Urbez-Torres Jose Ramon, Sabaratnam Siva, Acheampong Susanna, Balcaen Diana, Boule Julie, Ghoshal Basudev, Bennypaul Harvinder, Thurston Molly, Richardson Tamara, Molnar Cody, Harper Scott
Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 4200 Highway 97, Box 5000, Summerland, British Columbia, Canada, V0H 1Z0;
Ministry of Agriculture, Plant and Animal Health, Abbotsford Agriculture Centre, 1767 Angus Campbell Road, Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada, V3G 2M3;
Plant Dis. 2023 Oct 17. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-09-23-1875-PDN.
British Columbia (BC) is the lead producer of sweet cherries in Canada with more than 2,000 ha in production and a farm gate value of over CAD$100 million annually. Since 2010, an outbreak of little cherry disease caused by Little cherry virus 1 (LChV1) and Little cherry virus 2 (LChV2), as well as X-disease (XD) caused by 'Candidatus Phytoplasma pruni' has caused significant economic losses in neighboring Washington State (WA), USA. LChV1 and LChV2 have long been known to occur in BC (Theilmann et al. 2002); however, 'Ca. P. pruni' has not yet been reported in BC. Due to its geographical proximity to WA State, the BC cherry industry expressed significant concerns about the possible presence of the phytoplasma in cherry orchards. Accordingly, the main objective of this study was to survey cherry orchards to determine whether 'Ca. P. pruni' was present in symptomatic trees in BC. A total of 118 samples of leaves and fruit stems from individual symptomatic trees were collected prior to harvest from nine cherry orchards and one nectarine orchard in the Okanagan and Similkameen Valleys in BC. Characteristic symptoms included small and misshapen fruit with poor color development. Samples were submitted to AGNEMA, LLC (Pasco, WA) for testing using qPCR TaqMan assays for LChV1 (Katsiani et al. 2018), LChV2 (Shires et al. 2022) and 'Ca. P. pruni' (Kogej et al. 2020). Test results showed 21 samples (17.8%) from three cherry orchards positive for LChV2 and 2 samples (1.7%) from one cherry orchard positive for 'Ca. P. pruni'. In order to confirm the identification of 'Ca. P. pruni', part of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene was amplified by nested PCR using the P1/P7 followed by R16F2n/R2 primer sets (Gundersen and Lee 1996) and Sanger sequenced. BC-XD-Pa-1 (GenBank Acc. No. OR539920) and BC-XD-Pa-2 (OR537699) were identical to one another and showed 99.92% identity to the 'Ca. P. pruni' reference strain CX-95 (JQ044397). Analysis using iPhyClassifier (Zhou et al. 2009) indicated that they were 16SrIII-A strains. Interestingly, the two partial 16S sequences showed 100% nucleotide identity to strain 10324 (MH810016) and others from WA. For additional confirmation, partial secA (Hodgetts et al. 2008) and secY (Lee et al. 2010) translocases were amplified and sequenced. As with the 16S sequences, secY sequences (OR542980, OR542981) showed 99.92% nucleotide identity to strain CX-95 (JQ268249), and 100% to strain 10324 (MH810035). The secA sequences (OR542978, OR542979) had nucleotide identities of 99.77% to strain CX (MW547067), and 100% to the Green Valley strain from California (EU168733). Accordingly, 'Ca. P. Pruni' was confirmed to be present in sweet cherry samples from BC. 'Ca. P. Pruni'-related strains have been previously reported to occur in Canada in commercial poinsettias (Euphorbia pulcherrima) (Arocha-Rosete et al. 2021). To our knowledge, this is the first report of 'Ca. P. Pruni' in sweet cherry in Canada. Due to the important economic value of sweet cherries in BC, these findings are highly significant and represent the first steps towards the development of a surveillance system for early detection of XD, and consequent implementation of management strategies, including vector control. As required by federal and provincial regulations, cherry trees infected with LChV2 and 'Ca. P. Pruni' found in the survey were removed by the growers.
不列颠哥伦比亚省(BC)是加拿大甜樱桃的主要产地,种植面积超过2000公顷,农场门产值每年超过1亿加元。自2010年以来,由1号小樱桃病毒(LChV1)和2号小樱桃病毒(LChV2)引起的小樱桃病疫情,以及由“李属植原体”引起的X病(XD),已在美国华盛顿州(WA)造成重大经济损失。长期以来,人们已知LChV1和LChV2在BC省存在(Theilmann等人,2002年);然而,BC省尚未报告“李属植原体”。由于其与华盛顿州地理位置接近,BC省樱桃产业对樱桃果园中可能存在这种植原体表示了极大担忧。因此,本研究的主要目的是对樱桃果园进行调查,以确定BC省有症状的树木中是否存在“李属植原体”。在收获前,从BC省奥肯那根谷和西米卡门谷的9个樱桃果园和1个油桃园中,共采集了118个来自有症状单株树木的叶片和果梗样本。特征性症状包括果实小且畸形,颜色发育不良。样本被提交给AGNEMA公司(华盛顿州帕斯科),使用针对LChV1(Katsiani等人,2018年)、LChV2(Shires等人,2022年)和“李属植原体”(Kogej等人,2020年)的qPCR TaqMan检测法进行检测。检测结果显示,来自3个樱桃果园的21个样本(17.8%)LChV2呈阳性,来自1个樱桃果园的2个样本(1.7%)“李属植原体”呈阳性。为了确认“李属植原体”的鉴定结果,使用P1/P7引物对,随后用R16F2n/R2引物对通过巢式PCR扩增16S核糖体RNA基因的部分片段,并进行桑格测序。BC-XD-Pa-1(GenBank登录号OR539920)和BC-XD-Pa-2(OR537699)彼此相同,与“李属植原体”参考菌株CX-95(JQ044397)的同一性为99.92%。使用iPhyClassifier(Zhou等人,2009年)进行分析表明,它们是16SrIII-A菌株。有趣的是,这两个部分16S序列与菌株10324(MH810016)以及来自华盛顿州的其他序列核苷酸同一性为100%。为了进一步确认,扩增并测序了部分secA(Hodgetts等人,2008年)和secY(Lee等人,2010年)转位酶。与16S序列一样,secY序列(OR542980、OR542981)与菌株CX-95(JQ268249)的核苷酸同一性为99.92%,与菌株10324(MH810035)的同一性为100%。secA序列(OR542978、OR542979)与菌株CX(MW547067)的核苷酸同一性为99.77%,与来自加利福尼亚州绿谷菌株(EU168733)的同一性为100%。因此,已确认BC省甜樱桃样本中存在“李属植原体”。此前有报道称,与“李属植原体”相关的菌株在加拿大的商业一品红(猩猩木)中出现(Arocha-Rosete等人,2021年)。据我们所知,这是加拿大甜樱桃中首次报道“李属植原体”。由于甜樱桃在BC省具有重要的经济价值,这些发现具有重要意义,代表了朝着建立早期检测XD的监测系统以及随后实施包括媒介控制在内的管理策略迈出的第一步。根据联邦和省级法规要求,种植者移除了在调查中发现的感染LChV2和“李属植原体”的樱桃树。