Li L L, Li H, Li J, Zhang X B, Wang Z Q, Shen D H, Wang J L
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
Department of Pathology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Oct 25;58(10):733-741. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20230317-00125.
To investigate the relationships between molecular types of the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) of patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC) and lymph node metastasis and other clinicopathological features. The clinical pathological information of 295 patients with EC who underwent initial inpatient surgical treatment and accepted the detection of the molecular types of TCGA with next-generation sequencing technology at Peking University People's Hospital were collected during April 2016 and May 2022. The TCGA molecular typing of EC was divided into four types: POLE-ultramutated (15 cases), high microsatellite instability (MSI-H; 50 cases), copy-number low (CNL; 175 cases), and copy-number high (CNH; 55 cases). The differences of clinical pathological features among different molecular types and the risk factors of lymph node metastasis were analyzed retrospectively. Among 295 patients with EC, the average age was (56.9±0.6) years. (1) There was a statistically significant difference in lymph node metastasis (0, 8.0%, 10.3% and 25.5%) among the four molecular types (=12.524, =0.006). There were significant differences in age, stage, pathological type, grade (only endometrioid carcinoma), myometrium invasion, lymphatic vascular space infiltration, and estrogen receptor among the EC patients of four molecular types (all <0.05). Among them, while in the patients with CNH type, the pathological grade was G, the pathological type was non-endometrioid carcinoma, and the proportion of myographic infiltration depth ≥1/2 were higher (all <0.05). (2) Univariate analysis suggested that pathological type, grade, myometrium infiltration depth, cervical interstitial infiltration, lymphatic vascular space infiltration, and progesterone receptor were all factors which significantly influence lymph node metastasis (all <0.01); multivariate analysis suggested that the lymphatic vascular space infiltration was an independent risk factor for lymph node metastasis (=5.884, 95%: 1.633-21.211; =0.007). (3) The factors related to lymph node metastasis were different in patients with different molecular types. In the patients with MSI-H, the non-endometrioid carcinoma of pathological type was independent risk factor for lymph node metastasis (=29.010, 95%: 2.067-407.173; 0.012). In the patients with CNL, myometrium infiltration depth≥1/2 (=4.995, 95%: 1.225-20.376; =0.025), lymphatic vascular space infiltration (=14.577, 95%: 3.603-58.968; <0.001) were the independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis. While in the CNH type patients pathological type of non-endometrioid carcinoma (=7.451, 95%: 1.127-49.281; =0.037), cervical interstitial infiltration (=22.938, 95%: 1.207-436.012; =0.037), lymphatic vascular space infiltration (=9.404, 95%: 1.609-54.969; =0.013), were the independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis. POLE-ultramutated EC patients have the lowest risk of lymph node metastasis, and CNH patients have the highest risk of lymph node metastasis. The risk factors of lymph node metastasis of different molecular types are different. According to preoperative pathological and imaging data, lymph node metastasis is more likely to occur in patients with non-endometrioid carcinoma in MSI-H and CNH type patients, and lymph node metastasis is more likely to occur in patients with myometrium infiltration depth ≥1/2 in CNL type patients.
探讨子宫内膜癌(EC)患者癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)分子类型与淋巴结转移及其他临床病理特征之间的关系。收集2016年4月至2022年5月期间在北京大学人民医院接受初次住院手术治疗并采用下一代测序技术接受TCGA分子类型检测的295例EC患者的临床病理信息。EC的TCGA分子分型分为四种类型:POLE超突变型(15例)、高微卫星不稳定性(MSI-H;50例)、拷贝数低(CNL;175例)和拷贝数高(CNH;55例)。回顾性分析不同分子类型临床病理特征的差异及淋巴结转移的危险因素。295例EC患者中,平均年龄为(56.9±0.6)岁。(1)四种分子类型之间的淋巴结转移情况(0、8.0%、10.3%和25.5%)存在统计学显著差异(=12.524,=0.006)。四种分子类型的EC患者在年龄、分期、病理类型、分级(仅子宫内膜样癌)、肌层浸润、淋巴管间隙浸润和雌激素受体方面存在显著差异(均<0.05)。其中,CNH型患者的病理分级为G级,病理类型为非子宫内膜样癌,肌层浸润深度≥1/2的比例更高(均<0.05)。(2)单因素分析表明,病理类型、分级、肌层浸润深度、宫颈间质浸润、淋巴管间隙浸润和孕激素受体均是显著影响淋巴结转移的因素(均<0.01);多因素分析表明,淋巴管间隙浸润是淋巴结转移的独立危险因素(=5.884,95%:1.633-21.211;=0.007)。(3)不同分子类型患者中与淋巴结转移相关的因素不同。在MSI-H患者中,病理类型为非子宫内膜样癌是淋巴结转移的独立危险因素(=29.010,95%:2.067-407.173;0.012)。在CNL患者中,肌层浸润深度≥1/2(=4.995,95%:1.225-20.376;=0.025)、淋巴管间隙浸润(=14.577,95%:3.603-58.968;<0.001)是淋巴结转移的独立危险因素。而在CNH型患者中,病理类型为非子宫内膜样癌(=7.451,95%:1.127-49.281;=0.037)、宫颈间质浸润(=22.938,95%:1.207-436.012;=0.037)、淋巴管间隙浸润(=9.404,95%:1.609-54.969;=0.013)是淋巴结转移的独立危险因素。POLE超突变型EC患者淋巴结转移风险最低,CNH患者淋巴结转移风险最高。不同分子类型的淋巴结转移危险因素不同。根据术前病理和影像资料,MSI-H和CNH型患者中非子宫内膜样癌患者更易发生淋巴结转移,CNL型患者中肌层浸润深度≥1/2的患者更易发生淋巴结转移。