Environmental Protection and Compliance Division, Environmental Stewardship Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, P.O. Box 1663, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.
Environmental Protection and Compliance Division, Environmental Stewardship Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, P.O. Box 1663, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA.
J Environ Radioact. 2023 Dec;270:107312. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2023.107312. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
Protection of the environment from radiation fundamentally relies on dose assessments for non-human biota. Many of these dose assessments use measured or predicted concentrations of radionuclides in soil or water combined with Concentration Ratios (CRs) to estimate whole body concentrations in animals and plants, yet there is a paucity of CR data relative to the vast number of potential taxa and radioactive contaminants in the environment and their taxon-specific ecosystems. Because there are many taxa each having very different behaviors and biology, and there are many possible bioavailable radionuclides, CRs have the potential to vary by orders-of-magnitude, as often seen in published data. Given the diversity of taxa, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) has selected 12 non-human biota as reference animals and plants (RAPs), while the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) uses the non-taxon specific categories of terrestrial, riparian, and aquatic animals. The question we examine here, in part, is: are these RAPs and categorizations sufficient to adequately protect all species given the broad diversity of animals in a region? To explore this question, we utilize an Allometric-Kinetic (A-K) model to calculate radionuclide-specific CRs for common animal classes, which are then further subcategorized into herbivores, omnivores, carnivores, and invertebrate detritivores. Comparisons in CRs among animal classes exhibited only small differences, but there was order of magnitude differences between herbivores, carnivores, and especially detritivores, for many radionuclides of interest. These findings suggest that the ICRP RAPs and the DOE categories are reasonable, but their accuracy could be improved by including sub-categories related to animal dietary ecology and biology. Finally, comparisons of A-K model predicted CR values to published CRs show order-of-magnitude variations, providing justification for additional studies of animal assimilation across radionuclides, environmental conditions, and animal classes.
从根本上说,保护环境免受辐射的危害依赖于对非人类生物群的剂量评估。许多此类剂量评估使用土壤或水中测量或预测的放射性核素浓度,并结合浓度比(CR)来估计动物和植物的全身浓度,但相对于环境中大量潜在的分类群和放射性污染物及其特定于分类群的生态系统,CR 数据相对较少。由于有许多分类群,每个分类群都有非常不同的行为和生物学特性,而且可能有许多可生物利用的放射性核素,因此 CR 可能会发生数量级的变化,正如已发表的数据中经常看到的那样。鉴于分类群的多样性,国际辐射防护委员会(ICRP)选择了 12 种非人类生物群作为参考动物和植物(RAP),而美国能源部(DOE)则使用非分类群特定的陆生、河岸和水生动物类别。我们在这里部分探讨的问题是:鉴于一个地区动物的广泛多样性,这些 RAP 和分类是否足以充分保护所有物种?为了探讨这个问题,我们利用一种新陈代谢-动力学(A-K)模型来计算常见动物类别的放射性核素特异性 CR,然后将其进一步细分为食草动物、杂食动物、肉食动物和无脊椎动物碎屑食者。动物类群之间的 CR 比较仅显示出微小差异,但对于许多感兴趣的放射性核素,食草动物、肉食动物,特别是碎屑食者之间存在数量级差异。这些发现表明,ICRP 的 RAP 和 DOE 的分类是合理的,但通过包括与动物饮食生态和生物学相关的亚类,可以提高其准确性。最后,将 A-K 模型预测的 CR 值与已发表的 CR 值进行比较,显示出数量级的变化,这为进一步研究跨放射性核素、环境条件和动物类群的动物同化作用提供了依据。