Verhoeven Amy, Kornkven Joan
Biology Department (OWS352), University of St Thomas, 2115 Summit Ave, St Paul, MN 55105 USA.
Tree Physiol. 2024 Feb 6;44(1). doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpad131.
Conifers growing in temperate forests utilize sustained forms of thermal dissipation during winter to protect the photosynthetic apparatus from damage, which can be monitored via pronounced reductions in photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) during winter. Eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.) and white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) are known to recover from winter stress at different rates, with pine recovering more slowly than spruce, suggesting different mechanisms for sustained dissipation in these species. Our objectives were to monitor pine and spruce throughout spring recovery in order to provide insights into key mechanisms for sustained dissipation in both species. We measured chlorophyll fluorescence, pigments, and abundance and phosphorylation status of key photosynthetic proteins. We found that both species rely on two forms of sustained dissipation involving retention of high amounts of antheraxanthin (A) + zeaxanthin (Z), one that is very slowly reversible and temperature independent and one that is more dynamic and occurs only on subzero days. Differences in protein abundance suggest that spruce, but not pine, likely upregulates cyclic or alternative pathways of electron transport involving the cytochrome b6f complex and photosystem I (PSI). Both species show an increased sustained phosphorylation of the D1 protein on subzero days, and spruce additionally shows dramatic increases in the sustained phosphorylation of light-harvesting complex II (LHCII) and other PSII core proteins on subzero days only, suggesting that a mechanism of sustained dissipation that is temperature dependent requires sustained phosphorylation of photosynthetic proteins in spruce, possibly allowing for direct energy transfer from PSII to PSI as a mechanism of photoprotection. The data suggest differences in strategy among conifers in mechanisms of sustained thermal dissipation in response to winter stress. Additionally, the flexible induction of sustained A + Z and phosphorylation of photosynthetic proteins in response to subzero temperatures during spring recovery seem to be important in providing photoprotection during transitional periods with high temperature fluctuation.
生长在温带森林中的针叶树在冬季利用持续的热耗散形式来保护光合器官免受损害,这可以通过冬季光化学效率(Fv/Fm)的显著降低来监测。已知东部白松(Pinus strobus L.)和白云杉(Picea glauca (Moench) Voss)从冬季胁迫中恢复的速度不同,松树比云杉恢复得更慢,这表明这两个物种中持续耗散的机制不同。我们的目标是在整个春季恢复过程中监测松树和云杉,以便深入了解这两个物种持续耗散的关键机制。我们测量了叶绿素荧光、色素以及关键光合蛋白的丰度和磷酸化状态。我们发现这两个物种都依赖两种持续耗散形式,其中涉及保留大量的花药黄质(A)+玉米黄质(Z),一种是非常缓慢可逆且与温度无关的,另一种更具动态性且仅在零下温度的日子里发生。蛋白质丰度的差异表明,云杉可能上调了涉及细胞色素b6f复合体和光系统I(PSI)的电子传递循环或替代途径,但松树没有。这两个物种在零下温度的日子里都显示出D1蛋白持续磷酸化增加,并且云杉仅在零下温度的日子里还显示出光捕获复合体II(LHCII)和其他PSII核心蛋白的持续磷酸化显著增加,这表明在云杉中一种依赖温度的持续耗散机制需要光合蛋白的持续磷酸化,这可能允许作为一种光保护机制从PSII直接向PSI进行能量转移。数据表明针叶树在应对冬季胁迫的持续热耗散机制方面存在策略差异。此外,在春季恢复期间,对零下温度做出反应时,持续的A + Z的灵活诱导以及光合蛋白的磷酸化似乎对于在温度波动较大的过渡时期提供光保护很重要。