• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰椎间盘切除术实践中的差异评估及其在轴性背痛中的作用。

An assessment of the variation in the practice of lumbar discectomy and its role in axial back pain.

作者信息

Mishra Sandeep, Garg Kanwaljeet, Chaurasia Bipin, Budihal Bhargavi R, Deora Harsh, Tandon Vivek, Phalak Manoj, Mishra Shashwat, Kumar Amandeep, Umana G E, Lafuente Jesus, Demetriades Andreas K, Ha Yoon, Singh Manmohan, Chandra P S, Kale S S, Zileli Mehmet

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2023 Jul-Sep;14(3):259-267. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_46_23. Epub 2023 Sep 18.

DOI:10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_46_23
PMID:37860028
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10583805/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lumbar discectomy is performed for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation and is one of the most widely performed spinal surgical procedures worldwide in a variety of ways. This survey aimed at providing an overview/perspective of different practice patterns and the impact of lumbar discectomy on axial back pain with or without sciatica.

METHODS

An online survey was performed using the application "Google Forms." The link to the questionnaire was distributed to neurosurgeons through personal E-mail and social media platforms.

RESULTS

We received 333 responses. The largest percentage of responses across five continents was from Asia (66.97%, n = 223). The mean age of the respondents was 40.08 ± 10.5 years. A total of 66 respondents (20%) had a spine practice of 7%-90%, and 28 respondents had a spine practice of 90%-100% (8.4%). The number of respondents who practiced microscopic discectomy using a tubular retractor ( = 143 respondents, 42.9%) was nearly equal to the number of respondents who practiced open discectomy ( = 142 respondents, 42.6%). An almost equal proportion of respondents believed discectomy does not help in relieving axial back pain. Only 20.4% ( = 68) of respondents recommend bed rest for a longer duration postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our survey revealed that only 22.2% of spine surgeons recommended discectomy in patients with radiological disc herniation with axial back pain alone and preferred a minimally invasive method of discectomy. Almost half of them believed discectomy to be ineffective for axial low back pain and only a few recommended prolonged bed rest postoperatively.

摘要

背景

腰椎间盘切除术用于治疗有症状的腰椎间盘突出症,是全球范围内以多种方式广泛开展的脊柱外科手术之一。本调查旨在概述/透视不同的手术方式以及腰椎间盘切除术对伴或不伴坐骨神经痛的下腰部轴向疼痛的影响。

方法

使用“谷歌表单”应用程序进行在线调查。调查问卷的链接通过个人电子邮件和社交媒体平台分发给神经外科医生。

结果

我们收到了333份回复。五大洲回复比例最高的是亚洲(66.97%,n = 223)。受访者的平均年龄为40.08±10.5岁。共有66名受访者(20%)的脊柱手术量占比为7% - 90%,28名受访者的脊柱手术量占比为90% - 100%(8.4%)。采用管状牵开器进行显微椎间盘切除术的受访者数量(143名受访者,42.9%)几乎与采用开放椎间盘切除术的受访者数量(142名受访者,42.6%)相等。几乎相同比例的受访者认为椎间盘切除术无助于缓解下腰部轴向疼痛。只有20.4%(n = 68)的受访者建议术后长时间卧床休息。

结论

我们的调查显示,只有22.2%的脊柱外科医生建议对仅伴有下腰部轴向疼痛的影像学椎间盘突出症患者进行椎间盘切除术,并且更倾向于采用微创椎间盘切除方法。其中几乎一半的人认为椎间盘切除术对下腰部轴向疼痛无效,只有少数人建议术后长时间卧床休息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e58a/10583805/7ff3afead4ea/JCVJS-14-259-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e58a/10583805/e0987d6825e7/JCVJS-14-259-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e58a/10583805/02b3c0e1682a/JCVJS-14-259-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e58a/10583805/e42eeb6dc07c/JCVJS-14-259-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e58a/10583805/7ff3afead4ea/JCVJS-14-259-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e58a/10583805/e0987d6825e7/JCVJS-14-259-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e58a/10583805/02b3c0e1682a/JCVJS-14-259-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e58a/10583805/e42eeb6dc07c/JCVJS-14-259-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e58a/10583805/7ff3afead4ea/JCVJS-14-259-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
An assessment of the variation in the practice of lumbar discectomy and its role in axial back pain.腰椎间盘切除术实践中的差异评估及其在轴性背痛中的作用。
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2023 Jul-Sep;14(3):259-267. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_46_23. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
2
Management of sciatica due to lumbar disc herniation in the Netherlands: a survey among spine surgeons.荷兰腰椎间盘突出症所致坐骨神经痛的治疗:脊柱外科医生的一项调查
J Neurosurg Spine. 2008 Jul;9(1):32-9. doi: 10.3171/SPI/2008/9/7/032.
3
Management of Symptomatic Lumbar Disk Herniation: An International Perspective.腰椎间盘突出症的治疗:国际视角。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Dec 1;42(23):1826-1834. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002294.
4
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy compared with microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: 1-year results of an ongoing randomized controlled trial.经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术与显微内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项正在进行的随机对照试验的1年结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):300-310. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.SPINE161434. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
5
Open fenestration discectomy versus microscopic fenestration discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a randomized controlled trial.开窗髓核切除术与显微镜下开窗髓核切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的随机对照研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jun 15;21(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03396-x.
6
Tubular discectomy versus conventional microdiscectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: long-term results of a randomised controlled trial.管状切除术与传统微创手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项随机对照试验的长期结果。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017 Dec;88(12):1008-1016. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2016-315306. Epub 2017 May 26.
7
Effect of Lumbar Discectomy or Lumbar Decompression on Axial Back Pain: Results of a Meta-Analysis.腰椎间盘切除术或腰椎减压术对轴性背痛的影响:一项荟萃分析的结果
World Neurosurg. 2023 Sep;177:109-121. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.06.064. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
8
Cost-effectiveness of microendoscopic discectomy versus conventional open discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a prospective randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN51857546].显微内镜下椎间盘切除术与传统开放式椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的成本效益:一项前瞻性随机对照试验[ISRCTN51857546]
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 May 13;7:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-42.
9
Retrolisthesis and lumbar disc herniation: a postoperative assessment of outcomes at 8-year follow-up.退变性腰椎滑脱症和腰椎间盘突出症:8 年随访的术后疗效评估。
Spine J. 2019 Jun;19(6):995-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.12.010. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
10
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus microendoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis.经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术与显微镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Int Orthop. 2019 Apr;43(4):923-937. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4253-8. Epub 2018 Dec 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing insights into recurrent lumbar disc herniation: A comparative analysis of surgical approaches and a new classification.复发性腰椎间盘突出症的研究进展:手术方法的比较分析及一种新分类法
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2024 Jan-Mar;15(1):66-73. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_177_23. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
2
Management of recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a comparative analysis of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and repeat discectomy.复发性腰椎间盘突出症的治疗:后路腰椎椎间融合术与再次椎间盘切除术的对比分析
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Jan 3;86(2):842-849. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001600. eCollection 2024 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Does discectomy improve low back pain as well as radiating pain in patients with lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (HIVD)?腰椎间盘突出症患者行椎间盘切除术能否改善腰痛及放射痛?
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jan 7;101(1):e27559. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027559.
2
Clinicians' perceptions around discectomy surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a survey of orthopaedic and neuro-surgeons in Australia and New Zealand.临床医生对腰椎间盘突出症椎间盘切除术的看法:对澳大利亚和新西兰骨科医生和神经外科医生的一项调查
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jan;143(1):189-201. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04019-3. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
3
Comparison of Different Operative Approaches for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.
不同腰椎间盘突出症手术治疗方法的比较:网络荟萃分析和系统评价。
Pain Physician. 2021 Jul;24(4):E381-E392.
4
Survey of lumbar discectomy practices: 10 years in the making.腰椎间盘切除术实践调查:历时十年完成。
J Spine Surg. 2020 Sep;6(3):572-580. doi: 10.21037/jss-20-519.
5
Outcomes after decompression surgery without fusion for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and substantial low back pain.腰椎管狭窄症伴大量下腰痛患者减压手术后的结果。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Jan;29(1):147-152. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06130-x. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
6
Factors Affecting Surgical Decision-making-A Qualitative Study.影响手术决策的因素——一项定性研究
Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2018 Jan 29;9(1):e0003. doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10324.
7
Management of Symptomatic Lumbar Disk Herniation: An International Perspective.腰椎间盘突出症的治疗:国际视角。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Dec 1;42(23):1826-1834. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002294.
8
Tubular discectomy versus conventional microdiscectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: long-term results of a randomised controlled trial.管状切除术与传统微创手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项随机对照试验的长期结果。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017 Dec;88(12):1008-1016. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2016-315306. Epub 2017 May 26.
9
Learning curves for minimally invasive spine surgeries: Are they worth it?微创脊柱手术的学习曲线:它们值得吗?
Surg Neurol Int. 2017 Apr 26;8:61. doi: 10.4103/sni.sni_39_17. eCollection 2017.
10
Differences in the Surgical Treatment of Lower Back Pain Among Spine Surgeons in the United States.美国脊柱外科医生在腰痛手术治疗方面的差异。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jun;41(11):978-986. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001396.