Suppr超能文献

同期放化疗中升压方案对新诊断 IDH 野生型多形性胶质母细胞瘤的影响。

Impact of boost sequence in concurrent chemo-radiotherapy on newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype glioblastoma multiforme.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Neurooncol. 2023 Nov;165(2):261-268. doi: 10.1007/s11060-023-04465-6. Epub 2023 Oct 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The standard of care for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is maximal surgical resection followed by conventional fractionated concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with a total dose of 60 Gy. However, there is currently no consensus on the optimal boost technique for CCRT in GBM.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 398 patients treated with CCRT between 2016 and 2021, using data from two institutional databases. Patients were divided into two groups: those receiving sequential boost (SEB, N = 119) and those receiving simultaneous integrated boost (SIB, N = 279). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). To minimize differences between the SIB and SEB groups, we conducted propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 18.6 months. Before PSM, SEB showed better OS compared to SIB (2-year, 55.6% vs. 44.5%, p = 0.014). However, after PSM, there was no significant difference between two groups (2-year, 55.6% vs. 51.5%, p = 0.300). The boost sequence was not associated with inferior OS before and after PSM (all p-values > 0.05). Additionally, the rates of symptomatic pseudo-progression were similar between the two groups (odds ratio: 1.75, p = 0.055).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found no significant difference in OS between SEB and SIB for GBM patients treated with CCRT. Further research is needed to validate these findings and to determine the optimal boost techniques for this patient population.

摘要

背景

胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)的标准治疗方法是最大限度地进行手术切除,然后进行常规分割同步放化疗(CCRT),总剂量为 60Gy。然而,目前对于 GBM 中 CCRT 的最佳推量技术尚无共识。

方法

我们对 2016 年至 2021 年间接受 CCRT 治疗的 398 例患者进行了回顾性研究,使用了来自两个机构数据库的数据。患者分为两组:接受序贯推量(SEB,N=119)和同时整合推量(SIB,N=279)。主要终点是总生存期(OS)。为了最大限度地减少 SIB 和 SEB 组之间的差异,我们进行了倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析。

结果

中位随访时间为 18.6 个月。在 PSM 之前,SEB 组的 OS 优于 SIB 组(2 年,55.6% vs. 44.5%,p=0.014)。然而,PSM 后,两组间无显著差异(2 年,55.6% vs. 51.5%,p=0.300)。在 PSM 前后,推量顺序与较差的 OS 无关(所有 p 值均>0.05)。此外,两组的症状性假性进展发生率相似(优势比:1.75,p=0.055)。

结论

本研究发现,接受 CCRT 治疗的 GBM 患者中,SEB 和 SIB 的 OS 无显著差异。需要进一步研究来验证这些发现,并确定该患者人群的最佳推量技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验