Suppr超能文献

[死亡证明信息:住院部与门诊部的比较]

[Information on Death Certificates: Comparison Between Inpatient and Outpatient Sectors].

作者信息

Witte Paul Jonathan, Schröder Ann Sophie, Sperhake Jan-Peter, Ondruschka Benjamin

机构信息

Institut für Rechtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.

出版信息

Gesundheitswesen. 2023 Dec;85(12):1200-1204. doi: 10.1055/a-2098-3164. Epub 2023 Oct 20.

Abstract

The death of a person and the circumstances of death are documented on the death certificate in Germany. The path of the corpse to burial as well as the quality of the cause of death statistics are significantly influenced by the information in the official death certificate. The quality of the information in the death certificates has been repeatedly criticized. The aim of the present study was to identify typical sources of error in death certificates and to obtain information on whether qualitative differences exist between death certificates completed in the outpatient and inpatient sectors. A retrospective evaluation was performed of 218 death certificates of deaths examined by the Institute of Legal Medicine as part of a second postmortem examination prior to cremation. Of these, 118 death certificates were issued in the hospital and 100 death certificates were issued on an outpatient basis by the family physician or a physician on duty in the outpatient sector. All but one of the death certificates issued on an outpatient basis were legible. The information on the underlying disease was plausible. More than one-third of the epicrises had no significant findings or were not completed at all. The entry on the immediate causes of death in the designated field on the death certificate (Ia in the causal chain) were inadequate in one third of the cases. The error rate in the entries was higher in outpatient than in inpatient deaths. In the future, therefore, it will be necessary to prepare for the special situation of a post-mortem examination by means of further and advanced training events and to convey the importance of the diagnoses determined in the process, in order to eliminate these avoidable sources of error.

摘要

在德国,一个人的死亡及死亡情况会记录在死亡证明上。尸体的埋葬路径以及死因统计的质量会受到官方死亡证明中信息的显著影响。死亡证明中信息的质量一直备受批评。本研究的目的是确定死亡证明中典型的错误来源,并获取关于门诊和住院部门填写的死亡证明之间是否存在质量差异的信息。对法医学研究所作为火化前二次尸检一部分检查的218份死亡证明进行了回顾性评估。其中,118份死亡证明由医院出具,100份死亡证明由家庭医生或门诊部门值班医生在门诊出具。除一份门诊出具的死亡证明外,其他所有证明都清晰可读。关于潜在疾病的信息似乎合理。超过三分之一的病历摘要没有显著发现或根本未完成。死亡证明指定字段(因果链中的Ia)中关于直接死因的填写在三分之一的病例中不充分。门诊死亡病例填写的错误率高于住院死亡病例。因此,未来有必要通过进一步的高级培训活动来应对尸检的特殊情况,并传达在此过程中确定的诊断的重要性,以消除这些可避免的错误来源。

相似文献

6
[Quality of death certificates in hospitals].
Arch Kriminol. 2016 Nov;238(5-6):198-206.
8
Does smoking kill? A study of death certification and smoking.吸烟是否致命?一项关于死亡证明和吸烟的研究。
J Clin Pathol. 2012 Feb;65(2):129-32. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200299. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
9
[Death certificates for suicides: quality investigation based on police records].[自杀死亡证明:基于警方记录的质量调查]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2019 Dec;62(12):1422-1426. doi: 10.1007/s00103-019-03039-0.
10
[The postmortem examination and death certificate by the general practitioner: problems with certification on site].[全科医生的尸检及死亡证明:现场认证问题]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2019 Dec;62(12):1446-1451. doi: 10.1007/s00103-019-03044-3.

引用本文的文献

1
[Piloting an electronic death certificate (eTB app)-physicians' user experiences].[试用电子死亡证明(eTB应用程序)——医生的用户体验]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025 Jul;68(7):818-826. doi: 10.1007/s00103-025-04082-w. Epub 2025 Jun 2.

本文引用的文献

1
[Forensic postmortem examination service: challenges and opportunities].
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2019 Dec;62(12):1433-1437. doi: 10.1007/s00103-019-03041-6.
3
[Qualified post-mortem examination-experiences from Bremen].[合格的尸检——不来梅的经验]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2019 Dec;62(12):1427-1432. doi: 10.1007/s00103-019-03040-7.
4
[Quality of death certificates in hospitals].
Arch Kriminol. 2016 Nov;238(5-6):198-206.
6
[Mortality statistics in Germany. Problems and perspectives].[德国的死亡率统计。问题与展望]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2007 Jul;50(7):969-76. doi: 10.1007/s00103-007-0287-6.
8
[The practice of medical postmortem examination].[医学尸体解剖实践]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2001 Jun 15;126(24):712-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-15033.
9
Comparison of the clinical and post mortem diagnoses of the causes of death.
Forensic Sci Int. 2000 Nov 13;114(2):117-9. doi: 10.1016/s0379-0738(00)00329-7.
10
Limitations of the forensic external examination in determining the cause and manner of death.
Hum Pathol. 1987 Feb;18(2):170-4. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(87)80335-0.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验