• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国工作年龄成年人中按种族/族裔和社会经济地位划分的独居与癌症死亡率

Living alone and cancer mortality by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status among US working-age adults.

作者信息

Lee Hyunjung, Singh Gopal K, Jemal Ahmedin, Islami Farhad

机构信息

Surveillance and Health Equity Science Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Office of Health Equity, Health Resources and Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2024 Jan 1;130(1):86-95. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35042. Epub 2023 Oct 19.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.35042
PMID:37855867
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown an association between living alone and cancer mortality; however, findings by sex and race/ethnicity have generally been inconsistent, and data by socioeconomic status are sparse. The association between living alone and cancer mortality by sex, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status in a nationally representative US cohort was examined.

METHODS

Pooled 1998-2019 data for adults aged 18-64 years at enrollment from the National Health Interview Survey linked to the National Death Index (N = 473,648) with up to 22 years of follow-up were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for the association between living alone and cancer mortality.

RESULTS

Compared to adults living with others, adults living alone were at a higher risk of cancer death in the age-adjusted model (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.25-1.39) and after additional adjustments for multiple sociodemographic characteristics and cancer risk factors (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04-1.16). Age-adjusted models stratified by sex, poverty level, and educational attainment showed similar associations between living alone and cancer mortality, but the association was stronger among non-Hispanic White adults (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.25-1.42) than non-Hispanic Black adults (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.05-1.32; p value for difference < .05) and did not exist in other racial/ethnic groups. These associations were attenuated but persisted in fully adjusted models among men (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.05-1.23), women (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.18), non-Hispanic White adults (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.05-1.20), and adults with a college degree (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.07-1.39).

CONCLUSIONS

In this nationally representative study in the United States, adults living alone were at a higher risk of cancer death in several sociodemographic groups.

摘要

背景

既往研究表明独居与癌症死亡率之间存在关联;然而,按性别和种族/族裔划分的研究结果通常并不一致,且社会经济地位方面的数据较为匮乏。本研究考察了在美国具有全国代表性的队列中,独居与按性别、种族/族裔和社会经济地位划分的癌症死亡率之间的关联。

方法

利用1998 - 2019年全国健康访谈调查中入组时年龄在18 - 64岁的成年人的数据,并与国家死亡指数相链接(N = 473,648),随访时间长达22年,计算独居与癌症死亡率之间关联的风险比(HR)。

结果

与与他人同住的成年人相比,在年龄调整模型中,独居成年人的癌症死亡风险更高(HR,1.32;95%CI,1.25 - 1.39),在对多种社会人口学特征和癌症风险因素进行进一步调整后(HR,1.10;95%CI,1.04 - 1.16)依然如此。按性别、贫困水平和教育程度分层的年龄调整模型显示,独居与癌症死亡率之间存在相似的关联,但在非西班牙裔白人成年人中这种关联更强(HR,1.33;95%CI,1.25 - 1.42),高于非西班牙裔黑人成年人(HR,1.18;95%CI,1.05 - 1.32;差异p值 <.05),在其他种族/族裔群体中不存在这种关联。在对男性(HR,1.13;95%CI,1.05 - 1.23)、女性(HR,1.09;95%CI,1.01 - 1.18)、非西班牙裔白人成年人(HR,1.13;95%CI,1.05 - 1.20)和拥有大学学位的成年人(HR,1.22;95%CI,1.07 - 1.39)的完全调整模型中,这些关联有所减弱但仍然存在。

结论

在这项美国具有全国代表性的研究中,独居成年人在几个社会人口学群体中癌症死亡风险更高。

相似文献

1
Living alone and cancer mortality by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status among US working-age adults.美国工作年龄成年人中按种族/族裔和社会经济地位划分的独居与癌症死亡率
Cancer. 2024 Jan 1;130(1):86-95. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35042. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
2
Race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and ALS mortality in the United States.美国的种族/族裔、社会经济地位与肌萎缩侧索硬化症死亡率
Neurology. 2016 Nov 29;87(22):2300-2308. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003298. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
3
Racial disparities in adult all-cause and cause-specific mortality among us adults: mediating and moderating factors.美国成年人全因死亡率和特定病因死亡率的种族差异:中介和调节因素
BMC Public Health. 2016 Oct 22;16(1):1113. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3744-z.
4
Social determinants of health and premature death among adults in the USA from 1999 to 2018: a national cohort study.1999 年至 2018 年美国成年人健康和早逝的社会决定因素:一项全国队列研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2023 Jun;8(6):e422-e431. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00081-6.
5
Survival disparities in non-small cell lung cancer by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.非小细胞肺癌在种族、族裔和社会经济地位方面的生存差异。
Cancer J. 2014 Jul-Aug;20(4):237-45. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000058.
6
The Association Between Psychological Distress and Cancer Mortality in the United States: Results from the 1997-2014 NHIS-NDI Record Linkage Study.美国心理困扰与癌症死亡率之间的关联:来自 1997-2014 年 NHIS-NDI 记录链接研究的结果。
Ann Behav Med. 2021 Jun 28;55(7):621-640. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaa111.
7
Social Isolation and All-Cause and Heart Disease Mortality Among Working-Age Adults in the United States: The 1998-2014 NHIS-NDI Record Linkage Study.美国劳动年龄成年人的社会隔离与全因死亡率和心脏病死亡率:1998 - 2014年国家健康访谈调查-国家死亡索引记录链接研究
Health Equity. 2021 Oct 25;5(1):750-761. doi: 10.1089/heq.2021.0003. eCollection 2021.
8
Relationships between social isolation, neighborhood poverty, and cancer mortality in a population-based study of US adults.一项基于美国成年人的人群研究中社会隔离、邻里贫困与癌症死亡率之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 8;12(3):e0173370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173370. eCollection 2017.
9
Mortality and Morbidity Effects of Long-Term Exposure to Low-Level PM, BC, NO, and O: An Analysis of European Cohorts in the ELAPSE Project.长期暴露于低水平 PM、BC、NO 和 O 对死亡率和发病率的影响:ELAPSE 项目中欧洲队列的分析。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2021 Sep;2021(208):1-127.
10
Association between social determinants of health and survival among the US cancer survivors population.社会决定因素与美国癌症幸存者人群生存状况的关联。
BMC Med. 2024 Aug 26;22(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03563-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Independent associations of social determinants of health with mortality and added predictive value beyond life's essential 8.健康的社会决定因素与死亡率的独立关联以及超越生命基本八大要素的额外预测价值。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2025 Aug 11;44(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s41043-025-01038-3.
2
Assessing Social Determinants of Health in Transplantation and CAR-T Recipients: Expert Panel Recommendations from the Survivorship Special Interest Group of ASTCT.评估移植和CAR-T治疗受者的健康社会决定因素:美国血液与骨髓移植学会生存特别兴趣小组的专家小组建议
Transplant Cell Ther. 2025 Jul 23. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2025.07.017.
3
Function, cognition, and quality of life among older adults with lung cancer who live alone: A prospective cohort study.
独居老年肺癌患者的功能、认知和生活质量:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2024 Nov;15(8):102068. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.102068. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
4
COVID-19 and Alzheimer's disease: Impact of lockdown and other restrictive measures during the COVID-19 pandemic.新型冠状病毒肺炎与阿尔茨海默病:新型冠状病毒肺炎大流行期间封锁及其他限制措施的影响
Biomol Biomed. 2024 Mar 11;24(2):219-229. doi: 10.17305/bb.2023.9680.