King George's Medical University, Lucknow.
ASMC, Pratapgarh, UP, India.
J Glaucoma. 2024 Mar 1;33(3):189-194. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002314. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
Reading results in a rise in intraocular pressure (IOP) which is greater while using smartphones compared with printed text among healthy and individuals with medically controlled primary open angle glaucoma (POAG).
To compare the effect of reading for 30 minutes using smartphone and printed text on IOP.
Sixty healthy volunteers and 22 patients with medically controlled POAG were asked to perform reading tasks using printed text followed by digital (smartphone) text under standardized conditions. IOP assessment was done using a rebound tonometer at baseline and subsequently at 10, 20, and 30 minutes of reading and 10 and 20 minutes post completion of reading tasks. IOP variations from baseline were measured and compared. Paired and independent ' T ' test analysis was performed to study IOP variations, and a P -value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
The mean baseline IOP among volunteers and patients withPOAG was 14.58 (±2.91) and 15.02 (±2.18) mmHg, respectively. There was a rise in IOP in all participants with reading using either of the modalities, which normalized after 20 minutes of cessation. There was a statistically significant difference in rise in IOP from baseline between the 2 modalities (printed text reading and smartphone reading) at 20 minutes {+0.78 & +2.01 ( P =0.002)} and 30 minutes {+0.64 & +1.72 ( P =0.004)} among healthy volunteers and at 20 minutes {+0.78 & +2.01 ( P =0.002)} among POAG patients.
Reading is associated with the rise in IOP in both healthy volunteers and POAG individuals. The IOP rise is more marked with smartphone compared with printed text reading.
阅读会导致眼内压(IOP)升高,在健康人群和接受药物治疗的原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)患者中,使用智能手机阅读时的 IOP 升高幅度大于阅读印刷文本时。
比较使用智能手机和印刷文本阅读 30 分钟对 IOP 的影响。
要求 60 名健康志愿者和 22 名接受药物治疗的 POAG 患者在标准化条件下分别使用印刷文本和数字(智能手机)文本进行阅读任务。使用回弹眼压计在基线以及阅读后 10、20 和 30 分钟以及阅读任务完成后 10 和 20 分钟测量并比较 IOP 变化。使用配对和独立“T”检验分析来研究 IOP 变化,P 值<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。
志愿者和 POAG 患者的平均基线 IOP 分别为 14.58(±2.91)和 15.02(±2.18)mmHg。所有参与者在使用任一种方式阅读时 IOP 均升高,停止阅读 20 分钟后恢复正常。两种方式(阅读印刷文本和智能手机阅读)在 20 分钟时{+0.78 & +2.01(P=0.002)}和 30 分钟时{+0.64 & +1.72(P=0.004)},志愿者的 IOP 从基线升高存在统计学差异,在 20 分钟时{+0.78 & +2.01(P=0.002)},POAG 患者的 IOP 从基线升高存在统计学差异。
阅读会导致健康志愿者和 POAG 患者的 IOP 升高。与阅读印刷文本相比,使用智能手机阅读时 IOP 升高更明显。