- Hospital Felicio Rocho, Coloproctologia - Belo Horizonte - MG - Brasil.
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2023 Oct 13;50:e20233562. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20233562-en. eCollection 2023.
colonoscopy is the best method for detecting polyps, with a reduction in colorectal cancer mortality of 29% and reaching 47% for distal tumors. However, it fails to demonstrate a significant reduction in proximal colon cancer mortality, and is the most common segment with interval neoplasm. The present study aimed to evaluate the impact on detection of polyps of a second sequential evaluation of cecum and ascending colon, with or without the use of indigo carmine chromoendoscopy.
prospective, non-randomized clinical trial. Patients were divided into two groups. The first (G1) underwent a routine colonoscopy, followed by a second endoscopy assessment of ascending colon and cecum. The second group (G2) underwent a routine colonoscopy, followed by a second assessment of the ascending colon and cecum with indigo carmine chromoendoscopy.
In total, 203 patients were analyzed, 101 in the G1 and 102 in the G2. Newer polyps were identified in both groups after the second assessment with a significantly higher number of polyps detected in the patients in the G2 (p=0.0001). The number of patients who had at least one polyp in the two endoscopic assessments was significantly higher in the G2 (53 or 52% vs 27 or 26.7%, p=0.0002). In the second endoscopic assessment, the number of polyps found was also significantly higher in the G2 (50 or 76.9%) compared to the G1 (15 or 23.1%), p<0.0001.
the second assessment with dye-based chromoendoscopy increases the detection of polyps in the ascending colon and cecum.
结肠镜检查是检测息肉的最佳方法,可将结直肠癌死亡率降低 29%,达到 47%,适用于远端肿瘤。然而,它未能显著降低近端结肠癌的死亡率,而且近端结肠癌是最常见的有间隔肿瘤的部位。本研究旨在评估对升结肠和盲肠的第二次连续评估(有无靛胭脂染色 chromoendoscopy)对息肉检测的影响。
前瞻性、非随机临床试验。患者分为两组。第一组(G1)行常规结肠镜检查,然后行升结肠和盲肠第二次内镜评估。第二组(G2)行常规结肠镜检查,然后行升结肠和盲肠第二次评估,使用靛胭脂 chromoendoscopy。
共分析了 203 例患者,G1 组 101 例,G2 组 102 例。两组患者在第二次评估中均发现了新的息肉,G2 组检测到的息肉数量明显更多(p=0.0001)。在两次内镜检查中至少有一个息肉的患者,G2 组明显多于 G1 组(53 例或 52%比 27 例或 26.7%,p=0.0002)。在第二次内镜评估中,G2 组发现的息肉数量也明显多于 G1 组(G2 组 50 例或 76.9%比 G1 组 15 例或 23.1%,p<0.0001)。
基于染料的 chromoendoscopy 进行第二次评估可增加升结肠和盲肠的息肉检出率。