• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定医疗保健转型计划中的价值:一种效益实现方法的评估。

Identifying value in healthcare transformation initiatives: an evaluation of an approach to benefits realisation.

机构信息

KHP Cardiovascular & Respiratory Partnership, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

KHP Cardiovascular & Respiratory Partnership, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Oct;12(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002349.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002349
PMID:37857520
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10603506/
Abstract

Benefits realisation management (BRM) aims to facilitate the process of identifying, measuring and tracking desired benefits derived from a project. Improvement methodology frameworks often describe BRM as integral to identifying and measuring value derived from transformation initiatives within the National Health Service and beyond. Despite this, reporting of benefits realisation plans and methodological approaches to identifying and measuring benefits remains surprisingly scarce.This project aimed to pilot and evaluate the application of a purpose-designed benefits mapping template with seven newly funded transformation projects across three hospitals in the UK. The scope of the template was to identify key project benefits and metrics associated with the project initiatives. Plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles were used to capture the approach and utilisation of the template by project teams. These methods also enabled critical review of the template as an enabler to identifying relevant benefits and project metrics.Stakeholder engagement with the templates was variable. This was attributed to clinical pressures induced by the second wave of COVID-19 in the UK. Despite this, teams were able to produce completed templates outlining a number of wide-ranging benefits. Themes of benefits drawn from the maps include patient experience, patient outcomes, staff experience, access to care and efficiency. Qualitative feedback from teams included the reported value of a structured template to help recognise all the potential benefits associated with each project initiative. The PDSA cycles highlighted the template as an early step in BRM. Further components to this process are recommended to include consensus of the key metrics to be measured, a tool that summarises the reporting details of those metrics, and an effective means to collate reported metrics overtime.

摘要

效益实现管理(BRM)旨在促进识别、衡量和跟踪项目所带来的预期效益的过程。改进方法论框架通常将 BRM 描述为识别和衡量国民保健制度内外转型举措所带来价值的组成部分。尽管如此,关于效益实现计划的报告以及识别和衡量效益的方法在很大程度上仍然很少见。本项目旨在为英国三家医院的七个新资助的转型项目试点和评估一个专门设计的效益映射模板的应用。模板的范围是确定与项目举措相关的关键项目效益和衡量标准。计划-执行-研究-行动(PDSA)循环用于捕获项目团队对模板的应用和利用。这些方法还使模板能够进行关键审查,以确定相关效益和项目衡量标准。模板的利益相关者参与程度各不相同。这归因于英国第二波 COVID-19 带来的临床压力。尽管如此,各团队仍能够完成模板,列出了一系列广泛的效益。从地图中得出的效益主题包括患者体验、患者结果、员工体验、获得护理和效率。团队提供的定性反馈包括报告指出,结构化模板有助于识别与每个项目举措相关的所有潜在效益。PDSA 循环突出了模板作为 BRM 的早期步骤。建议在此过程的进一步组成部分中包括要衡量的关键指标的共识、总结这些指标报告细节的工具以及有效汇总报告指标的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e60d/10603506/3cb701715ec6/bmjoq-2023-002349f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e60d/10603506/3cb701715ec6/bmjoq-2023-002349f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e60d/10603506/3cb701715ec6/bmjoq-2023-002349f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying value in healthcare transformation initiatives: an evaluation of an approach to benefits realisation.确定医疗保健转型计划中的价值:一种效益实现方法的评估。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Oct;12(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002349.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.本科护生带薪岗位的可行性与结果
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006 Sep;19(3):e1-14. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2006.19032.
4
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
5
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
6
Current experience and future potential of facilitating access to digital NHS primary care services in England: the Di-Facto mixed-methods study.当前在英格兰促进获取数字国民保健服务初级保健服务的经验和未来潜力:Di-Facto 混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(32):1-197. doi: 10.3310/JKYT5803.
7
Evolving quality improvement support strategies to improve Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle fidelity: a retrospective mixed-methods study.不断发展的质量改进支持策略,以提高计划-实施-研究-行动循环的保真度:一项回顾性混合方法研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 May;28(5):356-365. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007605. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
8
Benefits realization management in the context of a national digital transformation initiative in English provider organizations.英文医疗机构国家数字化转型计划背景下的效益实现管理。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Jan 29;29(3):536-545. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab283.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Beyond Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle - staff perceptions on facilitators and barriers to the implementation of telepresence robots in long-term care.超越计划-执行-研究-行动周期 - 员工对远程呈现机器人在长期护理中实施的促进因素和障碍的看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 19;23(1):772. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09741-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Redefining Health: Implication for Value-Based Healthcare Reform.重新定义健康:对基于价值的医疗改革的启示。
Cureus. 2017 Feb 22;9(2):e1047. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1047. eCollection 2017 Feb.
2
What risks to sustainability are identified throughout care bundle implementation and how can they be addressed? A mixed methods case study.在护理捆绑包实施过程中发现了哪些可持续性风险,以及如何解决这些风险?一项混合方法的案例研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 11;11(6):e048815. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048815.
3
Criteria for evaluating programme theory diagrams in quality improvement initiatives: a structured method for appraisal.
质量改进举措中评估项目理论图的标准:一种结构化评估方法
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Aug 1;30(7):508-513. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy063.
4
Use the PDSA model for effective change management.使用PDSA模型进行有效的变革管理。
Educ Prim Care. 2015 Jul;26(4):279-81. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2015.11494356.
5
Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare.患者报告结局测量有助于改变医疗保健。
BMJ. 2013 Jan 28;346:f167. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f167.