Surendera Dental College and Research Institute, Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan 335001, India.
A.C.P.M Dental College, Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Dhule, Maharashtra 424002, India.
Int Orthod. 2024 Mar;22(1):100819. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100819. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
The primary objective of this study was to investigate the biomechanical effects and stresses on bone, PDL, cementum and displacement along X-,Y- and Z-axis during true intrusion of molars using mini-implants with finite element analysis; the secondary objective of the study was to find out the best method for posterior intrusion in clinical practice.
A 3D finite element method was used to simulate true molar intrusion using sliding mechanics. Two groups were made, with mini-implants placed on buccal side and palatal side with a cap splint for MODEL1, and a single mini-implant placed buccally with transpalatal arch (TPA) for MODEL2. The material characteristics which include the Young's modulus and Poison's ratio were assigned. von Mises stress, principal stress on PDL and alveolar bone, displacements in all the 3 planes were determined.
Bone stress patterns showed compressive stresses on the buccal aspect and tensile stresses on the palatal aspect for both MODELS. Stresses in the PDL and cementum were mainly concentrated in the apex region, with a more uniform distribution of stresses for MODEL 1. Tooth displacement showed true intrusion for both MODELS, i.e. the Z axis, and a more controlled buccal tipping for MODEL 1.
Of the modalities compared, the best controlled tooth movements for posterior intrusion in the treatment of open bite were obtained with mini-implants placed with a cap splint (MODEL 1).
本研究的主要目的是通过有限元分析研究使用微型种植体真正磨牙内倾时对骨、牙周膜、牙骨质和 X、Y、Z 轴方向位移的生物力学影响和应力;本研究的次要目的是找出临床后倾磨牙的最佳方法。
采用滑动力学模拟真正磨牙内倾的三维有限元方法。将微型种植体分别放置在颊侧和腭侧(MODEL1),以及单个微型种植体放置在颊侧并用腭杆(TPA)(MODEL2),制作两组。分配了包括杨氏模量和泊松比在内的材料特性。确定了 Von Mises 应力、牙周膜和牙槽骨上的主应力、所有三个平面上的位移。
两种模型的骨应力模式均显示颊侧为压应力,腭侧为张应力。PDL 和牙骨质的应力主要集中在根尖区域,模型 1 的应力分布更均匀。两种模型的牙齿位移均显示为真正的内倾,即 Z 轴,模型 1 的颊倾更可控。
在所比较的方法中,使用带帽夹板(MODEL1)放置微型种植体可获得后倾磨牙治疗开颌的最佳控制牙齿移动。