Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Department of Political and Social Sciences, European University Institute, Florence, Italy.
Int J Public Health. 2023 Oct 2;68:1606069. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1606069. eCollection 2023.
While status anxiety has received attention as a potential mechanism generating health inequalities, empirical evidence is still limited. Studies have been ecological and have largely focused on mental and not physical health outcomes. We conducted individual-level analyses to assess status anxiety (feelings of inferiority resulting from social comparisons) and resources (financial difficulties) as mediators of the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) (education/occupation/employment status) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). We used cross-sectional data of 21,150 participants (aged 18-70 years) from the Amsterdam-based HELIUS study. We estimated associations using logistic regression models and estimated mediated proportions using natural effect modelling. Odds of status anxiety were higher among participants with a low SES [e.g., OR = 2.66 (95% CI: 2.06-3.45) for elementary versus academic occupation]. Odds of T2D were 1.49 (95% CI: 1.12-1.97) times higher among participants experiencing status anxiety. Proportion of the SES-T2D relationship mediated was 3.2% (95% CI: 1.5%-7.0%) through status anxiety and 10.9% (95% CI: 6.6%-18.0%) through financial difficulties. Status anxiety and financial difficulties played small but consistent mediating roles. These individual-level analyses underline status anxiety's importance and imply that status anxiety requires attention in efforts to reduce health inequalities.
虽然地位焦虑已被视为产生健康不平等的潜在机制而受到关注,但实证证据仍然有限。这些研究大多是生态学研究,主要关注心理健康结果,而不是身体健康结果。我们进行了个体水平分析,以评估地位焦虑(由于社会比较而产生的自卑感)和资源(经济困难)作为社会经济地位(SES)(教育/职业/就业状况)与 2 型糖尿病(T2D)之间关系的中介因素。我们使用了来自阿姆斯特丹 HELIUS 研究的 21150 名参与者(年龄在 18-70 岁之间)的横断面数据。我们使用逻辑回归模型估计关联,并使用自然效应建模估计中介比例。SES 较低的参与者(例如,与学术职业相比,基本职业的 OR = 2.66(95%CI:2.06-3.45))的地位焦虑几率更高。经历地位焦虑的参与者患 T2D 的几率高 1.49 倍(95%CI:1.12-1.97)。SES-T2D 关系的中介比例为 3.2%(95%CI:1.5%-7.0%),通过地位焦虑和 10.9%(95%CI:6.6%-18.0%),通过经济困难。地位焦虑和经济困难起着微小但一致的中介作用。这些个体水平分析强调了地位焦虑的重要性,并暗示在努力减少健康不平等时,需要关注地位焦虑。