• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于染色的 chromoendoscopy 检测盲肠和升结肠息肉 - 常规使用是否合理?

Polyp detection in the cecum and ascending colon by dye based chromoendoscopy - Is its routine use justified?

机构信息

- Hospital Felicio Rocho, Coloproctologia - Belo Horizonte - MG - Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Col Bras Cir. 2023 Oct 13;50:e20233562. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20233562-en. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1590/0100-6991e-20233562-en
PMID:37851759
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10519701/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

colonoscopy is the best method for detecting polyps, with a reduction in colorectal cancer mortality of 29% and reaching 47% for distal tumors. However, it fails to demonstrate a significant reduction in proximal colon cancer mortality, and is the most common segment with interval neoplasm. The present study aimed to evaluate the impact on detection of polyps of a second sequential evaluation of cecum and ascending colon, with or without the use of indigo carmine chromoendoscopy.

METHODS

prospective, non-randomized clinical trial. Patients were divided into two groups. The first (G1) underwent a routine colonoscopy, followed by a second endoscopy assessment of ascending colon and cecum. The second group (G2) underwent a routine colonoscopy, followed by a second assessment of the ascending colon and cecum with indigo carmine chromoendoscopy.

RESULTS

In total, 203 patients were analyzed, 101 in the G1 and 102 in the G2. Newer polyps were identified in both groups after the second assessment with a significantly higher number of polyps detected in the patients in the G2 (p=0.0001). The number of patients who had at least one polyp in the two endoscopic assessments was significantly higher in the G2 (53 or 52% vs 27 or 26.7%, p=0.0002). In the second endoscopic assessment, the number of polyps found was also significantly higher in the G2 (50 or 76.9%) compared to the G1 (15 or 23.1%), p<0.0001.

CONCLUSIONS

the second assessment with dye-based chromoendoscopy increases the detection of polyps in the ascending colon and cecum.

摘要

简介

结肠镜检查是检测息肉的最佳方法,可将结直肠癌死亡率降低 29%,达到 47%,适用于远端肿瘤。然而,它未能显著降低近端结肠癌的死亡率,而且近端结肠癌是最常见的有间隔肿瘤的部位。本研究旨在评估对升结肠和盲肠的第二次连续评估(有无靛胭脂染色 chromoendoscopy)对息肉检测的影响。

方法

前瞻性、非随机临床试验。患者分为两组。第一组(G1)行常规结肠镜检查,然后行升结肠和盲肠第二次内镜评估。第二组(G2)行常规结肠镜检查,然后行升结肠和盲肠第二次评估,使用靛胭脂 chromoendoscopy。

结果

共分析了 203 例患者,G1 组 101 例,G2 组 102 例。两组患者在第二次评估中均发现了新的息肉,G2 组检测到的息肉数量明显更多(p=0.0001)。在两次内镜检查中至少有一个息肉的患者,G2 组明显多于 G1 组(53 例或 52%比 27 例或 26.7%,p=0.0002)。在第二次内镜评估中,G2 组发现的息肉数量也明显多于 G1 组(G2 组 50 例或 76.9%比 G1 组 15 例或 23.1%,p<0.0001)。

结论

基于染料的 chromoendoscopy 进行第二次评估可增加升结肠和盲肠的息肉检出率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f55/10519701/63270185d4a3/rcbc-50-e20233562-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f55/10519701/13c01db8febc/rcbc-50-e20233562-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f55/10519701/63270185d4a3/rcbc-50-e20233562-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f55/10519701/13c01db8febc/rcbc-50-e20233562-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f55/10519701/63270185d4a3/rcbc-50-e20233562-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Polyp detection in the cecum and ascending colon by dye based chromoendoscopy - Is its routine use justified?基于染色的 chromoendoscopy 检测盲肠和升结肠息肉 - 常规使用是否合理?
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2023 Oct 13;50:e20233562. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20233562-en. eCollection 2023.
2
Efficacy of chromoendoscopy with indigocarmine for the detection of ascending colon and cecum lesions.靛胭脂染色内镜检查对升结肠和盲肠病变的检测效果。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43(7):878-85. doi: 10.1080/00365520801935442.
3
High-resolution chromoendoscopy for classifying colonic polyps: a multicenter study.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 May;55(6):687-94. doi: 10.1067/mge.2002.123619.
4
Insertion water exchange increases right colon adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection rates during withdrawal.插入式水交换可提高退镜过程中右半结肠腺瘤和增生性息肉的检出率。
Dig Liver Dis. 2016 Jun;48(6):638-43. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2016.03.004. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
5
An Additional 30-s Observation of the Right-Sided Colon with Narrow Band Imaging Decreases Missed Polyps: A Pilot Study.窄带成像技术对右侧结肠额外观察 30 秒可减少遗漏息肉:一项初步研究。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Dec;63(12):3457-3464. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5275-1. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
6
Missed adenomas during colonoscopic surveillance in individuals with Lynch Syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer).林奇综合征(遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌)患者结肠镜监测期间漏诊的腺瘤
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2008 Nov;1(6):470-5. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0098.
7
Panchromoendoscopy Increases Detection of Polyps in Patients With Serrated Polyposis Syndrome.染色内镜检查提高锯齿状息肉综合征患者息肉检出率。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Sep;17(10):2016-2023.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.10.029. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
8
Novel endocuff-assisted colonoscopy significantly increases the polyp detection rate: a randomized controlled trial.新型内套辅助结肠镜检查显著提高息肉检出率:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 May-Jun;49(5):413-8. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000166.
9
Relationship between the endoscopic withdrawal time and adenoma/polyp detection rate in individual colonic segments: a KASID multicenter study.结直肠各部位内镜退镜时间与腺瘤/息肉检出率的关系:一项 KASID 多中心研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Mar;89(3):523-530. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.09.016. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
10
Position change during colonoscope withdrawal increases polyp and adenoma detection in the right but not in the left side of the colon: results of a randomized controlled trial.结肠镜退镜过程中改变体位可增加结肠右侧而非左侧息肉和腺瘤的检出率:一项随机对照试验的结果
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Sep;82(3):488-94. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.035. Epub 2015 Apr 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Incidence and Mortality of Proximal and Distal Colorectal Cancer in Germany—Trends in the Era of Screening Colonoscopy.德国近端和远端结直肠癌的发病率和死亡率——筛查结肠镜时代的趋势。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Apr 23;118(16):281-287. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0111.
2
Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview.2020年癌症统计数据概述。
Int J Cancer. 2021 Apr 5. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33588.
3
ACG Clinical Guidelines: Colorectal Cancer Screening 2021.ACG 临床指南:结直肠癌筛查 2021 年版。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Mar 1;116(3):458-479. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001122.
4
Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality After a Single Negative Screening Colonoscopy.单次阴性筛查结肠镜检查后的长期结直肠癌发病率和死亡率。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jul 21;173(2):81-91. doi: 10.7326/M19-2477. Epub 2020 May 26.
5
Terminology, Molecular Features, Epidemiology, and Management of Serrated Colorectal Neoplasia.锯齿状结直肠肿瘤的术语、分子特征、流行病学和处理。
Gastroenterology. 2019 Oct;157(4):949-966.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.06.041. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
6
Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society.美国癌症协会 2018 年普通风险成年人结直肠癌筛查指南更新
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jul;68(4):250-281. doi: 10.3322/caac.21457. Epub 2018 May 30.
7
Colorectal Carcinoma: A General Overview and Future Perspectives in Colorectal Cancer.结直肠癌:结直肠癌的概述与未来展望
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Jan 19;18(1):197. doi: 10.3390/ijms18010197.
8
Chromoscopy versus conventional endoscopy for the detection of polyps in the colon and rectum.染色内镜检查与传统内镜检查在结肠和直肠息肉检测中的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 7;4(4):CD006439. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006439.pub4.
9
Endoscopic features of sessile serrated adenomas: validation by international experts using high-resolution white-light endoscopy and narrow-band imaging.内镜下无蒂锯齿状腺瘤的特征:采用高分辨率白光内镜和窄带成像技术的国际专家验证。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jun;77(6):916-24. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.12.018. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
10
Pancolonic chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine versus standard colonoscopy for detection of neoplastic lesions: a randomised two-centre trial.全结肠染色内镜检查与靛胭脂染色标准结肠镜检查对肿瘤性病变的检出率比较:一项随机双中心试验。
Gut. 2011 Apr;60(4):485-90. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.229534. Epub 2010 Dec 15.