Newton Ferrers, Plymouth, UK.
Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
J Pain. 2024 Apr;25(4):833-842. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.10.009. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
Cannabidiol (CBD) attracts considerable attention for promoting good health and treating various conditions, predominantly pain, often in breach of advertising rules. Examination of available CBD products in North America and Europe demonstrates that CBD content can vary from none to much more than advertised and that potentially harmful other chemicals are often included. Serious harm is associated with chemicals found in CBD products and reported in children, adults, and the elderly. A 2021 International Association for the Study of Pain task force examined the evidence for cannabinoids and pain but found no trials of CBD. Sixteen CBD randomized trials using pharmaceutical-supplied CBD or making preparations from such a source and with pain as an outcome have been published subsequently. The trials were conducted in 12 different pain states, using 3 oral, topical, and buccal/sublingual administration, with CBD doses between 6 and 1,600 mg, and durations of treatment between a single dose and 12 weeks. Fifteen of the 16 showed no benefit of CBD over placebo. Small clinical trials using verified CBD suggest the drug to be largely benign; while large-scale evidence of safety is lacking, there is growing evidence linking CBD to increased rates of serious adverse events and hepatotoxicity. In January 2023, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced that a new regulatory pathway for CBD was needed. Consumers and health care providers should rely on evidence-based sources of information on CBD, not just advertisements. Current evidence is that CBD for pain is expensive, ineffective, and possibly harmful. PERSPECTIVE: There is no good reason for thinking that CBD relieves pain, but there are good reasons for doubting the contents of CBD products in terms of CBD content and purity.
大麻二酚(CBD)在促进健康和治疗各种疾病方面引起了广泛关注,尤其是疼痛,而且经常违反广告规则。对北美和欧洲现有 CBD 产品的检查表明,CBD 含量可能从无到远远超过广告宣传,而且经常包含潜在有害的其他化学物质。在儿童、成人和老年人中,与 CBD 产品中发现的化学物质相关的严重伤害时有报道。2021 年,国际疼痛研究协会专门研究了大麻素和疼痛的证据,但没有发现 CBD 的试验。随后发表了 16 项使用药物供应的 CBD 或从这种来源制备并以疼痛为结果的 CBD 随机试验。这些试验在 12 种不同的疼痛状态下进行,使用 3 种口服、局部和颊/舌下给药方式,CBD 剂量在 6 至 1600mg 之间,治疗时间从单次剂量到 12 周不等。16 项试验中的 15 项均未显示 CBD 优于安慰剂。使用经过验证的 CBD 进行的小型临床试验表明该药物基本上是良性的;虽然缺乏大规模的安全性证据,但越来越多的证据表明 CBD 与严重不良事件和肝毒性发生率增加有关。2023 年 1 月,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)宣布需要为 CBD 建立新的监管途径。消费者和医疗保健提供者应该依赖于关于 CBD 的基于证据的信息来源,而不仅仅是广告。目前的证据表明,CBD 治疗疼痛既昂贵、无效,而且可能有害。观点:没有充分的理由认为 CBD 能缓解疼痛,但有充分的理由怀疑 CBD 产品的 CBD 含量和纯度。