Suppr超能文献

增强型康复方案对印度北阿坎德邦癌症研究所食管癌切除术短期结局的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。

Impact of Enhanced Recovery Protocols on Short-Term Outcomes in Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study from Cancer Research Institute, Uttarakhand, India.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Swami Ram Nagar, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, 248140, India.

Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Research Institute, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Swami Ram Nagar, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, 248140, India.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2023 Dec;47(12):2968-2976. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-07204-0. Epub 2023 Oct 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Surgery for esophageal cancer is associated with high mortality and morbidity, especially in low and middle-income countries. The recent enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines for esophagectomy (2018) which attempt to reduce complications and length of stay (LOS) have rarely been validated in these settings. This study aimed to analyse the effect of this protocol on short-term outcomes in our subset of patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted to investigate the outcomes of enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) compared to standard pre-protocol care (PP) in patients who underwent esophagectomy for cancer (31 in ERP vs 61 in PP group) at Cancer Research Institute, Uttarakhand, India. The main outcomes measured were 30-day mortality, morbidity and LOS. Risk assessment was stratified as per Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) systems while complications were classified as per the Clavien-Dindo scale.

RESULTS

Preoperative clinical characteristics were similar between groups. Though the predicted POSSUM mortality and morbidity were significantly higher in the ERP group (p = 0.007), 30-day morbidity (19.35% vs 42.62%, p = 0.027) as well as median LOS (12 vs 15 days, p < 0.001) was significantly lower in ERP group. The PP group reported 4 deaths within 30 days as compared to none in the ERP group (p = 0.296). Furthermore, the ERP group reported lower occurrence of pulmonary complications (6.4%vs24.6%,p = 0.046), hemodynamic instability (0%vs14.75%,p = 0.026) as well as need for prolonged postoperative ventilation (> 24 h; 0% vs 11.48%, p = 0.004). Both minor and major complications as assessed by the Clavien-Dindo scale were lower in the group ERP though these differences were not statistically significant (0.059).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of ERP improved short-term outcomes; hence can be strongly recommended in patients undergoing esophagectomy.

摘要

目的

食管癌手术的死亡率和发病率都很高,尤其是在中低收入国家。最近的《食管癌手术后加速康复指南(2018 年)》试图减少并发症和住院时间(LOS),但在这些环境中很少得到验证。本研究旨在分析该方案对我们患者亚组短期结果的影响。

方法

对印度北阿坎德邦癌症研究所接受食管癌切除术的患者进行了回顾性研究,比较了增强恢复方案(ERP)与标准术前方案(PP)的结果(ERP 组 31 例,PP 组 61 例)。主要观察指标为 30 天死亡率、发病率和 LOS。风险评估按生理和手术严重程度评分(POSSUM)系统分层,并发症按 Clavien-Dindo 分级。

结果

两组术前临床特征相似。尽管 ERP 组的预测 POSSUM 死亡率和发病率明显更高(p=0.007),但 ERP 组的 30 天发病率(19.35%比 42.62%,p=0.027)和中位 LOS(12 天比 15 天,p<0.001)明显较低。PP 组报告 30 天内死亡 4 例,而 ERP 组无死亡(p=0.296)。此外,ERP 组报告的肺部并发症发生率较低(6.4%比 24.6%,p=0.046),血流动力学不稳定发生率较低(0%比 14.75%,p=0.026),以及需要延长术后通气时间(>24 小时;0%比 11.48%,p=0.004)。Clavien-Dindo 分级评估的轻微和严重并发症在 ERP 组较低,但这些差异无统计学意义(0.059)。

结论

实施 ERP 可改善短期结果;因此,在接受食管癌手术的患者中强烈推荐使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验