Lachnit H
Pavlov J Biol Sci. 1986 Oct-Dec;21(4):160-72.
An empirical evaluation of temporal aspects of contextual conditioning was conducted in relation to Asratyan's (1965) theory of transswitching and to an alternative explanation that was partly stimulated by the Rescorla-Wagner model (Rescorla and Wagner 1972). On the basis of a human electrodermal conditioning preparation suggested by Kimmel and Ray (1978), five groups with 12 subjects each were run. The results indicated that the basic phenomena of transswitching are robust and therefore could be replicated; but the Asratyan theory was rejected. All the results supported an alternative explanation: in contextual conditioning, duration of contextual stimuli is less important than order. Phasic switching is due to simultaneous occurrence of stimuli (differential compound conditioning) and is therefore compatible with the Rescorla-Wagner model. Tonic switching is due to signals that occur before a marked sequence of conditioning trials, in part a challenge to the Rescorla-Wagner model. Long delays between critical events can perhaps be compensated for by mediating memory processes.
针对阿斯拉蒂扬(1965年)的转换理论以及部分受雷斯克拉 - 瓦格纳模型(雷斯克拉和瓦格纳,1972年)启发而提出的另一种解释,开展了关于情境性条件作用时间方面的实证评估。基于金梅尔和雷(1978年)提出的人体皮肤电反应条件作用实验方案,对五组每组12名受试者进行了实验。结果表明,转换的基本现象很可靠,因此可以重复;但阿斯拉蒂扬理论被否定。所有结果都支持另一种解释:在情境性条件作用中,情境刺激的持续时间不如顺序重要。相位转换是由于刺激同时出现(差异复合条件作用),因此与雷斯克拉 - 瓦格纳模型相符。紧张性转换是由于在一系列显著的条件作用试验之前出现的信号,这在一定程度上对雷斯克拉 - 瓦格纳模型构成了挑战。关键事件之间的长时间延迟或许可以通过中介记忆过程得到补偿。