Department of Neurology, University of Warmia and Mazury, 30 Warszawska Ave, 10-082, Olsztyn, Poland.
Center of Neurology, Lodz, Poland.
J Neurol. 2024 Jan;271(1):105-115. doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-11969-8. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
This review addresses current changes in the approach to treating patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The widely practiced approach of utilizing agents with lower treatment efficacy (LETA) at onset with subsequent escalation has been challenged by new data suggesting that MS patients derive greater benefit when therapy is initiated with high-efficacy treatment agents (HETA). Several recent studies compared treatment efficacy and safety of early administration of HETA versus LETA. The results of randomized, double blind, phase III studies with LETA as a control arm and population-based larger and longer studies using propensity scoring, marginal structural modeling and weighted cumulative exposure analysis support the benefit of early treatment with HETA. Patients initiating their treatment with HETA, regardless of prognostic factors and MRI burden at baseline, showed significantly lower annualized relapse rate (ARR) and reduced disability progression in follow-up periods of up to 10-15 years. Moreover, the safety profile of recently approved HETA ameliorates concerns about off-target effects associated with a number of earlier high-efficacy drugs. Patient perception has also changed with an increasing preference for medication profiles that both improve symptoms and prevent disease progression. Accumulating data from randomized studies and the results of large population-based studies demonstrating short-term and longer-term patient benefits support the view that HETA should be more widely used. The adoption of early treatment with HETA capitalizes on a window of opportunity for anti-inflammatory drugs to maximally impact disease pathology and heralds a sea change in clinical practice toward pro-active management and away from a philosophy routed in generating clinical benefit as a consequence of treatment failure.
这篇综述探讨了多发性硬化症(MS)患者治疗方法的最新变化。目前广泛应用的治疗方法是在疾病发作时使用疗效较低的药物(LETA),随后进行升级治疗,但新数据表明,MS 患者在起始治疗时使用高效治疗药物(HETA)时获益更大,这一方法受到了挑战。最近有几项研究比较了早期使用 HETA 与 LETA 的治疗效果和安全性。LETA 作为对照臂的随机、双盲、III 期研究结果,以及基于人群的更大、更长时间的研究,采用倾向评分、边缘结构模型和加权累积暴露分析,均支持早期使用 HETA 的治疗获益。无论基线时的预后因素和 MRI 负担如何,起始治疗时使用 HETA 的患者的年复发率(ARR)显著降低,在 10-15 年的随访期间残疾进展减少。此外,最近批准的 HETA 的安全性特征减轻了人们对与许多早期高效药物相关的脱靶效应的担忧。患者的认知也发生了变化,他们越来越倾向于选择既能改善症状又能预防疾病进展的药物。随机研究的累积数据和大型基于人群的研究结果表明,短期和长期的患者获益支持广泛使用 HETA 的观点。早期使用 HETA 的治疗方法利用了抗炎药物最大程度影响疾病病理的机会窗口,标志着临床实践朝着积极主动的管理方向发生了重大变化,不再是一种因治疗失败而产生临床获益的理念。