Division of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Sensengasse 2A, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Austrian Research Group for Regenerative and Orthopedic Medicine (AURROM), Vienna, Austria.
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Nov;27(11):6493-6502. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05254-1. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) application following subgingival instrumentation of residual pockets in periodontitis patients on inflammatory host response, microbiological composition, and clinical outcome.
In this double-blinded randomized controlled trial, a total of 22 patients with generalized periodontitis stage III or IV presenting with ≥ 6 mm probing pocket depth (PPD) at re-evaluation after initial periodontal therapy were included. Participants were randomly allocated at a 1:1 ratio to subgingival instrumentation with (EMD +) or without (EMD-) non-surgical EMD application into the pocket. PPD, clinical attachment level (CAL), bleeding on probing (BoP), plaque index (PI), as well as a panel of pro-inflammatory cytokines and periodontal pathogen count in the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) of the respective sites were evaluated at baseline (T0) and six months afterwards (T1).
Both treatment groups showed a significant PPD reduction (EMD + 1.33 ± 1.15 mm, p < 0.001; EMD- 1.32 ± 1.01 mm, p < 0.001) as well as CAL gain (EMD + 1.13 ± 1.58 mm, p < 0.001; EMD- 0.47 ± 1.06 mm, p = 0.005) from T0 to T1. While no intergroup differences for PPD reduction were observed, CAL gain was higher in EMD + sites compared to EMD- (p = 0.009). No essential effects on cytokine expression as well as bacterial count were detected.
Application of EMD as an adjunct to subgingival instrumentation of residual pockets yielded benefits regarding CAL gain; however, effects on PPD reduction, inflammatory cytokines, and bacterial count were negligible.
ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04449393), registration date 26/06/2020.
Based on the obtained results, additional non-surgical EMD application compared to subgingival instrumentation alone showed no clinically relevant effects on treatment outcome and underlying biological mechanisms.
本研究旨在评估在牙周炎患者接受牙周袋内根面平整术后应用釉基质衍生物(EMD)对炎症宿主反应、微生物组成和临床疗效的影响。
在这项双盲随机对照试验中,共有 22 名患有 III 期或 IV 期广泛性牙周炎的患者,在初始牙周治疗后重新评估时出现≥6mm 的探诊袋深(PPD),被纳入研究。将这些患者按 1:1 的比例随机分配到牙周袋内根面平整术加(EMD+)或不加(EMD-)非手术 EMD 应用组。在基线(T0)和 6 个月后(T1)评估 PPD、临床附着水平(CAL)、探诊出血(BoP)、菌斑指数(PI)以及龈沟液(GCF)中一组促炎细胞因子和牙周致病菌的计数。
两组治疗组的 PPD 均显著降低(EMD+组 1.33±1.15mm,p<0.001;EMD-组 1.32±1.01mm,p<0.001),CAL 也显著增加(EMD+组 1.13±1.58mm,p<0.001;EMD-组 0.47±1.06mm,p=0.005)。从 T0 到 T1,两组间 PPD 降低无明显差异,但 EMD+组的 CAL 增加明显高于 EMD-组(p=0.009)。对细胞因子表达和细菌计数均未观察到显著影响。
将 EMD 作为牙周袋内根面平整术的辅助手段,可在 CAL 增加方面带来益处;然而,在 PPD 降低、炎症细胞因子和细菌计数方面的效果则微不足道。
ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT04449393),注册日期为 2020 年 6 月 26 日。
根据所得结果,与单纯牙周袋内根面平整术相比,额外应用非手术 EMD 对治疗效果和潜在生物学机制没有明显的临床影响。