Karlovich Ashley R, Shaughnessy Shannon, Simmons Kate, Evans Spencer C
University of Miami, Department of Psychology.
J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2023 Oct;132(7):820-832. doi: 10.1037/abn0000870.
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) descriptive criterial approach to diagnosis has been criticized for contributing to comorbidity, heterogeneity within conditions, and nonspecificity across conditions. Much research has examined comorbidity and heterogeneity, but less is known about nonspecificity. Here, we examined two nonspecific symptoms: irritability and sleep disturbance. Both are common, clinically significant, and appear in several DSM disorder criteria sets, but their transdiagnostic prevalence is unknown. Leveraging a nationally representative epidemiological study of adolescents (n = 10,148; ages = 13-18), we first identified all instances where irritability or sleep disturbance appears in DSM-5-TR criteria for bipolar, depressive, anxiety, traumatic stress, or disruptive/impulse-control disorders; then found their DSM-IV equivalents in study variables; and finally estimated their prevalence individually and cumulatively across categories. Weighted lifetime prevalence estimates were 79.5% (95% CI [77.8, 81.2]) for irritability and 60.8% [58.7, 62.9] for sleep disturbance. Associations with age and gender were significant but small. Most youth reported multiple symptoms of irritability (weighted M = 3.04, Mdn = 2) and at least one symptom of sleep disturbance (weighted M = 1.61, Mdn = 1). Both problems were extremely common among individuals with specific disorders but were underestimated by the criteria for those conditions. Results suggest that the high prevalence of DSM-defined irritability and sleep problems may be obfuscated by these symptoms being scattered across diagnostic entities. There is a need for more research on assessing, treating, and understanding problems related to irritability and sleep in their own right, cutting across, rather than confined to, particular diagnoses. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)的诊断描述性标准方法因导致共病、病症内的异质性以及病症间的非特异性而受到批评。许多研究都探讨了共病和异质性,但对于非特异性的了解较少。在此,我们研究了两种非特异性症状:易激惹和睡眠障碍。这两种症状都很常见,具有临床意义,且出现在多个DSM病症标准集中,但它们的跨诊断患病率尚不清楚。利用一项具有全国代表性的青少年流行病学研究(n = 10,148;年龄 = 13 - 18岁),我们首先确定了易激惹或睡眠障碍出现在DSM - 5 - TR中双相情感障碍、抑郁障碍、焦虑障碍、创伤应激障碍或破坏/冲动控制障碍标准中的所有情况;然后在研究变量中找到它们在DSM - IV中的对应情况;最后分别并累计估计它们在各个类别中的患病率。易激惹的加权终生患病率估计为79.5%(95%置信区间[77.8, 81.2]),睡眠障碍为60.8%[58.7, 62.9]。与年龄和性别的关联显著但较小。大多数青少年报告有多种易激惹症状(加权均值M = 3.04,中位数Mdn = 2)和至少一种睡眠障碍症状(加权均值M = 1.61,中位数Mdn = 1)。这两个问题在患有特定病症的个体中极为常见,但这些病症的标准对其估计不足。结果表明,DSM定义的易激惹和睡眠问题的高患病率可能因这些症状分散在不同诊断实体中而被掩盖。有必要开展更多研究,以独立地评估、治疗和理解与易激惹和睡眠相关的问题,这些问题跨越而非局限于特定诊断。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023美国心理学会,保留所有权利)