• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高级生命支持培训人员的机组人员比例对院外心脏骤停患者的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effect of crew ratio of advanced life support-trained personnel on patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

Department of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Formos Med Assoc. 2024 May;123(5):561-570. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2023.10.008. Epub 2023 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.jfma.2023.10.008
PMID:37838538
Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: This review aimed to investigate the effect of crew ratios of on-scene advanced life support (ALS)-trained personnel on patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from the inception date until September 30, 2022, for eligible studies. Two reviewers independently screened the studies for relevance, extracted data, and quality. We compared the effect of the ratio of on-scene ALS-trained personnel >50 % to those with a ratio ≤50 % among prehospital personnel on the clinical outcomes of OHCA patients. The primary outcome was survival-to-discharge and secondary outcomes were any return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), sustained ROSC (≥2 h), and favourable neurological outcome at discharge (cerebral performance category scores: 1 or 2). Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated, and the certainty of evidence was assessed.

RESULTS

From 10,864 references, we identified four non-randomised studies, including 16,475 patients. Two studies were performed in Japan and two in Taiwan. There were significant differences in survival-to-discharge (OR: 1.24, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-1.44, I: 7 %), any ROSC (OR:1.22, 95 % CI: 1.04-1.43, I: 74 %) and sustained ROSC (OR: 1.39, 95 % CI: 1.16-1.65, I: 40 %), but insignificant differences in favourable neurological outcome at discharge. The overall certainty of evidence was rated as very low for all outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Prehospital ALS care with a ratio of on-scene ALS-trained personnel >50 % could improve OHCA patient outcomes than crew ratios ≤50 %. Further studies are required to reach a robust conclusion.

摘要

背景/目的:本综述旨在探讨现场高级生命支持(ALS)培训人员的人员配比对院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者的影响。

方法

我们系统地检索了 PubMed、Ovid EMBASE 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册数据库,检索时间从建库至 2022 年 9 月 30 日,以获取合格的研究。两名评审员独立筛选研究的相关性、提取数据和评估质量。我们比较了现场 ALS 培训人员比例>50%与院前人员比例≤50%对 OHCA 患者临床结局的影响。主要结局是存活至出院,次要结局是任何自主循环恢复(ROSC)、持续 ROSC(≥2 小时)和出院时良好的神经功能结局(脑功能分类评分:1 或 2)。计算了汇总优势比(OR),并评估了证据的确定性。

结果

从 10864 篇参考文献中,我们确定了 4 项非随机研究,共纳入 16475 例患者。其中两项研究在日本进行,两项在台湾进行。在存活至出院(OR:1.24,95%置信区间[CI]:1.07-1.44,I²:7%)、任何 ROSC(OR:1.22,95%CI:1.04-1.43,I²:74%)和持续 ROSC(OR:1.39,95%CI:1.16-1.65,I²:40%)方面存在显著差异,但在出院时的良好神经功能结局方面无显著差异。所有结局的证据总体确定性均被评为极低。

结论

现场 ALS 护理人员比例>50%可能比人员比例≤50%更能改善 OHCA 患者的结局。需要进一步的研究以得出更可靠的结论。

相似文献

1
Effect of crew ratio of advanced life support-trained personnel on patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis.高级生命支持培训人员的机组人员比例对院外心脏骤停患者的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2024 May;123(5):561-570. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2023.10.008. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
2
Community first responders for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in adults and children.成人及儿童院外心脏骤停的社区第一响应者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 19;7(7):CD012764. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012764.pub2.
3
Continuous chest compression versus interrupted chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation of non-asphyxial out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.持续胸外按压与间断胸外按压用于非窒息性院外心脏骤停心肺复苏的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 27;3(3):CD010134. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010134.pub2.
4
Association of Prehospital Advanced Life Support by Physician With Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest With Blunt Trauma Following Traffic Collisions: Japanese Registry-Based Study.交通碰撞后钝器创伤致院外心脏骤停患者的院前高级生命支持与生存的相关性:日本注册研究。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Jun 20;153(6):e180674. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0674.
5
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) plus delayed defibrillation versus immediate defibrillation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.院外心脏骤停时心肺复苏(CPR)加延迟除颤与立即除颤的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 12;2014(9):CD009803. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009803.pub2.
6
Effect of timing of advanced life support on out-of-hospital cardiac arrests at home.高级生命支持时机对院外家庭心搏骤停的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Aug;82:94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.05.021. Epub 2024 May 24.
7
Prehospital Advanced Cardiac Life Support for Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Cohort Study.院外心脏骤停的院前高级心脏生命支持:一项队列研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;24(9):1100-1109. doi: 10.1111/acem.13246. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
8
Does care at a cardiac arrest centre improve outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? - A systematic review.心脏骤停中心的护理是否能改善院外心脏骤停后的预后?——系统评价。
Resuscitation. 2019 Apr;137:102-115. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
9
Advanced vs. Basic Life Support in the Treatment of Out-of-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Arrest in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium.复苏结果联盟中院外心搏骤停的高级与基础生命支持治疗。
Resuscitation. 2018 Jul;128:132-137. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.04.031. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
10
Prehospital predictors for return of spontaneous circulation in traumatic cardiac arrest.创伤性心搏骤停患者自主循环恢复的院前预测因素。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Mar 1;92(3):553-560. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003474.