Yumoto Tetsuya, Naito Hiromichi, Yorifuji Takashi, Aokage Toshiyuki, Fujisaki Noritomo, Nakao Atsunori
Department of Emergency, Critical Care, and Disaster Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1, Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Department of Epidemiology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Nov 6;19(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0282-x.
The Japan Coma Scale (JCS) score has been widely used to assess patients' consciousness level in Japan. JCS scores are divided into four main categories: alert (0) and one-, two-, and three-digit codes based on an eye response test, each of which has three subcategories. The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of the JCS score on hospital arrival in predicting outcomes among adult trauma patients.
Using the Japan Trauma Data Bank, we conducted a nationwide registry-based retrospective cohort study. Patients 16 years old or older directly transported from the trauma scene between January 2004 and December 2017 were included. Our primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. We examined outcome prediction accuracy based on area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and multiple logistic regression analysis with multiple imputation.
A total of 222,540 subjects were included; their in-hospital mortality rate was 7.1% (n = 15,860). The 10-point scale JCS and the total sum of Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores demonstrated similar performance, in which the AUROC (95% CIs) showed 0.874 (0.871-0.878) and 0.878 (0.874-0.881), respectively. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the higher the JCS score, the higher the predictability of in-hospital death. When we focused on the simple four-point scale JCS score, the adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) were 2.31 (2.12-2.45), 4.81 (4.42-5.24), and 27.88 (25.74-30.20) in the groups with one-digit, two-digit, and three-digit scores, respectively, with JCS of 0 as a reference category.
JCS score on hospital arrival after trauma would be useful for predicting in-hospital mortality, similar to the GCS score.
日本昏迷量表(JCS)评分在日本已被广泛用于评估患者的意识水平。JCS评分分为四个主要类别:清醒(0)以及基于眼部反应测试的一位数、两位数和三位数编码,每个类别又分为三个子类别。本研究的目的是调查成人创伤患者入院时JCS评分对预测预后的效用。
我们利用日本创伤数据库进行了一项基于全国登记的回顾性队列研究。纳入了2004年1月至2017年12月期间从创伤现场直接转运的16岁及以上患者。我们的主要结局是院内死亡率。我们基于受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)以及采用多重填补的多元逻辑回归分析来检验结局预测准确性。
共纳入222,540名受试者;他们的院内死亡率为7.1%(n = 15,860)。10分制JCS评分和格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)总分表现相似,其中AUROC(95%置信区间)分别为0.874(0.871 - 0.878)和0.878(0.874 - 0.881)。多元逻辑回归分析显示,JCS评分越高,院内死亡的预测性越高。当我们关注简单的四分制JCS评分时,以JCS评分为0作为参照类别,一位数、两位数和三位数评分组的调整优势比(95%置信区间)分别为2.31(2.12 - 2.45)、4.81(4.42 - 5.24)和27.88(25.74 - 30.20)。
创伤后入院时的JCS评分对于预测院内死亡率很有用,与GCS评分相似。