• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Lateral tarsal strip procedure: comparison of absorbable sutures and non-absorbable polypropylene suture. Does the suture type matter?外侧睑板条手术:可吸收缝线与不可吸收聚丙烯缝线的比较。缝线类型重要吗?
Eye (Lond). 2024 Mar;38(4):752-756. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02768-6. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
2
The use of a polyglactin suture in the lateral tarsal strip procedure.聚乙醇酸缝线在睑板条外侧手术中的应用。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Oct;138(4):588-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.05.060.
3
The Looi suture technique for anchoring the lateral tarsal strip to the lateral orbital wall.用于将外侧睑板条固定于眶外侧壁的卢氏缝合技术。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2014 May;43(5):263-6.
4
Modified lateral tarsal strip for involutional entropion and ectropion surgery.改良外侧睑板条用于老年性睑内翻和睑外翻手术。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar;255(3):619-625. doi: 10.1007/s00417-016-3536-2. Epub 2016 Nov 5.
5
Involutional entropion repair with fornix sutures and lateral tarsal strip procedure.采用穹窿部缝线和外侧睑板条手术修复退行性睑内翻。
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Jul;17(4):281-7. doi: 10.1097/00002341-200107000-00008.
6
Comparison of four Combined Procedures for Correction of Involutional Lower Eyelid Entropion.四种用于矫正老年性下睑内翻联合手术的比较。
J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Jun;30(4):1239-1244. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005466.
7
A comparison of the lateral tarsal strip with everting sutures and the Quickert procedure for involutional entropion.外侧睑板条与外眦缝线和 Quickert 程序治疗退行性睑内翻的比较。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep;97(6):e933-e936. doi: 10.1111/aos.14093. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
8
Lower eyelid suspension using polypropylene suture for the correction of punctal ectropion.采用聚丙烯缝线进行下眼睑悬吊带术以矫正泪点外翻。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013 Oct;41(7):e111-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.11.036. Epub 2013 Jan 26.
9
Lower eyelid involutional ectropion repair with lateral tarsal strip and internal retractor reattachment with full-thickness eyelid sutures.采用外侧睑板条联合全层眼睑缝线行内眦韧带重新附着术修复下睑退行性外翻。
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Sep-Oct;30(5):424-6. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000218.
10
The use of a polyglactin suture in the lateral tarsal strip procedure.聚乙醇酸缝线在睑板条外侧手术中的应用。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Apr;139(4):758-9; author reply 759. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.12.032.

本文引用的文献

1
Lateral Tarsal Strip Complications With and Without Conjunctiva Stripping.伴有和不伴有结膜剥离的外侧睑板条并发症
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022;38(5):458-461. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002159. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
2
Complications Associated with Polydek Sutures Used in Eyelid Lateral Tarsal Strip Procedures.用于眼睑外侧睑板条手术的 Polydek 缝线相关并发症。
Clin Med Res. 2022 Jun;20(2):107-110. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2021.1661. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
3
Anterior approach ptosis surgery: comparison of absorbable polyglactin sutures and non-absorbable polyester sutures. Does Vicryl stand the test of time?前路上睑下垂手术:可吸收聚乳酸缝线与不可吸收聚酯缝线的比较。薇乔缝线是否经得住时间的考验?
Orbit. 2022 Oct;41(5):547-550. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2021.1958873. Epub 2021 Aug 1.
4
Bacterial Adherence Around Sutures of Different Material at Grafted Site: A Microbiological Analysis.移植部位不同材料缝线周围的细菌黏附:微生物学分析
Materials (Basel). 2019 Sep 4;12(18):2848. doi: 10.3390/ma12182848.
5
Comparison of non-absorbable silk and absorbable polyglactin sutures for external ptosis repair.不可吸收丝线与可吸收聚乙醇酸缝线用于上睑下垂修复的比较。
Orbit. 2020 Feb;39(1):18-22. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2019.1594998. Epub 2019 May 6.
6
Lateral tarsal strip versus Bick's procedure in correction of eyelid malposition.外侧跗骨带与 Bick 手术矫正眼睑位置异常的比较。
Eye (Lond). 2018 Jun;32(6):1117-1122. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0048-9. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
7
Entropion and ectropion repair: a snapshot of surgical practice in the United Kingdom.睑内翻和睑外翻修复术:英国外科手术实践概况
Orbit. 2018 Apr;37(2):105-109. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2017.1383461. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
8
Induction of immune gene expression and inflammatory mediator release by commonly used surgical suture materials: an experimental in vitro study.常用手术缝合材料诱导免疫基因表达和炎症介质释放:一项体外实验研究。
Patient Saf Surg. 2017 May 31;11:16. doi: 10.1186/s13037-017-0132-2. eCollection 2017.
9
The advantages of lateral tarsal strip procedure.跗骨条外侧手术的优势。
J Surg Tech Case Rep. 2010 Jul;2(2):63. doi: 10.4103/2006-8808.73615.
10
Bacterial adherence to suture materials.细菌对缝线材料的黏附。
J Surg Educ. 2011 Mar-Apr;68(2):101-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.09.015. Epub 2010 Nov 20.

外侧睑板条手术:可吸收缝线与不可吸收聚丙烯缝线的比较。缝线类型重要吗?

Lateral tarsal strip procedure: comparison of absorbable sutures and non-absorbable polypropylene suture. Does the suture type matter?

作者信息

Moledina Malik, Ahmed Ibrar, Ranji Ananth, Chipeta Chimwemwe, Caesar Richard, Malik Adeela

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Southend University Hospital, Southend, UK.

Ophthalmology Unit, Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, UK.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 2024 Mar;38(4):752-756. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02768-6. Epub 2023 Oct 19.

DOI:10.1038/s41433-023-02768-6
PMID:37857715
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10920783/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the success and complication rates of the Lateral Tarsal Strip (LTS) Procedure, when treating involutional ectropion/entropion, is influenced by the use of suture when attaching the tarsal strip to the periosteum.

SUBJECTS/METHODS: Multi-centre retrospective comparative study of re-operation and complication rates (Recurrence, Dehiscence, Suture Infection, Granuloma, Haemorrhage, Residual-Lid Laxity, Suture Extrusion and Repeat Procedure) in LTS, between 01/01/2017 and 01/01/2022 who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria, for involutional ectropion/entropion using an absorbable polyglactin (vicryl) and non-absorbable polypropylene suture (prolene).

RESULTS

1079 operations in 891 patients (36% female, average age 81.4 years) were performed with an average follow-up of 1.785 years. 588 operations in 475 patients were performed using prolene whilst 491 procedures in 416 patients were performed using vicryl sutures. Of these, 61% were performed by a consultant surgeon in the prolene group compared to 49.7% in the vicryl group. Overall complication rates between prolene and vicryl were 24.7% and 29.7% (p = 0.061) respectively. Higher complication rates for post-operative residual lid laxity, granuloma and suture infection were greater in the vicryl group versus prolene (2.65% and 0.51% p = 0.004, 2.24% and 0.68% p = 0.03, 1.83% and 0.17% p = 0.007 respectively). Non-significant results for dehiscence or repeat procedures (2.24% and 2.21% p = 0.974, 6.72% and 9.01% p = 0.166 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Both sutures are effective for the correction of involutional ectropion/entropion with LTS. Dehiscence and redo rates were not statistically significant. Nevertheless, the use of vicryl suture was found to be associated with a higher complication rate for: post-operative residual lid laxity, granuloma and suture infection.

摘要

背景/目的:确定在治疗退行性睑外翻/睑内翻时,外侧睑板条(LTS)手术中睑板条与骨膜附着时使用缝线是否会影响手术成功率和并发症发生率。

受试者/方法:对2017年1月1日至2022年1月1日期间符合纳入/排除标准的退行性睑外翻/睑内翻患者进行多中心回顾性比较研究,这些患者接受了LTS手术,比较使用可吸收聚乙醇酸(薇乔)缝线和不可吸收聚丙烯缝线(普理灵)时的再次手术率和并发症发生率(复发、裂开、缝线感染、肉芽肿、出血、残余眼睑松弛、缝线挤出和再次手术)。

结果

891例患者共进行了1079次手术(女性占36%,平均年龄81.4岁),平均随访1.785年。475例患者使用普理灵缝线进行了588次手术,416例患者使用薇乔缝线进行了491次手术。其中,普理灵组61%的手术由顾问外科医生进行,而薇乔组这一比例为49.7%。普理灵组和薇乔组的总体并发症发生率分别为24.7%和29.7%(p = 0.061)。薇乔组术后残余眼睑松弛、肉芽肿和缝线感染的并发症发生率高于普理灵组(分别为2.65%和0.51%,p = 0.004;2.24%和0.68%,p = 0.03;1.83%和0.17%,p = 0.007)。裂开或再次手术的结果无统计学意义(分别为2.24%和2.21%、p = 0.974;6.72%和9.01%、p = 0.166)。

结论

两种缝线在使用LTS矫正退行性睑外翻/睑内翻方面均有效。裂开率和再次手术率无统计学意义。然而,发现使用薇乔缝线与术后残余眼睑松弛、肉芽肿和缝线感染的较高并发症发生率相关。