Lejeune H, Jasselette P, Nagy J, Peree F
Physiol Behav. 1986;38(3):337-43. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(86)90104-6.
Weanling (21 days), adult (100 days) and senescent (26 months) albino rats were submitted for 8 days to a fixed interval 60 second schedule, at a pace of 5 half-hour sessions a day. Temporal regulation indices (Curvature Index of Fry, Kelleher and Cook), overall response rates and running rates depend upon the age of the subjects and rank orderly (weanling greater than adult greater than senile). No significant difference was found for post-reinforcement pause durations. Two weeks after the end of the FI 60 second sessions, the senile subjects were submitted to a FI 120 second schedule for 10 days. The inverse relationship between age and temporal regulation accuracy evidenced in FI 60 seconds is discussed in relationship with classical FI data, factors involved in developmental studies and models for time regulated behavior.
将断乳期(21天)、成年期(100天)和衰老期(26个月)的白化大鼠按照每天5个半小时的时段,以固定间隔60秒的时间表进行为期8天的实验。时间调节指标(Fry、Kelleher和Cook的曲率指数)、总体反应率和奔跑速率取决于实验对象的年龄,且呈有序排列(断乳期大于成年期大于衰老期)。强化后停顿时间未发现显著差异。在60秒固定间隔实验结束两周后,对衰老期实验对象进行为期10天的120秒固定间隔实验。结合经典的固定间隔实验数据、发育研究中涉及的因素以及时间调节行为模型,讨论了在60秒固定间隔实验中所证明的年龄与时间调节准确性之间的反比关系。