Witte Paul Jonathan, Schröder Ann Sophie, Sperhake Jan-Peter, Ondruschka Benjamin
Institut für Rechtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Gesundheitswesen. 2023 Dec;85(12):1200-1204. doi: 10.1055/a-2098-3164. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
The death of a person and the circumstances of death are documented on the death certificate in Germany. The path of the corpse to burial as well as the quality of the cause of death statistics are significantly influenced by the information in the official death certificate. The quality of the information in the death certificates has been repeatedly criticized. The aim of the present study was to identify typical sources of error in death certificates and to obtain information on whether qualitative differences exist between death certificates completed in the outpatient and inpatient sectors. A retrospective evaluation was performed of 218 death certificates of deaths examined by the Institute of Legal Medicine as part of a second postmortem examination prior to cremation. Of these, 118 death certificates were issued in the hospital and 100 death certificates were issued on an outpatient basis by the family physician or a physician on duty in the outpatient sector. All but one of the death certificates issued on an outpatient basis were legible. The information on the underlying disease was plausible. More than one-third of the epicrises had no significant findings or were not completed at all. The entry on the immediate causes of death in the designated field on the death certificate (Ia in the causal chain) were inadequate in one third of the cases. The error rate in the entries was higher in outpatient than in inpatient deaths. In the future, therefore, it will be necessary to prepare for the special situation of a post-mortem examination by means of further and advanced training events and to convey the importance of the diagnoses determined in the process, in order to eliminate these avoidable sources of error.
在德国,一个人的死亡及死亡情况会记录在死亡证明上。尸体的埋葬路径以及死因统计的质量会受到官方死亡证明中信息的显著影响。死亡证明中信息的质量一直备受批评。本研究的目的是确定死亡证明中典型的错误来源,并获取关于门诊和住院部门填写的死亡证明之间是否存在质量差异的信息。对法医学研究所作为火化前二次尸检一部分检查的218份死亡证明进行了回顾性评估。其中,118份死亡证明由医院出具,100份死亡证明由家庭医生或门诊部门值班医生在门诊出具。除一份门诊出具的死亡证明外,其他所有证明都清晰可读。关于潜在疾病的信息似乎合理。超过三分之一的病历摘要没有显著发现或根本未完成。死亡证明指定字段(因果链中的Ia)中关于直接死因的填写在三分之一的病例中不充分。门诊死亡病例填写的错误率高于住院死亡病例。因此,未来有必要通过进一步的高级培训活动来应对尸检的特殊情况,并传达在此过程中确定的诊断的重要性,以消除这些可避免的错误来源。