INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE

The continuously expanding research and development of wearable devices for automated seizure detection in epilepsy uses mostly non-invasive technology. Real-time alarms, triggered by seizure detection devices, are needed for safety and prevention to decrease seizure-related morbidity and mortality, as well as objective quantification of seizure frequency and severity. Our review strives to provide a state-of-the-art on automated seizure detection using non-invasive wearable devices in an ambulatory (home) environment and to highlight the prospects for future research.

METHODS

A joint working group of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) and the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN) recently published a clinical practice guideline on automated seizure detection using wearable devices. We updated the systematic literature search for the period since the last search by the joint working group. We selected studies qualifying minimally as phase-2 clinical validation trials, in accordance with standards for testing and validation of seizure detection devices.

RESULTS

High-level evidence (phases 3 and 4) is available only for the detection of tonic-clonic seizures and major motor seizures when using wearable devices based on accelerometry, surface electromyography (EMG), or a multimodal device combining accelerometry and heart rate. The reported sensitivity of these devices is 79.4-96%, with a false alarm rate of 0.20-1.92 per 24 hours (0-0.03 per night). A single phase-3 study validated the detection of absence seizures using a single-channel wearable EEG device. Two phase-4 studies showed overall user satisfaction with wearable seizure detection devices, which helped decrease injuries related to tonic-clonic seizures. Overall satisfaction, perceived sensitivity, and improvement in quality-of-life were significantly higher for validated devices.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the vast number of studies published on seizure detection devices, most are strongly affected by potential bias, providing a too-optimistic perspective. By applying the standards for clinical validation studies, potential bias can be reduced, and the quality of a continuously growing number of studies in this field can be assessed and compared. The ILAE-IFCN clinical practice guideline on automated seizure detection using wearable devices recommends using clinically validated wearable devices for automated detection of tonic-clonic seizures when significant safety concerns exist. The studies published after the guideline was issued only provide incremental knowledge and would not change the current recommendations.