among prehospital personnel on the clinical outcomes of OHCA patients. The primary outcome was survival-to-discharge and secondary outcomes were any return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), sustained ROSC (≥2 h), and favourable neurological outcome at discharge (cerebral performance category scores: 1 or 2). Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated, and the certainty of evidence was assessed.
From 10,864 references, we identified four non-randomised studies, including 16,475 patients. Two studies were performed in Japan and two in Taiwan. There were significant differences in survival-to-discharge (OR: 1.24, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-1.44, I: 7 %), any ROSC (OR:1.22, 95 % CI: 1.04-1.43, I: 74 %) and sustained ROSC (OR: 1.39, 95 % CI: 1.16-1.65, I: 40 %), but insignificant differences in favourable neurological outcome at discharge. The overall certainty of evidence was rated as very low for all outcomes.
Prehospital ALS care with a ratio of on-scene ALS-trained personnel >50 % could improve OHCA patient outcomes than crew ratios ≤50 %. Further studies are required to reach a robust conclusion.
背景/目的:本综述旨在探讨现场高级生命支持(ALS)培训人员的人员配比对院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者的影响。
我们系统地检索了 PubMed、Ovid EMBASE 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册数据库,检索时间从建库至 2022 年 9 月 30 日,以获取合格的研究。两名评审员独立筛选研究的相关性、提取数据和评估质量。我们比较了现场 ALS 培训人员比例>50%与院前人员比例≤50%对 OHCA 患者临床结局的影响。主要结局是存活至出院,次要结局是任何自主循环恢复(ROSC)、持续 ROSC(≥2 小时)和出院时良好的神经功能结局(脑功能分类评分:1 或 2)。计算了汇总优势比(OR),并评估了证据的确定性。
从 10864 篇参考文献中,我们确定了 4 项非随机研究,共纳入 16475 例患者。其中两项研究在日本进行,两项在台湾进行。在存活至出院(OR:1.24,95%置信区间[CI]:1.07-1.44,I²:7%)、任何 ROSC(OR:1.22,95%CI:1.04-1.43,I²:74%)和持续 ROSC(OR:1.39,95%CI:1.16-1.65,I²:40%)方面存在显著差异,但在出院时的良好神经功能结局方面无显著差异。所有结局的证据总体确定性均被评为极低。
现场 ALS 护理人员比例>50%可能比人员比例≤50%更能改善 OHCA 患者的结局。需要进一步的研究以得出更可靠的结论。