• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

合作的力量:探索美国移植研究中的合作动态

The power of partnership: Exploring collaboration dynamics in U.S. transplant research.

作者信息

Faria Isabella, Montalvan Adriana, Canizares Stalin, Martins Paulo N, Weber Griffin M, Kazimi Marwan, Eckhoff Devin

机构信息

Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2024 Jan;227:24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.008. Epub 2023 Oct 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.008
PMID:37852844
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Collaboration is one of the hallmarks of academic research. This study analyzes collaboration patterns in U.S. transplant research, examining publication trends, productive institutions, co-authorship networks, and citation patterns in high-impact transplant journals.

METHODS

4,265 articles published between 2012 and 2021 were analyzed using scientometric tools, logistic regression, VantagePoint software, and Gephi software for network visualization.

RESULTS

16,003 authors from 1,011 institutions and 59 countries were identified, with Harvard, Johns Hopkins, and University of Pennsylvania contributing the most papers. Odds of international collaboration significantly increased over time (OR 1.03; p ​= ​0.040), while odds of citation in single-institution collaborations decreased (OR 0.99; p ​= ​0.016). Five major scientific communities and central institutions (Harvard University and University of Pittsburgh) connecting them were identified, revealing interconnected research clusters.

CONCLUSIONS

Collaboration enhances knowledge exchange and research productivity, with an increasing trend of institutional and international collaboration in U.S. transplant research. Understanding this community is essential for promoting research impact and forming strategic partnerships.

摘要

引言

合作是学术研究的标志之一。本研究分析了美国移植研究中的合作模式,考察了高影响力移植期刊上的发表趋势、高产机构、共同作者网络和引用模式。

方法

使用科学计量工具、逻辑回归、VantagePoint软件和用于网络可视化的Gephi软件,对2012年至2021年间发表的4265篇文章进行了分析。

结果

确定了来自1011个机构和59个国家的16003名作者,其中哈佛大学、约翰·霍普金斯大学和宾夕法尼亚大学贡献的论文最多。国际合作的几率随时间显著增加(OR 1.03;p = 0.040),而单机构合作中的被引用几率则下降(OR 0.99;p = 0.016)。确定了五个主要科学社区以及连接它们的核心机构(哈佛大学和匹兹堡大学),揭示了相互关联的研究集群。

结论

合作促进了知识交流和研究生产力,在美国移植研究中,机构和国际合作呈增加趋势。了解这个群体对于提高研究影响力和形成战略伙伴关系至关重要。

相似文献

1
The power of partnership: Exploring collaboration dynamics in U.S. transplant research.合作的力量:探索美国移植研究中的合作动态
Am J Surg. 2024 Jan;227:24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.008. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
2
Research collaboration on community health worker programmes in low-income countries: an analysis of authorship teams and networks.低收入国家社区卫生工作者项目的研究合作:对作者团队和网络的分析。
Glob Health Action. 2019;12(1):1606570. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2019.1606570.
3
The scientific productions in Iranian biomedical ethics: A combined study of bibliometrics and social network analysis.伊朗生物医学伦理学领域的科研成果:文献计量学与社会网络分析的综合研究
Dev World Bioeth. 2022 Sep;22(3):126-139. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12306. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
4
[Coauthorship networks and institutional collaboration in Revista de Neurología].[《神经学杂志》中的共同作者网络与机构合作]
Rev Neurol. 2008;46(11):642-51.
5
Evolution of Cooperation Patterns in Psoriasis Research: Co-Authorship Network Analysis of Papers in Medline (1942-2013).银屑病研究中合作模式的演变:Medline数据库(1942 - 2013年)论文的共同作者网络分析
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 11;10(12):e0144837. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144837. eCollection 2015.
6
Coauthorship networks and institutional collaboration patterns in reproductive biology.生殖生物学领域的共同作者网络与机构合作模式。
Fertil Steril. 2008 Oct;90(4):941-56. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.07.1378. Epub 2008 Jan 4.
7
[Co-authorship and collaboration networks in Spanish research into multiple sclerosis (1996-2010)].[西班牙多发性硬化症研究中的共同作者关系与合作网络(1996 - 2010年)]
Rev Neurol. 2013 Aug 16;57(4):157-66.
8
A cross-sectional analysis identified co-authorship networks and scientific collaboration on reporting guidelines for health research.一项横断面分析确定了健康研究报告规范的合著网络和科学合作。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 May;157:22-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.02.001. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
9
Visualization of knowledge flow in interpersonal scientific collaboration network endocrinology and metabolism research institute.人际科学合作网络内分泌与代谢研究所中的知识流动可视化。
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2020 Oct 1;20(1):815-823. doi: 10.1007/s40200-020-00644-8. eCollection 2021 Jun.
10
Evolution of primary care databases in UK: a scientometric analysis of research output.英国初级保健数据库的发展:研究产出的科学计量分析
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 11;6(10):e012785. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012785.

引用本文的文献

1
Successful Collaboration: A Tale of a Tertiary Care Hospital and Its Designated Organ Procurement Organization.成功的合作:一家三级医疗医院与其指定器官采购组织的故事
Cureus. 2024 Nov 7;16(11):e73215. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73215. eCollection 2024 Nov.