Center of Cardiovascular Disease, Saiwai Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan.
Department of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Dec 15;209:36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.09.094. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
The impact of procedural volume on transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) outcomes in Japan remains uncertain. Japan has carefully introduced TAVR after the establishment of techniques in Western countries and therefore may not exhibit volume-outcome relations after TAVR. Data on transfemoral TAVR was collected from the Japan Transcatheter Valve Therapy (J-TVT) registry between 2018 and 2020. Hospitals were categorized into quartiles (lowest, lower, high, and highest) based on annual TAVR volume. The primary analysis compared 30-day mortality among different TAVR volume hospitals. A multivariable adjustment analysis was performed to calculate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of 30-day all-cause mortality with highest-volume hospital as the reference. A total of 2,741 transfemoral TAVR cases from 172 hospitals were included in the analysis. Median hospital TAVR volume was 38 (interquartile range 27 to 60) per year. Unadjusted 30-day mortality was 0.46%, 0.69%, 1.17%, and 1.18% from the lowest to the highest quartile of hospitals, respectively. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality rates for lowest-volume hospitals (aOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.05, p = 0.07), low-volume hospitals (aOR 0.76, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.26, p = 0.29), or high-volume hospitals (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.67, p = 0.60). An analysis from the contemporary national registry in Japan did not find an obvious inverse relation between annual hospital volume and 30-day mortality. Our results suggest that TAVR has now reached a level of procedural maturity, with standardized outcomes observed across hospitals regardless of their annual procedural volume.
日本经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的手术量对结局的影响仍不确定。日本在西方国家建立技术后,谨慎地引入了 TAVR,因此,TAVR 后可能不会表现出手术量与结局的关系。2018 年至 2020 年,从日本经导管瓣膜治疗(J-TVT)注册中心收集了经股 TAVR 数据。根据每年 TAVR 量,将医院分为四组(最低、低、高和最高)。主要分析比较了不同 TAVR 量医院的 30 天死亡率。采用多变量调整分析,计算以高容量医院为参照的 30 天全因死亡率的调整比值比(aOR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。共纳入了来自 172 家医院的 2741 例经股 TAVR 病例。医院 TAVR 量的中位数为每年 38(四分位距 27 至 60)。未经调整的 30 天死亡率分别为最低至最高四分位数医院的 0.46%、0.69%、1.17%和 1.18%。低容量医院(aOR 0.51,95%CI 0.24 至 1.05,p=0.07)、低容量医院(aOR 0.76,95%CI 0.46 至 1.26,p=0.29)或高容量医院(aOR 1.11,95%CI 0.74 至 1.67,p=0.60)的 30 天死亡率无显著差异。来自日本当代全国注册中心的分析并未发现医院年手术量与 30 天死亡率之间存在明显的反比关系。我们的结果表明,TAVR 现在已经达到了一个程序成熟的水平,无论医院的年手术量如何,都观察到了标准化的结果。