1Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
2Ridgetown Campus, Ontario Agricultural College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2023 Oct 20;262(1):100-108. doi: 10.2460/javma.23.02.0089. Print 2024 Jan 1.
To explore pet owners' use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) during virtual veterinarian-client-patient consultations and to examine pet owners' attitudes toward virtual consultations.
714 pet owners.
In an anonymous online survey distributed using snowball sampling, all participants were asked about utilization of ICTs, preferred method of interaction (face-to-face and 5 ICTs), opinion on virtual communication, and demographics. Sentiment toward virtual veterinarian consultations was measured for participants who had experienced a "virtual only" or "combination virtual and face-to-face" consultation in the previous 6 months using the Net Promoter Score. For these participants, multivariable logistic regression was used to explore factors associated with recommending virtual consultations.
92% (583/632) of participants resided in Ontario, Canada. Most (85.6% [611/714]) participants had experience using the telephone for veterinary care, while only 5.2% (37/714) had used live videoconferencing. Participants ranked face-to-face interactions as most preferred (P < .001), followed by telephone and then live videoconferencing. Participants were significantly (P < .001) less confident communicating during virtual consultations, particularly for building rapport. For participants experiencing a virtual consultation in the previous 6 months (n = 348), the overall Net Promoter Score was neutral at -1.43. Participants were divided about recommending virtual consultations, with 33.3% (116/348) being promoters and 34.8% (121/348) being detractors. Age of participant and comfort using videoconferencing were positively associated (P < .05) with recommending virtual consultations.
Although participating pet owners significantly preferred face-to-face consultations with veterinarians, many appear willing to consider virtual consultations. Further exploration of pet owners' preferences and concerns around virtual care, including communication, is needed.
探讨宠物主人在虚拟兽医-客户-患者咨询期间使用信息和通信技术(ICTs)的情况,并研究宠物主人对虚拟咨询的态度。
714 名宠物主人。
在一项使用雪球抽样法进行的匿名在线调查中,所有参与者均被问及 ICTs 的使用情况、首选的互动方式(面对面和 5 种 ICTs)、对虚拟交流的看法以及人口统计学信息。对于在过去 6 个月内经历过“仅虚拟”或“虚拟和面对面结合”咨询的参与者,使用净推荐值(Net Promoter Score)衡量他们对虚拟兽医咨询的态度。对于这些参与者,使用多变量逻辑回归探索与推荐虚拟咨询相关的因素。
92%(583/632)的参与者居住在加拿大安大略省。大多数(85.6%[611/714])参与者有过使用电话进行兽医护理的经验,而只有 5.2%(37/714)使用过实时视频会议。参与者将面对面互动评为最受欢迎的方式(P<.001),其次是电话,然后是实时视频会议。参与者在虚拟咨询中沟通的信心明显较低(P<.001),特别是在建立融洽关系方面。对于在过去 6 个月内经历过虚拟咨询的参与者(n=348),总体净推荐值为中性-1.43。参与者对推荐虚拟咨询的看法存在分歧,33.3%(116/348)的参与者为推荐者,34.8%(121/348)的参与者为贬低者。参与者的年龄和使用视频会议的舒适度与推荐虚拟咨询呈正相关(P<.05)。
尽管参与的宠物主人非常喜欢与兽医进行面对面咨询,但许多人似乎愿意考虑虚拟咨询。需要进一步探讨宠物主人对虚拟护理的偏好和关注,包括沟通问题。