Discipline of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Discipline of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Clin Periodontol. 2024 Jan;51(1):14-23. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13891. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
This investigation aimed to evaluate the 1-year survival of implants placed after staged lateral alveolar ridge augmentation using equine-derived collagenated xenogeneic bone blocks (CXBBs) or autogenous bone block (ABB).
Fifty patients who underwent lateral augmentation in a previous trial were included. The primary outcome measure was implant survival at the 1-year follow-up, and secondary outcomes included implant success, peri-implant clinical and volumetric parameters, pink aesthetic scores (PES) and patient-reported outcome measures. Data analysis involved Fisher's exact test, the Mann-Whitney U-test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
In this study, no late implant failures were observed. The cumulative survival rates were 78.6% for the CXBB group and 90.9% for the ABB group, with no difference between the groups. Similarly, the success rates were 53.6% and 63.6%, respectively, showing no significant difference. Peri-implant clinical and volumetric parameters indicated the presence of healthy peri-implant tissues surrounding implants placed in both CXBB- and ABB-augmented sites. PES were 8.5 and 11.0 for implants placed in CXBB- and ABB-augmented sites, respectively. Furthermore, patient satisfaction rates were high and similar between the groups.
Dental implants placed in both CXBB- and ABB-augmented ridges demonstrated no statistically significant differences in clinical, volumetric and aesthetic outcomes, along with high patient satisfaction rates.
本研究旨在评估使用马源性胶原异种骨块(CXBB)或自体骨块(ABB)进行分步外侧牙槽嵴增高后种植体的 1 年存活率。
本研究纳入了先前试验中接受外侧增强的 50 名患者。主要观察指标为 1 年随访时的种植体存活率,次要观察指标包括种植体成功率、种植体周围临床和体积参数、粉色美学评分(PES)和患者报告的结果测量。数据分析采用 Fisher 确切检验、Mann-Whitney U 检验和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验。
本研究中未观察到晚期种植体失败。CXBB 组的累积存活率为 78.6%,ABB 组为 90.9%,两组间无差异。同样,成功率分别为 53.6%和 63.6%,也无显著差异。种植体周围临床和体积参数表明,在 CXBB 和 ABB 增强部位植入的种植体周围均存在健康的种植体组织。植入 CXBB 和 ABB 增强部位的种植体 PES 分别为 8.5 和 11.0。此外,两组患者的满意度均较高且相似。
在 CXBB 和 ABB 增强的牙槽嵴中植入的牙种植体在临床、体积和美学结果方面没有统计学上的显著差异,同时患者满意度也较高。