• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗生素药敏导向预防应用及体腔内尿流改道后机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的感染情况。

Infections After Adoption of Antibiogram-directed Prophylaxis and Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion for Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Urology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Eur Urol Focus. 2024 Jul;10(4):612-619. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.09.013. Epub 2023 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2023.09.013
PMID:37838593
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has significantly decreased the morbidity associated with radical cystectomy. However, infectious complications including sepsis, urinary tract (UTIs), wound (WIs), and intra-abdominal (AIs) infections remain common.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) and antibiogram-directed antimicrobial prophylaxis would decrease infections after robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective analysis was performed of a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing RARC between 2014 and 2022 at a tertiary care institution, identifying two groups based on adherence to a prospectively implemented modified ERAS protocol for RARC: modified-ERAS-ICUD and antibiogram-directed ampicillin-sulbactam, gentamicin, and fluconazole prophylaxis were utilized (from January 2019 to present time), and unmodified-ERAS-extracorporeal urinary diversion (UD) and guideline-recommended cephalosporin-based prophylaxis regimen were utilized (from November 2014 to June 2018). Patients receiving other prophylaxis regimens were excluded.

INTERVENTION

ICUD and antibiogram-directed infectious prophylaxis.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary outcome was UTIs within 30 and 90 d postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were WIs, AIs, and sepsis within 30 and 90 d postoperatively, and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) within 90 d postoperatively.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 396 patients were studied (modified-ERAS: 258 [65.2%], unmodified-ERAS: 138 [34.8%]). UD via a neobladder was more common in the modified-ERAS cohort; all other intercohort demographic differences were not statistically different. Comparing cohorts, modified-ERAS had significantly reduced rates of 30-d (7.8% vs 15.9%, p = 0.027) and 90-d UTIs (11.2% vs 25.4%, p = 0.001), and 30-d WIs (1.2% vs. 8.7%, p < 0.001); neither group had a WI after 30 d. Rates of AIs, sepsis, and CDI did not differ between groups. On multivariate regression, the modified-ERAS protocol correlated with a reduced risk of UTIs and WIs (all p < 0.01). The primary limitation is the retrospective study design.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilization of ICUD and antibiogram-based prophylaxis correlates with significantly decreased UTIs and WIs after RARC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this study of infections after robotic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer, we found that intracorporeal (performed entirely inside the body) urinary diversion and an institution-specific antibiogram-directed antibiotic prophylaxis regimen led to fewer urinary tract infections and wound infections at our institution.

摘要

背景

加速康复外科(ERAS)显著降低了根治性膀胱切除术相关的发病率。然而,包括脓毒症、尿路感染(UTIs)、伤口(WIs)和腹腔内(AIs)感染在内的感染性并发症仍然很常见。

目的

评估在机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)中使用腔内尿流改道术(ICUD)和基于抗生素药敏试验的预防性抗菌药物是否会降低感染率。

设计、地点和参与者:对 2014 年至 2022 年在一家三级医疗机构接受 RARC 的患者前瞻性维护数据库进行回顾性分析,根据是否遵守前瞻性实施的 RARC 改良 ERAS 方案将患者分为两组:改良-ERAS-ICUD 和基于抗生素药敏试验的氨苄西林-舒巴坦、庆大霉素和氟康唑预防性治疗(自 2019 年 1 月至今),以及未改良-ERAS-腔外尿流改道(UD)和指南推荐的头孢菌素类为基础的预防方案(自 2014 年 11 月至 2018 年 6 月)。排除接受其他预防方案的患者。

干预措施

ICUD 和基于抗生素药敏试验的感染预防。

观察指标和统计学分析

主要观察指标是术后 30 天和 90 天的 UTIs。次要观察指标是术后 30 天和 90 天的 WIs、AIs 和脓毒症,以及术后 90 天的艰难梭菌感染(CDI)。

结果和局限性

共研究了 396 例患者(改良-ERAS:258 例[65.2%],未改良-ERAS:138 例[34.8%])。改良-ERAS 组更常使用新膀胱的 UD;两组间其他组间人口统计学差异无统计学意义。与对照组相比,改良-ERAS 组 30 天(7.8% vs. 15.9%,p=0.027)和 90 天 UTIs (11.2% vs. 25.4%,p=0.001)和 30 天 WIs (1.2% vs. 8.7%,p<0.001)的发生率明显降低;两组均无 30 天后的 WI。两组间 AIs、脓毒症和 CDI 发生率无差异。多变量回归分析显示,改良-ERAS 方案与降低 UTIs 和 WIs 的风险相关(均 p<0.01)。主要限制是回顾性研究设计。

结论

在 RARC 中使用 ICUD 和基于抗生素药敏试验的预防性抗菌药物与显著降低 RARC 术后 UTIs 和 WIs 相关。

患者总结

在这项研究中,我们发现膀胱癌机器人根治性膀胱切除术后,使用腔内尿流改道术和基于机构的抗生素药敏试验指导的抗生素预防方案可导致尿路感染和伤口感染减少。

相似文献

1
Infections After Adoption of Antibiogram-directed Prophylaxis and Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion for Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy.抗生素药敏导向预防应用及体腔内尿流改道后机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的感染情况。
Eur Urol Focus. 2024 Jul;10(4):612-619. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.09.013. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
2
Analysis of intracorporeal compared with extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后的体内与体外尿流改道术比较分析:来自国际机器人膀胱切除术联盟的数据。
Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):340-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.042. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
3
A comparative propensity score-matched analysis of perioperative outcomes of intracorporeal vs extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后腔内与腔外尿流改道术的围手术期结局的倾向性评分匹配分析:来自国际机器人膀胱切除术联盟的结果。
BJU Int. 2020 Aug;126(2):265-272. doi: 10.1111/bju.15083. Epub 2020 May 16.
4
Comparison of perioperative outcomes and complications of robot assisted radical cystectomy with extracorporeal vs intracorporeal urinary diversion.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术采用体外与体内尿流改道术的围手术期结果及并发症比较。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2019 Jul-Aug;43(6):277-283. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
5
Safe transition from extracorporeal to intracorporeal urinary diversion following robot-assisted cystectomy: a recipe for reducing operative time, blood loss and complication rates.机器人辅助膀胱切除术后从体外到体内尿流改道的安全过渡:降低手术时间、出血量和并发症发生率的秘诀。
World J Urol. 2019 Feb;37(2):367-372. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2386-4. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
6
Perioperative outcomes and complications of intracorporeal vs extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a real-life, multi-institutional french study.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后膀胱癌患者行体腔内与体腔外尿流改道术的围手术期结局和并发症:一项真实世界、多机构的法国研究。
World J Urol. 2018 Nov;36(11):1711-1718. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2313-8. Epub 2018 May 9.
7
Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy with Totally Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: 3-Year Outcomes from a Randomised Controlled Trial.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合完全腔内尿路转流与开放性根治性膀胱切除术的比较:一项随机对照试验的 3 年结果。
Eur Urol. 2024 May;85(5):422-430. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.01.018. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
8
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion decreases postoperative complications only in highly comorbid patients: findings that rely on a standardized methodology recommended by the European Association of Urology Guidelines.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合体内尿流改道术仅在高度合并症患者中可降低术后并发症:这一发现基于欧洲泌尿外科学会指南推荐的标准化方法。
World J Urol. 2021 Mar;39(3):803-812. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03237-5. Epub 2020 May 17.
9
Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.开放性根治性膀胱切除术与机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1042-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.043. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
10
Impact of an enhanced recovery protocol in frail patients after intracorporeal urinary diversion.增强型康复方案对体内尿分流术后虚弱患者的影响。
BJU Int. 2024 Sep;134(3):426-433. doi: 10.1111/bju.16340. Epub 2024 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and external validation of a nomogram for predicting sepsis following flexible ureteroscopy.预测输尿管软镜检查后脓毒症的列线图的开发与外部验证
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Jun 13;30(1):479. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02754-6.
2
Impacts of enhanced recovery after surgery nursing interventions on wound infection and complications following bladder cancer surgery: A meta-analysis.手术康复加强护理干预对膀胱癌手术后伤口感染和并发症的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2024 Apr;21(4):e14781. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14781.