Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan.
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 20;13(1):17962. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45180-6.
The aim of this study was to compare in-hospital mortality of three procedures -halo-vest immobilization, anterior spinal fixation (ASF), and posterior spinal fixation (PSF)- in the treatment of elderly patients with isolated C2 odontoid fracture. We extracted data for elderly patients who were admitted with C2 odontoid fracture and treated with at least one of the three procedures (halo-vest immobilization, ASF, or PSF) during hospitalization. We conducted a generalized propensity score-based matching weight analysis to compare in-hospital mortality among the three procedures. We further investigated independent risk factors for in-hospital death. The study involved 891 patients (halo-vest, n = 463; ASF, n = 74; and PSF, n = 354) with a mean age of 78 years. In-hospital death occurred in 45 (5.1%) patients. Treatment type was not significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. Male sex (odds ratio 2.98; 95% confidence interval 1.32-6.73; p = 0.009) and a Charlson comorbidity index of ≥ 3 (odds ratio 9.18; 95% confidence interval 3.25-25.92; p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality. In conclusion, treatment type was not significantly associated with in-hospital mortality in elderly patients with isolated C2 odontoid fracture. Halo-vest immobilization can help to avoid adverse events in patients with C2 odontoid fracture who are considered less suitable for surgical treatment.
本研究旨在比较三种治疗方法(头环背心固定、前路脊柱固定术(ASF)和后路脊柱固定术(PSF))治疗老年单纯 C2 齿状突骨折的院内死亡率。我们提取了因 C2 齿状突骨折而住院并至少接受了三种治疗方法之一(头环背心固定、ASF 或 PSF)治疗的老年患者的数据。我们进行了广义倾向评分匹配加权分析,以比较三种治疗方法的院内死亡率。我们进一步探讨了院内死亡的独立危险因素。该研究纳入了 891 名患者(头环背心固定组,n=463;ASF 组,n=74;PSF 组,n=354),平均年龄为 78 岁。院内死亡发生在 45 例(5.1%)患者中。治疗类型与院内死亡率无显著相关性。男性(优势比 2.98;95%置信区间 1.32-6.73;p=0.009)和 Charlson 合并症指数≥3(优势比 9.18;95%置信区间 3.25-25.92;p<0.001)是院内死亡的独立危险因素。结论:在老年单纯 C2 齿状突骨折患者中,治疗类型与院内死亡率无显著相关性。头环背心固定术有助于避免被认为不适合手术治疗的 C2 齿状突骨折患者发生不良事件。