Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, USA.
Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA.
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2024 Apr;58(3):263-279. doi: 10.1177/15385744231207014. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
Carotid bifurcation stenosis may co-exist simultaneously with more proximal common carotid artery (CCA) atherosclerotic plaquing, primarily at the vessel origin in the aortic arch. This scenario is relatively infrequent and its' management does not have quality randomized data to support medical vs surgical treatment. It is logical to treat any high grade common carotid lesions proximal to a carotid bifurcation endarterectomy (CEA) site both to prevent perioperative emboli or thrombosis as well as future embolization. Prior long-term investigations of the combined treatment paradigm have been low volume analysis. Further, prior studies focus on perioperative outcomes with respect to stroke prevention. The only prior VQI study investigating mid-term outcomes following simultaneous CEA with proximal CCA endovascular therapy provided data on less than 10 patients beyond 1.5 years. The long-term follow-up (LFTU) component initiative within VQI has been emphasized in recent years, now allowing for much more robust LTFU analysis.
Four cohorts were created for perioperative outcome analysis and Kaplan Meier freedom from event analysis: CEA in isolation for asymptomatic disease; CEA in isolation for symptomatic patients; CEA with proximal CCA endovascular intervention for asymptomatic; and, CEA with proximal CCA intervention for symptomatic patients. Binary logistic multivariable regression was performed for perioperative neurological event and 90-day mortality risk determination and Cox multivariable regression analysis was performed for long term freedom from cumulative ischemic neurological event and long-term mortality analysis. Symptomatology and type of surgery (CEA with or without CCA intervention) were individual variables in the multivariable analysis. Neurological ischemic event in this study encompassed transient ischemic attack (TIA) and stroke combined.
We noted a statistically significant ( < .001) escalation in rates of perioperative neurological event, myocardial infarction (MI), carotid re-exploration, 90 day mortality and combined neurological event and 90 day mortality moving from: A) asymptomatic CEA in isolation to B) symptomatic CEA in isolation to C) asymptomatic CEA combined with proximal CCA intervention to D) symptomatic CEA in combination with proximal CCA intervention. The positivity rate for the combined outcome of perioperative ischemic neurological event and 90 day mortality was 2.2% amongst asymptomatic CEA in isolation, 4.1% amongst symptomatic CEA in isolation, 4.4% amongst asymptomatic CEA in combination with proximal CCA intervention; and 8.8% in patients with symptomatic lesions undergoing combined CEA with proximal CCA intervention. On multivariable analysis patients undergoing CEA with proximal CCA endovascular intervention experienced greater risk for perioperative neurological ischemic event (aOR 2.03, 1.43-2.90, < .001), combined perioperative neurological ischemic event and 90 day mortality (aOR 2.13, 1.62-2.80, < .001), long term mortality (HR 1.62, 1.12-2.29, < .001), and cumulative neurological ischemic event in long term follow up (HR 1.62, 1.12-2.29, = .007). Amongst 4395 cumulative ischemic neurological events in all study patients, 34% were TIA.
Carotid bifurcation endarterectomy in combination with proximal endovascular common carotid artery intervention caries an over two fold higher perioperative risk of neurologic ischemic event and 90 day mortality relative to CEA in isolation for asymptomatic and symptomatic cohorts respectively. After surgery, freedom from cerebral ischemia and mortality for patients undergoing dual intervention is closely aligned with patients undergoing CEA in isolation. Despite high adverse perioperative event rates for the combined CEA and CCA treatment, there is likely long term stroke reduction and mortality benefit to this approach in symptomatic patients based on the event free rates seen herein after initial hospital discharge. The benefit of treating asymptomatic tandem ICA and CCA lesions remains vague but the 4.4% perioperative neurologic event and death rate suggests that these patients would be better managed with medical therapy.
颈动脉分叉处狭窄可能同时存在更靠近颈总动脉(CCA)的粥样斑块,主要位于主动脉弓处的血管起源处。这种情况相对少见,其治疗方法没有高质量的随机数据来支持药物治疗与手术治疗。在颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)部位近端治疗任何高级别颈总动脉病变都是合理的,既能预防围手术期栓塞或血栓形成,又能预防未来的栓塞。先前对联合治疗模式的长期研究分析样本量较少。此外,先前的研究主要关注围手术期的卒中预防结果。之前唯一一项关于同时进行 CEA 和近端 CCA 血管内治疗的 VQI 研究,提供了 1.5 年以上不到 10 例患者的中期结果数据。VQI 近年来强调了长期随访(LFTU)部分,现在可以进行更稳健的 LFTU 分析。
为了进行围手术期结果分析和 Kaplan-Meier 无事件分析,我们创建了四个队列:无症状疾病的 CEA 孤立治疗;有症状患者的 CEA 孤立治疗;无症状患者的 CEA 联合近端 CCA 血管内干预;有症状患者的 CEA 联合近端 CCA 干预。对围手术期神经事件和 90 天死亡率风险进行二元逻辑多变量回归,对长期无累积缺血性神经事件和长期死亡率进行 Cox 多变量回归分析。症状和手术类型(CEA 联合或不联合 CCA 干预)是多变量分析中的独立变量。本研究中的神经缺血性事件包括短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)和卒中。
我们注意到,随着:A)无症状 CEA 孤立治疗,B)有症状 CEA 孤立治疗,C)无症状 CEA 联合近端 CCA 干预,D)有症状 CEA 联合近端 CCA 干预,围手术期神经事件、心肌梗死(MI)、颈动脉再探查、90 天死亡率以及累积神经事件和 90 天死亡率的发生率均呈显著(<0.001)上升趋势。无症状 CEA 孤立治疗患者的围手术期缺血性神经事件和 90 天死亡率联合阳性率为 2.2%,有症状 CEA 孤立治疗患者为 4.1%,无症状 CEA 联合近端 CCA 干预患者为 4.4%,有症状病变患者联合 CEA 加近端 CCA 干预患者为 8.8%。多变量分析显示,接受 CEA 联合近端 CCA 血管内干预的患者围手术期发生神经缺血性事件的风险更高(优势比 2.03,1.43-2.90,<0.001),联合围手术期神经缺血性事件和 90 天死亡率的风险更高(优势比 2.13,1.62-2.80,<0.001),长期死亡率(风险比 1.62,1.12-2.29,<0.001),以及长期随访中的累积神经缺血性事件(风险比 1.62,1.12-2.29,=0.007)。在所有研究患者的 4395 例累积缺血性神经事件中,34%为 TIA。
与无症状和有症状队列的 CEA 孤立治疗相比,颈动脉分叉处内膜切除术联合近端血管内颈总动脉干预的围手术期神经缺血性事件和 90 天死亡率的风险增加一倍以上。手术后,接受双重干预的患者在脑缺血和死亡率方面的无事件生存率与单独接受 CEA 的患者相似。尽管联合 CEA 和 CCA 治疗的围手术期不良事件发生率较高,但根据初始出院后的无事件生存率,该方法可能对有症状患者有长期降低卒中和死亡率的益处。治疗无症状串联 ICA 和 CCA 病变的益处仍不清楚,但 4.4%的围手术期神经事件和死亡率提示这些患者可能通过药物治疗得到更好的管理。