Suppr超能文献

甲状腺乳头状癌侵犯气管患者的手术策略:气管袖状切除端端吻合术与开窗切除气管皮肤造瘘术的比较

Surgical strategy for patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma invading the trachea: a comparison of tracheal sleeve resection with end-to-end anastomosis and window resection with tracheocutaneous fistula.

作者信息

Inoue Yukari, Ebina Aya, Toda Kazuhisa, Shimbashi Wataru, Yamada Keiko, Mitani Hiroki, Tanaka Yasuhiro, Sugitani Iwao

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.

Department of Endocrine Surgery, Nippon Medical School Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Gland Surg. 2023 Sep 25;12(9):1167-1178. doi: 10.21037/gs-23-171. Epub 2023 Sep 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sleeve resection with end-to-end anastomosis (Procedure A) and window resection with a tracheocutaneous fistula (Procedure B) are the major surgical procedures for patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) exhibiting transluminal tracheal invasion. For each procedure, the indications, postoperative course, and treatment results were examined retrospectively.

METHODS

Of 1,456 patients with PTC (maximum tumor diameter >1 cm) who received initial treatment between 1993 and 2013, we reviewed 51 patients. Of these 51 cases, 45 showed full-layer tracheal invasion, and 6 did not reach the tracheal mucosa, but required full-layer tracheal resection. Twenty-four patients underwent Procedure A, and 27 patients underwent Procedure B.

RESULTS

Regarding surgical procedure selection, Procedure B was selected significantly more frequently than Procedure A for cases with preoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy, tumor invasion of the esophagus, clinical lymph node metastasis, or a large number of resected tracheal rings. Postoperative airway-related complications were not significantly different between the procedures, but decreased with the use of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM). The postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer for Procedure B than for Procedure A. In addition, the rate of a permanent postoperative tracheostoma was higher with Procedure B than with Procedure A. Local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) did not differ significantly between the two procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Certain patients may benefit from Procedure A with IONM in terms of a shorter hospital stay and avoiding the need for a permanent tracheostoma. Although Procedure B was indicated for patients with more advanced disease than Procedure A, treatment outcomes were similar.

摘要

背景

对于表现为气管腔内侵犯的乳头状甲状腺癌(PTC)患者,端对端吻合的袖状切除术(术式A)和气管造瘘开窗切除术(术式B)是主要的外科手术方式。对每种术式的适应证、术后病程及治疗结果进行了回顾性研究。

方法

在1993年至2013年接受初始治疗的1456例PTC患者(最大肿瘤直径>1 cm)中,我们回顾了51例。在这51例病例中,45例显示气管全层侵犯,6例未累及气管黏膜,但需要气管全层切除。24例患者接受了术式A,27例患者接受了术式B。

结果

关于手术方式的选择,对于术前喉返神经(RLN)麻痹、肿瘤侵犯食管、临床淋巴结转移或切除气管环数量较多的病例,术式B的选择频率显著高于术式A。两种术式术后气道相关并发症无显著差异,但术中神经监测(IONM)的使用使其有所减少。术式B的术后住院时间显著长于术式A。此外,术式B术后永久性气管造口的发生率高于术式A。两种术式的局部无复发生存率(LRFS)和病因特异性生存率(CSS)无显著差异。

结论

某些患者可能从采用IONM的术式A中获益,住院时间较短且无需永久性气管造口。尽管术式B适用于比术式A病情更严重的患者,但治疗结果相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b51c/10570975/32dc9b37a3b2/gs-12-09-1167-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验