Suppr超能文献

两阶段伽玛刀放射外科治疗“大型”脑转移瘤。

Two fractions staged Gammaknife radiosurgery for "large" cerebral metastases.

作者信息

Borius Pierre-Yves, Amelot Aymeric, Boustany Eli, Boskos Christos, Mazeron Jean-Jacques, Valéry Charles Ambroise

机构信息

Neurosurgery Department and GammaKnife Unit, Pitié Salpêtrière Sorbonne University Hospital, Paris, France.

Cyberknife Center, Iatropolis, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023 Nov;49(11):107043. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107043. Epub 2023 Aug 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gammaknife radiosurgery (GKRS) is a valuable option to control cerebral metastases. However, the risk (adverse radiation effect (ARE))-benefit (local control (LC)) ratio switches when the target is too large.

OBJECTIVE

In order to balance this ratio, two fractions staged GKRS protocol was conducted for "large" cerebral metastases. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome (LC, ARE).

METHODS

A total of 39 large cerebral metastases in 35 patients were treated. The initial mean tumor volume was 14.6 cc [6.1; 35.8]. The prescription margin dose was 12 Gy on the 50% isodose line, with 2 weeks between them. A majority of primary cancer were from lung (43%), melanoma (20%) or breast (17%) origin. The mean age was 63 years old (31-89). Mean Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) was 2.

RESULTS

At the second fraction, mean tumor volume was 10.3 cc [1.9-27.4]. The mean percentage of volume variation for decreasing lesions was 29%. At last follow-up, mean tumor volume was 7.4 cc [0-25.2]; 34 lesions decreased volume (mean 35%). A decreased volume of more than 45% after first stage GKRS was able to predict a long-term local response to staged GKRS treatment. Local control rate at 6 months and 1 year was 87.3% and 75% respectively. The rate of ARE was 7.7%. No predictive factor of local control or ARE was found in a univariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

The new 2-fractions-dose-staged GKRS concept seems to be a well-tolerated and effective treatment option for large cerebral metastases.

摘要

背景

伽玛刀放射外科治疗(GKRS)是控制脑转移瘤的一种有效选择。然而,当靶区过大时,风险(不良放射效应(ARE))-获益(局部控制(LC))比会发生变化。

目的

为了平衡这一比例,对“大型”脑转移瘤采用了两阶段分次GKRS方案。本研究的目的是评估其结果(LC,ARE)。

方法

共治疗了35例患者的39个大型脑转移瘤。初始平均肿瘤体积为14.6立方厘米[6.1;35.8]。处方边缘剂量在50%等剂量线上为12 Gy,两次治疗间隔2周。大多数原发癌来自肺(43%)、黑色素瘤(20%)或乳腺(17%)。平均年龄为63岁(31 - 89岁)。平均分级预后评估(GPA)为2。

结果

在第二次分次治疗时,平均肿瘤体积为10.3立方厘米[1.9 - 27.4]。体积缩小的病灶的平均体积变化百分比为29%。在最后一次随访时,平均肿瘤体积为7.4立方厘米[0 - 25.2];34个病灶体积缩小(平均35%)。第一阶段GKRS后体积缩小超过45%能够预测对分期GKRS治疗的长期局部反应。6个月和1年时的局部控制率分别为87.3%和75%。ARE发生率为7.7%。单因素分析未发现局部控制或ARE的预测因素。

结论

新的两阶段剂量分次GKRS概念似乎是一种耐受性良好且有效的大型脑转移瘤治疗选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验