Liu Y, Wang Y X, Sun X J, Ting X, Wu R, Liu X D, Liu C R
Department of Pathology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Third Hospital, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Oct 25;58(10):755-765. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20230711-00316.
To explore the concordance and causes of different mismatch repair (MMR) and microsatellite instability (MSI) detection results in endometrial carcinoma (EC) molecular typing. A total of 214 EC patients diagnosed from January 2021 to April 2023 were selected at the Department of Pathology, Peking University Third Hospital. The immunohistochemistry (IHC) results of MMR protein were reviewed. Tumor specific somatic mutations, MMR germline mutations, microsatellite scores and tumor mutation burden (TMB) were detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS) with multi-gene panel. Methylation-specific PCR was used to detect the methylation status of MLH1 gene promoter in cases with deficient MLH1 protein expression. In cases with discrepant results between MMR-IHC and MSI-NGS, the MSI status was detected again by PCR (MSI-PCR), and the molecular typing was determined by combining the results of TMB and MLH1 gene promoter methylation. (1) In this study, there were 22 cases of POLE gene mutation subtype, 55 cases of mismatch repair deficient (MMR-d) subtype, 29 cases of p53 abnormal subtype, and 108 cases of no specific molecular profile (NSMP). The median age at diagnosis of MMR-d subtype (54 years old) and the proportion of aggressive histological types (40.0%, 22/55) were higher than those of NSMP subtype [50 years old and 12.0% (13/108) respectively; all <0.05]. (2) Among 214 patients, MMR-IHC test showed that 153 patients were mismatch repair proficient (MMR-p), 49 patients were MMR-d, and 12 patients were difficult to evaluate directly. MSI-NGS showed that 164 patients were microsatellite stable (MSS; equal to MMR-p), 48 patients were high microsatellite instability (MSI-H; equal to MMR-d), and 2 patients had no MSI-NGS results because the effective sequencing depth did not meet the quality control. The overall concordance between MMR-IHC and MSI-NGS was 94.3% (200/212). All the 12 discrepant cases were MMR-d or subclonal loss of MMR protein by IHC, but MSS by NGS. Among them, 10 cases were loss or subclonal loss of MLH1 and (or) PMS2 protein. Three discrepant cases were classified as POLE gene mutation subtype. In the remaining 9 cases, 5 cases and 3 cases were confirmed as MSI-H and low microsatellite instability (MSI-L) respectively by MSI-PCR, 6 cases were detected as MLH1 gene promoter methylation and 7 cases demonstrated high TMB (>10 mutations/Mb). These 9 cases were classified as MMR-d EC. (3) Lynch syndrome was diagnosed in 27.3% (15/55) of all 55 MMR-d EC cases, and the TMB of EC with MSH2 and (or) MSH6 protein loss or associated with Lynch syndrome [(71.0±26.2) and (71.5±20.1) mutations/Mb respectively] were significantly higher than those of EC with MLH1 and (or) PMS2 loss or sporadic MMR-d EC [(38.2±19.1) and (41.9±24.3) mutations/Mb respectively, all <0.01]. The top 10 most frequently mutated genes in MMR-d EC were PTEN (85.5%, 47/55), ARID1A (80.0%, 44/55), PIK3CA (69.1%, 38/55), KMT2B (60.0%, 33/55), CTCF (45.5%, 25/55), RNF43 (40.0%, 22/55), KRAS (36.4%, 20/55), CREBBP (34.5%, 19/55), LRP1B (32.7%, 18/55) and BRCA2 (32.7%, 18/55). Concurrent PTEN, ARID1A and PIK3CA gene mutations were found in 50.9% (28/55) of MMR-d EC patients. The concordance of MMR-IHC and MSI-NGS in EC is relatively high.The discordance in a few MMR-d EC are mostly found in cases with MLH1 and (or) PMS2 protein loss or MMR protein subclonal staining caused by MLH1 gene promoter hypermethylation. In order to provide accurate molecular typing for EC patients, MLH1 gene methylation, MSI-PCR, MMR gene germline mutation and TMB should be combined to comprehensively evaluate MMR and MSI status.
探讨子宫内膜癌(EC)分子分型中不同错配修复(MMR)和微卫星不稳定性(MSI)检测结果的一致性及原因。选取2021年1月至2023年4月在北京大学第三医院病理科确诊的214例EC患者。回顾MMR蛋白的免疫组化(IHC)结果。采用多基因panel二代测序(NGS)检测肿瘤特异性体细胞突变、MMR胚系突变、微卫星评分和肿瘤突变负荷(TMB)。对于MLH1蛋白表达缺失的病例,采用甲基化特异性PCR检测MLH1基因启动子的甲基化状态。对于MMR-IHC和MSI-NGS结果不一致的病例,通过PCR(MSI-PCR)再次检测MSI状态,并结合TMB和MLH1基因启动子甲基化结果确定分子分型。(1)本研究中,POLE基因突变亚型22例,错配修复缺陷(MMR-d)亚型55例,p53异常亚型29例,无特定分子特征(NSMP)108例。MMR-d亚型的诊断中位年龄(54岁)和侵袭性组织学类型比例(40.0%,22/55)高于NSMP亚型[分别为50岁和12.0%(13/108);均<0.05]。(2)214例患者中,MMR-IHC检测显示153例错配修复功能正常(MMR-p),49例MMR-d,12例难以直接评估。MSI-NGS显示164例微卫星稳定(MSS;等同于MMR-p),48例高微卫星不稳定性(MSI-H;等同于MMR-d),2例因有效测序深度未达质量控制而无MSI-NGS结果。MMR-IHC与MSI-NGS的总体一致性为94.3%(200/212)。12例不一致病例均为MMR-d或IHC显示MMR蛋白亚克隆缺失,但NGS显示为MSS。其中,10例为MLH1和(或)PMS2蛋白缺失或亚克隆缺失。3例不一致病例被分类为POLE基因突变亚型。其余9例中,5例和3例经MSI-PCR分别确认为MSI-H和低微卫星不稳定性(MSI-L),6例检测到MLH1基因启动子甲基化,7例显示高TMB(>10个突变/Mb)。这9例被分类为MMR-d EC。(3)55例MMR-d EC病例中,27.3%(15/55)诊断为林奇综合征,MSH2和(或)MSH6蛋白缺失或与林奇综合征相关的EC的TMB[分别为(71.0±26.2)和(71.5±20.1)个突变/Mb]显著高于MLH1和(或)PMS2缺失或散发性MMR-d EC[分别为(38.2±19.1)和(41.9±24.3)个突变/Mb,均<0.01]。MMR-d EC中前10位最常突变的基因是PTEN(85.5%,47/55)、ARID1A(80.0%,44/55)、PIK3CA(69.1%,38/55)、KMT2B(60.0%,33/55)、CTCF(45.5%,25/55)、RNF43(40.0%,22/55)、KRAS(36.4%,20/55)、CREBBP(34.5%,19/55)、LRP1B(32.7%,18/55)和BRCA2(32.7%,18/55)。50.9%(28/55)的MMR-d EC患者同时存在PTEN、ARID1A和PIK3CA基因突变。EC中MMR-IHC与MSI-NGS的一致性相对较高。少数MMR-d EC的不一致主要见于MLH1和(或)PMS2蛋白缺失或由MLH1基因启动子高甲基化导致的MMR蛋白亚克隆染色的病例。为了为EC患者提供准确的分子分型,应结合MLH1基因甲基化、MSI-PCR、MMR基因胚系突变和TMB来综合评估MMR和MSI状态。