Division of Orthodontics, Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
J World Fed Orthod. 2023 Dec;12(6):245-250. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2023.09.002. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
Although available evidence suggests that orthodontic appliances can impact quality of life, there is limited information on the impact of orthodontic appliances on sleep quality. This study aimed to compare sleep quality between patients undergoing orthodontic treatments using conventional fixed appliances and clear aligners.
Adult patients attending clinics in Saudi Arabia participated in this cross-sectional study. Sleep quality was assessed using the validated Arabic version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Statistical significance was determined using inferential analysis, with a P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
There were 69 patients included in the study. The average age of a patient (33.12 ± 8.1) who received the clear aligner was significantly higher than those who received the fixed appliance (27.7 ± 5.9) (P < 0.05). The variation in the average score of ESS because of the education level was found to be statistically significant (P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed between the mean average ESS and PSQI global scores across the two orthodontic treatment groups. The average sleep latency scores were significantly higher in females than males when analyzing the PSQI component score across sex (P < 0.05). In education, ESS, PSQI global, habitual sleep efficiency, the use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction had a positive, weak, but significant correlation.
Overall, this study concluded that regardless of the orthodontic appliances used, there was no statistically significant difference in sleep quality during the treatment.
尽管现有证据表明正畸矫治器会影响生活质量,但关于正畸矫治器对睡眠质量影响的信息有限。本研究旨在比较使用传统固定矫治器和透明牙套进行正畸治疗的患者的睡眠质量。
沙特阿拉伯诊所的成年患者参与了这项横断面研究。使用经过验证的阿拉伯语版匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)和埃普沃思嗜睡量表(ESS)评估睡眠质量。使用推断分析确定统计学意义,P<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。
研究纳入了 69 名患者。接受透明牙套的患者的平均年龄(33.12±8.1)明显高于接受固定矫治器的患者(27.7±5.9)(P<0.05)。由于教育水平的不同,ESS 的平均评分变化具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在这两种正畸治疗组中,ESS 和 PSQI 全球评分的平均平均得分之间没有观察到显著差异。在分析跨性别 PSQI 成分评分时,女性的平均睡眠潜伏期评分明显高于男性(P<0.05)。在教育、ESS、PSQI 全球评分、习惯性睡眠效率、使用睡眠药物和日间功能障碍方面,存在正相关,但相关性较弱,具有统计学意义。
总体而言,本研究得出结论,无论使用哪种正畸矫治器,在治疗期间睡眠质量均无统计学差异。