• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的时间趋势:2000年至2021年的回顾性分析

Temporal trends in percutaneous coronary intervention in Australia: A retrospective analysis from 2000-2021.

作者信息

Kumsa Netsanet B, Kelly Thu-Lan, Roughead Elizabeth E, Tavella Rosanna, Gillam Marianne H

机构信息

Clinical and Health Sciences, The Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, University of South Australia, Australia.

Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

Hellenic J Cardiol. 2024 Nov-Dec;80:21-30. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2023.10.002. Epub 2023 Oct 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.hjc.2023.10.002
PMID:37863429
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe the trend in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with insertion of a stent in Australia from 2000/01 to 2020/21 and investigate trends in same-day versus non-same-day discharge following PCI. A secondary aim was to compare the rate of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with PCI procedures, while a third aim was to compare marked PCI trend changes with the PCI guidelines during the study period.

BACKGROUND

PCI with stent deployment is the most common form of interventional treatment for coronary artery disease, and its use has been expanding since 2000. However, there is a lack of descriptive studies of the national trend in Australia.

METHODS

All procedures for PCI and CABG were extracted across 21 years (2000/01 to 2020/21) from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare data. Age-standardized rates were calculated using the Australian standard population as of June 2001. The ratio of PCI to CABG procedures was also calculated. Trends for PCI were stratified by age, gender, and same-day or overnight discharge episodes. Linear regression analysis was done to compare the age-standardized rates across different age categories. Segmented regression analysis was performed to ascertain the change in the age-standardized rates of PCI during the study period. Whether the changepoints in the trend were matched with guideline updates was also assessed.

RESULTS

There were 751 728 PCI procedures in persons aged 30 years and above between 2000/01 and 2020/21. The age-standardized rate for the study period showed that persons aged 60-74 years had a higher rate of procedures (102.7) compared to persons aged 30-59 years (81.3) and 75 years and older (61.8) (P < 0.001). There were two statistically significant changepoints in the overall trend; 2005/06 and 2013/14, matched with the change in PCI guidelines. Despite the lower number of procedures for same-day discharge episodes, there has been an increasing trend since 2014/15. More than two-thirds of all stenting procedures were the insertion of a single stent. PCI to CABG procedure ratio increased from 0.6 in 2000/01 to 1.8 in 2020/21.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a varying trend in the age-standardized rate of PCI with a peak in 2005/06. The trend appears to be stabilizing in the later part of the study period, but the rate for same-day discharge episodes showed an increasing trend after 2014/15. There is consistency with changepoints in the trend and updated PCI guideline recommendations. The ratio of PCI with insertion of a stent to CABG procedure increased substantially across the study period.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述2000/01至2020/21年澳大利亚经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)并植入支架的趋势,并调查PCI后当日出院与非当日出院的趋势。次要目的是比较冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)与PCI手术的比率,第三个目的是比较研究期间显著的PCI趋势变化与PCI指南。

背景

植入支架的PCI是冠状动脉疾病最常见的介入治疗形式,自2000年以来其使用一直在增加。然而,澳大利亚缺乏关于全国趋势的描述性研究。

方法

从澳大利亚卫生与福利研究所的数据中提取了21年(2000/01至2020/21年)所有的PCI和CABG手术。使用截至2001年6月的澳大利亚标准人口计算年龄标准化率。还计算了PCI与CABG手术的比率。PCI的趋势按年龄、性别以及当日或过夜出院情况进行分层。进行线性回归分析以比较不同年龄组的年龄标准化率。进行分段回归分析以确定研究期间PCI年龄标准化率的变化。还评估了趋势中的变化点是否与指南更新相匹配。

结果

2000/01至2020/21年,30岁及以上人群中有751728例PCI手术。研究期间的年龄标准化率显示,60 - 74岁人群的手术率(102.7)高于30 - 59岁人群(81.3)和75岁及以上人群(61.8)(P < 0.001)。总体趋势有两个具有统计学意义的变化点;2005/06年和2013/14年,与PCI指南的变化相匹配。尽管当日出院情况的手术数量较少,但自2014/15年以来呈上升趋势。所有支架植入手术中超过三分之二是植入单个支架。PCI与CABG手术的比率从2000/01年的0.6增加到2020/21年的1.8。

结论

PCI的年龄标准化率呈不同趋势,在2005/06年达到峰值。在研究后期趋势似乎趋于稳定,但当日出院情况的比率在2014/15年后呈上升趋势。趋势中的变化点与更新的PCI指南建议一致。在整个研究期间,植入支架的PCI与CABG手术的比率大幅增加。

相似文献

1
Temporal trends in percutaneous coronary intervention in Australia: A retrospective analysis from 2000-2021.澳大利亚经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的时间趋势:2000年至2021年的回顾性分析
Hellenic J Cardiol. 2024 Nov-Dec;80:21-30. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2023.10.002. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
2
Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.冠状动脉血运重建术后卒率比较:外科手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.071.
3
10-Year Outcomes of Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.左主干冠状动脉疾病中支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术的 10 年结果比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Dec 11;72(23 Pt A):2813-2822. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.012. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
4
National trends in utilization and outcomes of coronary revascularization procedures among people with and without type 2 diabetes in Spain (2001-2011).西班牙2型糖尿病患者和非2型糖尿病患者冠状动脉血运重建手术的使用情况及治疗结果的全国趋势(2001 - 2011年)
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014 Jan 3;13:3. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-13-3.
5
CABG Versus PCI: Greater Benefit in Long-Term Outcomes With Multiple Arterial Bypass Grafting.冠状动脉搭桥术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:多支动脉搭桥术在长期预后方面具有更大益处。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Sep 29;66(13):1417-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.07.060.
6
Revascularization Trends in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Presenting With Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get with the Guidelines (NCDR ACTION Registry-GWTG).伴有非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的糖尿病合并多支冠状动脉疾病患者的血运重建趋势:来自国家心血管数据注册库急性冠状动脉治疗和干预结果网络注册库-遵循指南行动(NCDR ACTION注册库-GWTG)的见解
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 May;9(3):197-205. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002084. Epub 2016 May 10.
7
Long-term Outcomes in Patients With Severely Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左心室射血分数严重降低患者的长期预后
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Jun 1;5(6):631-641. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0239.
8
Temporal Trends in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Insights From the Washington Cardiac Care Outcomes Assessment Program.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术的时间趋势:来自华盛顿心脏护理结果评估计划的见解。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jun 2;9(11):e015317. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015317. Epub 2020 May 27.
9
Trends in Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Coronary Revascularization in the United States, 2003-2016.2003-2016 年美国冠状动脉血运重建患者特征和结局的变化趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e1921326. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.21326.
10
Long-term trends of treatment effect of stenting or bypass surgery in patients with ostial or shaft left main coronary artery disease.开口部或主干左冠状动脉疾病患者支架置入术或旁路手术治疗效果的长期趋势。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 1;94(3):315-322. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28119. Epub 2019 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Mediation effect of hope on the relationship between inner strength and self-management in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.希望在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后患者内心力量与自我管理关系中的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 24;15:1268598. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1268598. eCollection 2024.