• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于追随者-领导者聚类算法(FLCA)的聚类分析综合方法:文献计量分析。

A comprehensive approach for clustering analysis using follower-leading clustering algorithm (FLCA): Bibliometric analysis.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Liouying, Tainan, Taiwan.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Oct 20;102(42):e35156. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035156.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000035156
PMID:37861508
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10589539/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are 3 issues in bibliometrics that need to be addressed: The lack of a clear definition for author collaborations in cluster analysis that takes into account collaborations with and without self-connections; The need to develop a simple yet effective clustering algorithm for use in coword analysis, and; The inadequacy of general bibliometrics in regard to comparing research achievements and identifying articles that are worth reading and recommended for readers. The study aimed to put forth a clustering algorithm for cluster analysis (called following leader clustering [FLCA], a follower-leading clustering algorithm), examine the dissimilarities in cluster outcomes when considering collaborations with and without self-connections in cluster analysis, and demonstrate the application of the clustering algorithm in bibliometrics.

METHODS

The study involved a search for articles and review articles published in JMIR Medical Informatics between 2016 and 2022, conducted using the Web of Science core collections. To identify author collaborations (ACs) and themes over the past 7 years, the study utilized the FLCA algorithm. With the 3 objectives of; Comparing the results obtained from scenarios with and without self-connections; Applying the FLCA algorithm in ACs and themes, and; Reporting the findings using traditional bibliometric approaches based on counts and citations, and all plots were created using R.

RESULTS

The study found a significant difference in cluster outcomes between the 2 scenarios with and without self-connections, with a 53.8% overlap (14 out of the top 20 countries in ACs). The top clusters were led by Yonsei University in South Korea, Grang Luo from the US, and model in institutes, authors, and themes over the past 7 years. The top entities with the most publications in JMIR Medical Informatics were the United States, Yonsei University in South Korea, Medical School, and Grang Luo from the US.

CONCLUSION

The FLCA algorithm proposed in this study offers researchers a comprehensive approach to exploring and comprehending the complex connections among authors or keywords. The study suggests that future research on ACs with cluster analysis should employ FLCA and R visualizations.

摘要

背景

文献计量学存在 3 个问题需要解决:在聚类分析中,缺乏考虑有自我连接和无自我连接的合著者合作的明确定义;需要开发一种简单而有效的聚类算法,用于共词分析;以及一般文献计量学在比较研究成果和确定值得读者阅读和推荐的文章方面的不足。本研究旨在提出一种聚类算法(称为跟随领导者聚类[FLCA],一种追随者-领导者聚类算法)用于聚类分析,检查在聚类分析中考虑有自我连接和无自我连接的合著者合作时聚类结果的差异,并展示聚类算法在文献计量学中的应用。

方法

本研究使用 Web of Science 核心集搜索了 2016 年至 2022 年期间在 JMIR 医学信息学上发表的文章和综述文章,以识别过去 7 年的作者合作(AC)和主题,使用 FLCA 算法。研究的 3 个目标是:比较有自我连接和无自我连接的情景的结果;在 AC 和主题中应用 FLCA 算法;使用基于计数和引文的传统文献计量方法报告发现,所有图表均使用 R 创建。

结果

研究发现,在有自我连接和无自我连接的 2 种情景之间,聚类结果存在显著差异,重叠率为 53.8%(AC 排名前 20 位的国家中有 14 个)。顶级聚类由韩国延世大学、美国的 Grang Luo 和过去 7 年的模型研究所、作者和主题引领。在 JMIR 医学信息学上发表文章最多的顶级实体是美国、韩国延世大学、医学院和美国的 Grang Luo。

结论

本研究提出的 FLCA 算法为研究人员提供了一种全面的方法来探索和理解作者或关键字之间的复杂联系。研究建议,未来的 AC 聚类分析研究应采用 FLCA 和 R 可视化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff82/10589539/1d67044b9d3f/medi-102-e35156-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff82/10589539/df24f1379bce/medi-102-e35156-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff82/10589539/16f7f800f0aa/medi-102-e35156-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff82/10589539/ca6df7659471/medi-102-e35156-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff82/10589539/295e542efa79/medi-102-e35156-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff82/10589539/8dbd48dba5ff/medi-102-e35156-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff82/10589539/312aac031cee/medi-102-e35156-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff82/10589539/94a3ba91e59c/medi-102-e35156-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff82/10589539/b7978fbff2ba/medi-102-e35156-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff82/10589539/1d67044b9d3f/medi-102-e35156-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff82/10589539/df24f1379bce/medi-102-e35156-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff82/10589539/16f7f800f0aa/medi-102-e35156-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff82/10589539/ca6df7659471/medi-102-e35156-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff82/10589539/295e542efa79/medi-102-e35156-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff82/10589539/8dbd48dba5ff/medi-102-e35156-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff82/10589539/312aac031cee/medi-102-e35156-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff82/10589539/94a3ba91e59c/medi-102-e35156-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff82/10589539/b7978fbff2ba/medi-102-e35156-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff82/10589539/1d67044b9d3f/medi-102-e35156-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
A comprehensive approach for clustering analysis using follower-leading clustering algorithm (FLCA): Bibliometric analysis.基于追随者-领导者聚类算法(FLCA)的聚类分析综合方法:文献计量分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Oct 20;102(42):e35156. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035156.
2
Analyzing author collaborations by developing a follower-leader clustering algorithm and identifying top co-authoring countries: Cluster analysis.通过开发追随者-领导者聚类算法和识别顶级合作国家来分析作者合作:聚类分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jul 21;102(29):e34158. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034158.
3
Visual impact beam plots: Analyzing research profiles and bibliometric metrics using the following-leading clustering algorithm (FLCA).视觉影响束图:使用以下领先聚类算法(FLCA)分析研究概况和文献计量指标。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jul 14;102(28):e34301. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034301.
4
Analyzing fulminant myocarditis research trends and characteristics using the follower-leading clustering algorithm (FLCA): A bibliometric study.使用追随者-领先者聚类算法(FLCA)分析暴发性心肌炎研究趋势和特征:一项文献计量学研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jun 30;102(26):e34169. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034169.
5
A modern approach with follower-leading clustering algorithm for visualizing author collaborations and article themes in skin cancer research: A bibliometric analysis.一种采用追随者领先聚类算法的现代方法,用于可视化皮肤癌研究中的作者合作和文章主题:文献计量分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Nov 3;102(44):e34801. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034801.
6
Differences in productivity and collaboration patterns on spine-related research between neurosurgeons and orthopedic spine surgeons: Bibliometric analysis.神经外科医生和骨科脊柱外科医生在脊柱相关研究中的生产力和合作模式的差异:文献计量分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Oct 20;102(42):e35563. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035563.
7
Trends and hotspots related to traditional and modern approaches on acupuncture for stroke: A bibliometric and visualization analysis.针灸治疗中风的传统与现代方法的趋势和热点:文献计量学和可视化分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 1;102(48):e35332. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035332.
8
Developing a novel algorithm for comparing cluster patterns in networks on journal articles during and after COVID-19: Bibliometric analysis.开发一种用于比较 COVID-19 期间和之后期刊文章网络中聚类模式的新算法:文献计量分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Mar 22;103(12):e37530. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037530.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Evaluating cluster analysis techniques in ChatGPT versus R-language with visualizations of author collaborations and keyword cooccurrences on articles in the Journal of Medicine (Baltimore) 2023: Bibliometric analysis.评估 ChatGPT 与 R 语言中的聚类分析技术,通过对《巴尔的摩医学杂志》2023 年文章的作者合作和关键词共现的可视化进行比较:文献计量分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 8;102(49):e36154. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036154.

引用本文的文献

1
Unexpected aberrant data patterns on slope graphs to examine article characteristics: Say good-bye to the burst bar chart in bibliometrics.用于检查文章特征的斜率图上出现意外的异常数据模式:告别文献计量学中的爆发式柱状图。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 29;104(35):e42657. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042657.
2
Evaluating the dependability of reference-driven citation forecasts amid the COVID-19 pandemic: A bibliometric analysis across diverse journals.评估 COVID-19 大流行期间基于参考文献的引文预测的可靠性:跨不同期刊的文献计量分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jan 19;103(3):e36219. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036219.