• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

引导促进之旅:对“吃、走、谈”新手和经验丰富的促进者进行定性、纵向评估。

Navigating the facilitation journey: a qualitative, longitudinal evaluation of 'Eat Walk Engage' novice and experienced facilitators.

机构信息

Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.

Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 20;23(1):1132. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10116-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-023-10116-3
PMID:37864161
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10588033/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) and integrated-PARIHS (i-PARIHS) frameworks position facilitation as an overarching strategy to enable implementation. In the revised i-PARIHS framework, facilitation is operationalised through a multi-level model with novice, experienced and expert facilitators working together in a network structure to build facilitation knowledge and skills along a continuum. To date, there has been limited evaluation of this facilitation model in practice, which is the aim of the study reported here.

METHODS

A descriptive, qualitative longitudinal study was undertaken to track a team of four novice and two experienced facilitators involved in facilitating the implementation of an intervention known as 'Eat Walk Engage' to improve multidisciplinary team delivery of age-friendly care principles in hospital. Over an 18-month period, repeat interviews were conducted to explore the learning, development, and evolving roles of novice facilitators and the roles of the experienced facilitators in providing support and mentoring. Interview data were analysed using a descriptive qualitative approach and findings were interpreted in collaboration with the participating facilitators.

RESULTS

The findings demonstrated experiential learning in both the novice and experienced facilitator groups as they enacted their roles in practice. The novice facilitators progressively transitioned to becoming more experienced facilitators and the experienced facilitators became increasingly expert, in line with the i-PARIHS concept of a facilitation journey from novice to expert. Strategies to support this development included a staggered approach to learning, regular meetings between the experienced and novice facilitators, reflective writing and informal peer support and networking. However, the roles were not without challenge and these challenges changed over time, from a more specific focus on the demands of the facilitator role to concerns about embedding and sustaining improvements in practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Within a network of peers and a mentored relationship with more experienced facilitators, individuals who are new to an implementation facilitator role can transition along a continuum to become experienced facilitators. Building implementation facilitation capability in this way takes time and requires tailored support and mentorship using a mix of structured and flexible approaches incorporating opportunities for reflection to support individual and group learning.

摘要

背景

促进卫生服务实施行动研究(PARIHS)和综合 PARIHS(i-PARIHS)框架将促进作为一种总体策略,以实现实施。在修订后的 i-PARIHS 框架中,促进通过一个多层次模型来运作,新手、经验丰富和专家促进者在网络结构中共同工作,沿着一个连续体建立促进知识和技能。迄今为止,该促进模式在实践中的评估有限,这是本报告所研究的目的。

方法

进行了一项描述性的、纵向的定性研究,以跟踪一组四名新手和两名经验丰富的促进者,他们参与促进一项名为“Eat Walk Engage”的干预措施的实施,以改善医院多学科团队提供适合老年人护理原则的服务。在 18 个月的时间里,重复进行了访谈,以探索新手促进者的学习、发展和不断变化的角色,以及经验丰富的促进者在提供支持和指导方面的角色。使用描述性定性方法对访谈数据进行分析,并与参与的促进者合作解释研究结果。

结果

研究结果表明,在新手和经验丰富的促进者群体中都存在经验学习,因为他们在实践中扮演了自己的角色。新手促进者逐渐过渡到更有经验的促进者,而经验丰富的促进者则越来越成为专家,这符合 i-PARIHS 促进者从新手到专家的促进之旅的概念。支持这种发展的策略包括分阶段学习、经验丰富的促进者和新手促进者之间的定期会议、反思性写作以及非正式的同行支持和网络。然而,这些角色并非没有挑战,而且这些挑战随着时间的推移而变化,从更具体地关注促进者角色的需求到关注在实践中嵌入和维持改进。

结论

在同行网络和与经验丰富的促进者的指导关系中,新的实施促进者角色可以沿着一个连续体过渡到成为有经验的促进者。以这种方式建立实施促进能力需要时间,并需要使用结构化和灵活的方法相结合的定制支持和指导,包括提供反思的机会,以支持个人和小组学习。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc28/10588033/97ce02bd0472/12913_2023_10116_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc28/10588033/97ce02bd0472/12913_2023_10116_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc28/10588033/97ce02bd0472/12913_2023_10116_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Navigating the facilitation journey: a qualitative, longitudinal evaluation of 'Eat Walk Engage' novice and experienced facilitators.引导促进之旅:对“吃、走、谈”新手和经验丰富的促进者进行定性、纵向评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 20;23(1):1132. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10116-3.
2
From novice to expert: methods for transferring implementation facilitation skills to improve healthcare delivery.从新手到专家:传授实施促进技能以改善医疗服务的方法。
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Apr 8;2(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00138-5.
3
Using an implementation science approach to build leader facilitation capability in healthcare: a novel approach for enhancing action learning set facilitation.采用实施科学方法在医疗保健中构建领导力促进能力:一种增强行动学习小组促进的新方法。
J Health Organ Manag. 2021 Sep 17;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/JHOM-12-2020-0510.
4
Designing and implementing two facilitation interventions within the 'Facilitating Implementation of Research Evidence (FIRE)' study: a qualitative analysis from an external facilitators' perspective.设计并实施“促进研究证据实施(FIRE)”研究中的两项促进干预措施:来自外部促进者视角的定性分析。
Implement Sci. 2018 Nov 16;13(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0812-z.
5
External facilitators' perceptions of internal facilitation skills during implementation of collaborative care for mental health teams: a qualitative analysis informed by the i-PARIHS framework.外部促进者对精神卫生团队实施协作式护理过程中内部促进技能的看法:基于 i-PARIHS 框架的定性分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 4;20(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5011-3.
6
Implementing a ward-based programme to improve care for older inpatients: process evaluation of the cluster randomised CHERISH trial.实施基于病房的项目以改善老年住院患者的护理:CHERISH 试验的群组随机对照过程评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 21;23(1):668. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09659-2.
7
Understanding the uptake of a clinical innovation for osteoarthritis in primary care: a qualitative study of knowledge mobilisation using the i-PARIHS framework.理解初级保健中骨关节炎临床创新的应用:应用 i-PARIHS 框架进行的知识转化定性研究。
Implement Sci. 2020 Oct 28;15(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01055-2.
8
From novice to expert: a qualitative study of implementation facilitation skills.从新手到专家:实施促进技能的定性研究
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Feb 25;1:25. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00006-8. eCollection 2020.
9
Clinicians as novice facilitators: a SIMPLE case study.临床医生作为新手促进者:一个 SIMPLE 案例研究。
J Health Organ Manag. 2019 Mar 18;33(1):78-92. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-03-2018-0071. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
10
Is this to be another project that fizzles out? Using the i-PARIHS framework to evaluate implementation of a mentoring programme.这会是又一个虎头蛇尾的项目吗?运用i-PARIHS框架评估一项指导计划的实施情况。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Jan 4. doi: 10.1111/jan.16041.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementing a ward-based programme to improve care for older inpatients: process evaluation of the cluster randomised CHERISH trial.实施基于病房的项目以改善老年住院患者的护理:CHERISH 试验的群组随机对照过程评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 21;23(1):668. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09659-2.
2
Effect of a Ward-Based Program on Hospital-Associated Complications and Length of Stay for Older Inpatients: The Cluster Randomized CHERISH Trial.基于病房的方案对老年住院患者医院相关性并发症和住院时间的影响:集群随机对照 CHERISH 试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Mar 1;182(3):274-282. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.7556.
3
Reflective writing: a tool to support continuous learning and improved effectiveness in implementation facilitators.
反思性写作:一种支持实施促进者持续学习和提高效能的工具。
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Sep 3;2(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00203-z.
4
From novice to expert: methods for transferring implementation facilitation skills to improve healthcare delivery.从新手到专家:传授实施促进技能以改善医疗服务的方法。
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Apr 8;2(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00138-5.
5
Collaborating with health economists to advance implementation science: a qualitative study.与卫生经济学家合作以推进实施科学:一项定性研究。
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Sep 29;1:82. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00074-w. eCollection 2020.
6
Sex and gender analysis in knowledge translation interventions: challenges and solutions.知识转化干预中的性别分析:挑战与解决方案
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Sep 23;18(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00625-6.
7
Experiences of using the i-PARIHS framework: a co-designed case study of four multi-site implementation projects.使用 i-PARIHS 框架的经验:四个多地点实施项目的共同设计案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 23;20(1):573. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05354-8.
8
Multidisciplinary quality improvement programme for older patients admitted to a vascular surgery ward.血管外科病房老年患者的多学科质量改进计划。
Intern Med J. 2020 Jun;50(6):741-748. doi: 10.1111/imj.14400.
9
Facilitating Implementation of Research Evidence (FIRE): an international cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate two models of facilitation informed by the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework.促进研究证据实施(FIRE):一项国际群组随机对照试验,旨在评估两种基于促进卫生服务研究实施(PARIHS)框架的促进模式。
Implement Sci. 2018 Nov 16;13(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0831-9.
10
A realist process evaluation within the Facilitating Implementation of Research Evidence (FIRE) cluster randomised controlled international trial: an exemplar.在促进实施研究证据(FIRE)集群随机对照国际试验中进行的现实主义过程评估:一个范例。
Implement Sci. 2018 Nov 16;13(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0811-0.